War on Terror

Legislating Tyranny By Paul Craig Roberts and Lawrence M. Stratton

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article20056.htm

("On May 9, 2007, President Bush signed the National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive. If in the president’s opinion a “catastrophic emergency” occurs, the directive places all governmental power in the hands of the president, effectively abolishing the checks and balances in the Constitution." . . . This is what worries me, many of us. Will something in September or October, 2008 happen? So much circumstantial evidence seems to say so . . . , and I hope obviously, I'm wrong. --Betsy)

Legislating Tyranny

By Paul Craig Roberts and Lawrence M. Stratton

07/06/08 "Lew Rockwell" -- -The George W. Bush administration responded to the 9/11 attack on the World Trade Center and Pentagon with an assault on U.S. civil liberty that Bush justified in the name of the “war on terror.” The government assured us that the draconian measures apply only to “terrorists.” The word terrorist, however, was not defined. The government claimed the discretionary power to decide who is a terrorist without having to present evidence or charges in a court of law.

Bush's Endless Hypocrisy on Terror, By Robert Parry

http://www.consortiumnews.com/2008/052008.html

Bush's Endless Hypocrisy on Terror

By Robert Parry
May 21, 2008

Is a government guilty of terrorism if it harbors known terrorists? What should one say about a country that permits open fund-raising on behalf of a terrorist implicated in the mass killing of civilians?

What about a government that secretly arms a guerrilla army that wantonly kills and abuses civilians while seeking to overthrow an elected government?

If your answer to those questions is to recite George W. Bush’s dictum that a government that harbors or helps terrorists should be punished just like the terrorists, then you must turn your wrath on the U.S. government and the Bush family -- guilty on all the above points.

But the U.S. political/media system continues to view the world through a cracked lens that focuses outrage on “enemy” regimes while refracting away a comparable fury from similar actions by U.S. officials.

Neocons ADMIT that “War On Terror” is a Hoax

http://georgewashington2.blogspot.com/2008/05/neocons-admit-that-war-on-terror-was.html

Key war on terror architect Douglas Feith has now confirmed Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz and Wesley Clark in admitting that the so-called War on Terror is a hoax.

In fact, starting right after 9/11 -- at the latest -- the goal has always been to create "regime change" and instability in Iraq, Iran, Syria, Libya, Sudan, Somalia and Lebanon so as to protect Israel. And the goal was never really to destroy Al Qaeda.

As stated in an article in Asia Times:

Operation Torch: Police State NYC

Militarized police armed with M4 carbine rifles and MP5 submachine guns
are coming to the New York subways to save us from the terrorists.

Al-Qaeda in Yemen, Italy and Canada; Bernard Lewis, Rich B, and Osama bin Laden - Additions as of April 13, 2008

This week's new entries cover a number of varied topics. An address book seized in 1997 provided an opportunity to uncover al-Qaeda cells in Canada, where no action was taken against a founder of al-Qaeda despite evidence against him, although the Pakistani army did at least shoot him dead in 2003. However, his son became an informer for the CIA and uncovered a Bosnian network sending fighters to Iraq

The Precautionary Principle

A clip from Adam Curtis' BBC documentary, "The Power of Nightmares".

In building Iraq, I don't like the prices that we're paying...

In building Iraq, I don't like the prices that we're paying..
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
America has been in Iraq for five years - longer than it spent in either World War #1 or #2.

Daily military operations (not counting, for example, future care of wounded) have already cost more than 12 years in Vietnam, and twice as much as the Korean war.

America is spending $16bn a month on running costs alone (ie on top of the regular expenses of the Department of Defence) in Iraq and Afghanistan; that is the entire annual budget of the UN.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In building Iraq, I don't like the prices that we're paying..
To Ask These Questions, Just Fill In The (Blanks)...

Sharon Stone: Truther?

