"If and when the 28 redacted pages of the Joint Congressional Inquiry are released, and people in our Government try to use those pages as an excuse to go to war with Saudi Arabia (which I don't think they can do since Saudi Arabia owns a large portion of this country), we will need to make sure the whole history of the relationship between Saudi Arabia and those two hijackers in San Diego is known, that the whole history of the CIA seemingly protecting those two hijackers in San Diego is known, that one of the first things Bush did when he came into office was to tell the alphabet agencies to "back off" the Saudis and the Bin Ladens, that we have protected Saudi Arabia's support for terrorism since long before 9/11, that the Bush Family, George Tenet and Prince Bandar were really good friends (money connected to those two hijackers in San Diego came from the Bandar family), that George W. Bush and Bandar were talking about the need for "decisive action" in Iraq in the months before 9/11, that Bandar said Saudi intelligence was following most of the hijackers "with precision," that Philip Zelikow and Prince Bandar both belong to the Aspen Strategy Group, that the Consulate in Jeddah where some of the hijackers got their Visas was the same consulate used in the 80's to bring "terrorists" to the U.S. to train for the Afghanistan/Russia War, that the VIsa Express Program, a program used by some of the hijackers to get visas, applied only to Saudi Arabia and was started months before 9/11. Stuff like that…" ~ Jon Gold
Are a disgrace. They know damn well what they've actively participated in, and they surely know that the official story narrative 9/11 Commission Report is a lie from beginning to end.
If the 28 redacted pages are released to the public, what's to guarantee that the original text remains verbatim? If it has been changed, censored/re-redacted, or altered in any way, who is going to know any better, outside of people who cannot say anything on account of their 'national security' (!!!) oath? The parties responsible for maintaining secrecy on this (and so much related) material have a track record of lying, fabricating, dissembling and every imaginable kind of deception known to humankind, especially when the treasonous butts of senior officials are on the line.
Election time is coming up and this our golden opportunity to get some microphone coverage. C-span coverage is great.
Rand Paul (R) is running for President as is Jeb Bush (R)
Jeb Bush is ex-Governor of Florida. Bob Graham is ex-Governor of Florida.
Rand Pual wants 28 pages released. Bob Graham wants 28 pages released. Kean/Hamilton want 28 pages released
Bob Graham was on Joint Congressional Inquiry Report. Kean / Hamilton were on 9/11 commission. All concur that 28 pages would help Americans.
We need to get the question to Jeb Bush to answer the question of:
----- Does he agree with fellow Republican presidential contender Rand Paul, fellow ex-Florida governor Bob Graham, both 9/11 report heads Kean/Hamilton, that the 1 full chapter of 28 adjacent redacted pages of who funded the 9/11 attacks be made public to the American people? Does he support the growing movement calling for the release of these 28 pages nearly 14 years after the attacks of 9/11?
----- Does he think knowing who funded the 9/11 attacks is of any practical significance in protecting the US public against repeat attacks?
Weather its on the Presidential Candidate debate stage, radio show, tv program, or public space. We need to have is response . With all this talk about Bandar, we will have a BUSH to answer legitimate questions when running for such high office.
Our foot into the QUESTION of the 28 pages to BUSH is FELLOW REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTIAL CONTENDER Rand Paul and FELLOW EX-FLORIDA GOVERNOR Bob Graham who support . That helps set up the question without coming across as unprofessional.
Jon Gold on a roll...
"If and when the 28 redacted pages of the Joint Congressional Inquiry are released, and people in our Government try to use those pages as an excuse to go to war with Saudi Arabia (which I don't think they can do since Saudi Arabia owns a large portion of this country), we will need to make sure the whole history of the relationship between Saudi Arabia and those two hijackers in San Diego is known, that the whole history of the CIA seemingly protecting those two hijackers in San Diego is known, that one of the first things Bush did when he came into office was to tell the alphabet agencies to "back off" the Saudis and the Bin Ladens, that we have protected Saudi Arabia's support for terrorism since long before 9/11, that the Bush Family, George Tenet and Prince Bandar were really good friends (money connected to those two hijackers in San Diego came from the Bandar family), that George W. Bush and Bandar were talking about the need for "decisive action" in Iraq in the months before 9/11, that Bandar said Saudi intelligence was following most of the hijackers "with precision," that Philip Zelikow and Prince Bandar both belong to the Aspen Strategy Group, that the Consulate in Jeddah where some of the hijackers got their Visas was the same consulate used in the 80's to bring "terrorists" to the U.S. to train for the Afghanistan/Russia War, that the VIsa Express Program, a program used by some of the hijackers to get visas, applied only to Saudi Arabia and was started months before 9/11. Stuff like that…" ~ Jon Gold
Uh-oh
I've seen the movie before somewhere. When Kean and Hamilton are calling for release of the 28 pages, "Take evasive action...It's a trap!"
Kean and Hamilton
Are a disgrace. They know damn well what they've actively participated in, and they surely know that the official story narrative 9/11 Commission Report is a lie from beginning to end.
If released, will it be complete and verbatim? (!)
If the 28 redacted pages are released to the public, what's to guarantee that the original text remains verbatim? If it has been changed, censored/re-redacted, or altered in any way, who is going to know any better, outside of people who cannot say anything on account of their 'national security' (!!!) oath? The parties responsible for maintaining secrecy on this (and so much related) material have a track record of lying, fabricating, dissembling and every imaginable kind of deception known to humankind, especially when the treasonous butts of senior officials are on the line.
Vice coverage...
Campaign Mounts to Declassify 9/11 Report’s References to Alleged Saudi Involvement
https://news.vice.com/article/campaign-mounts-to-declassify-911-reports-references-to-alleged-saudi-involvement?utm_source...
We need to know: Did Saudis help fund 9/11 attacks?
http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2015/07/06/declassification-28-pages-911-saudis-column/28926283/
Need to have Jeb Bush answer his position on 28 pages.
Election time is coming up and this our golden opportunity to get some microphone coverage. C-span coverage is great.
Rand Paul (R) is running for President as is Jeb Bush (R)
Jeb Bush is ex-Governor of Florida. Bob Graham is ex-Governor of Florida.
Rand Pual wants 28 pages released. Bob Graham wants 28 pages released. Kean/Hamilton want 28 pages released
Bob Graham was on Joint Congressional Inquiry Report. Kean / Hamilton were on 9/11 commission. All concur that 28 pages would help Americans.
We need to get the question to Jeb Bush to answer the question of:
----- Does he agree with fellow Republican presidential contender Rand Paul, fellow ex-Florida governor Bob Graham, both 9/11 report heads Kean/Hamilton, that the 1 full chapter of 28 adjacent redacted pages of who funded the 9/11 attacks be made public to the American people? Does he support the growing movement calling for the release of these 28 pages nearly 14 years after the attacks of 9/11?
----- Does he think knowing who funded the 9/11 attacks is of any practical significance in protecting the US public against repeat attacks?
Weather its on the Presidential Candidate debate stage, radio show, tv program, or public space. We need to have is response . With all this talk about Bandar, we will have a BUSH to answer legitimate questions when running for such high office.
Our foot into the QUESTION of the 28 pages to BUSH is FELLOW REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTIAL CONTENDER Rand Paul and FELLOW EX-FLORIDA GOVERNOR Bob Graham who support . That helps set up the question without coming across as unprofessional.