I found this item where Stone says - careful, I'm translating from Spanish, which is in turn a translation from the Arabic here
"I've never believed the official story about the terrorist attacks on the Twin Towers in New York, and I've never believed the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq were a direct consequence of them."
The AP does cite the interview, but only her comments against the wars:

New Exhibit: War On Terror Didn't Start On 9/11

I wonder if this exhibit includes examples of such false flag/synthetic terror attacks as The Gulf of Tonkin Incident, the sinking of the USS Maine, or the planned (but not executed) Operation Northwoods?

Video Source: http://wcco.com/video/?id=38461@wcco.dayport.com

New Exhibit: War On Terror Didn't Start On 9/11

The War on Terror has been a focus for America since 9/11, but it's actually nothing new in America. A new exhibit at the Minnesota History Center explores the history of terrorism in our country, John Reger Reports.

Source: http://www.mnhs.org/exhibits/enemy/

The Enemy Within: Terror in America, 1776 to Today

America's war on terror didn't start with the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001. This exhibit at the Minnesota History Center explores the history of terrorism in America that dates back to the birth of the nation.

More Propoganda :Bhutto Murder Closes Anti-Terror War Cycle Bush Launched after 9/11

Interesting propoganda from Israelite Intelligence Source: Debka.com
Looks like the War Agenda is Still On. Thanks to the Amazing and Always Useful Al-Qaeda.
"...Al Qaeda left its fingerprints – but typically no trace of the perpetrators........". 911 Bloggers know better. Your valued comments and analysis please.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://debka.com/article.php?aid=1325

DEBKAfile Analysis: Bush presidency started with 9/11, winds down with al Qaeda’s most disastrous assault on the Western war on terror – the 27/12 murder of Benazir Bhutto

December 29, 2007, 10:45 PM (GMT+02:00)

The assassination of Benazir Bhutto, Washington’s chosen linchpin-to-be in Islamabad, was an unmitigated disaster for America’s war on al Qaeda and its jihadist allies in the key Pakistan-Afghan arena. The 27/12 murder closed a cycle sent spinning by al Qaeda’s 9/11 assault on America in the early days of President George W. Bush’s first term. It has left him clutching at thin air.

The Ghoul of 911 Endorsed by Pat Robertson! Someone refer him to therealrudy.org

Pat Robertson Endorses Rudy: Deems Him 'More Than Acceptable to People of Faith'

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2007/11/robertson_to_endorse_giuliani.html

Pat Robertson, one of the most influential figures in the social conservative movement, announced his support for Rudy Giuliani's presidential bid this morning at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C. [Watch the video below]

What about the 911 P.A.T.R.I.O.T. ACT?!!! White House Tells Musharraf: Never ‘Restrict Constitutional Freedoms’ To Fight Terror

White House Tells Musharraf: Never ‘Restrict Constitutional Freedoms’ To Fight Terrorism

Think Progress
Tuesday November 6, 2007

http://thinkprogress.org/2007/11/05/musharraf-freedom/

During today’s White House press briefing, spokeswoman Dana Perino condemned Gen. Pervez Musharraf’s declaration of “emergency rule” in Pakistan. She said that the administration is “deeply disappointed” by the measure, which suspends the country’s constitution, and believes it is never “reasonable” to “restrict constitutional freedoms in the name of fighting terrorism”:

Q: Is it ever reasonable to restrict constitutional freedoms in the name of fighting terrorism?

MS. PERINO: In our opinion, no.

Watch it:

What do you stand for?

Source: http://www.lionsforlambsmovie.com/site.html

The first thing one sees when arriving at the "Lions for Lambs" movie website is the following question posted at the center of the screen:

What do you stand for?

I typed in "9/11 truth" and pressed ENTER.

And this is what I got:

9/11 Truth

THANK YOU for your submission!
Check back to see if it has been approved.
Approved responses may be posted on the site.

Maybe if enough of us post the same thing (or something similar) 9/11 truth will get that much more national exposure!

9/11 Trek

9/11 Trek

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ysa8sVGllQI

The Enterprise crew discusses 9/11, War, Fascism in America and the
media. Concept, story board by and editing by Pete Swann. Voices by Pete Swann and Michael Thorne.

RSS