for all the time and effort you put into these experiments (and the videos too). They're excellent demonstrations of how we've been lied to about what destroyed the towers and I hope as many people as possible see them. I will share them of course.

Thanks for the cool experiments!

It seems possible to me to give a much stronger argument, that the official explanations for the collapse of the towers are vastly insufficient.
But not based on "force", but on energy.

Here it should be possible to make rather simple calculations, which, due to their abstract nature, actually are fully convincing.

Namely one has to make rough estimations how much energy was available, according to the official explanations(!), and what energy would be needed to obtain the observed effects.

For the available energy A, one should make gross simplifying assumptions which definitely overestimate A.
For the needed energy N, one should make gross simplifying assumptions which definitely underestimate N.

The guess is that N >> A (N much bigger A) --- and that's it!

For estimating A: Put all the weight of the building into one point on top of the building, and calculate the potential energy.
Make an overestimation about the available fuel and other burning material, and assume it burned optimally, calculate the energy set free.
Plus the kinetic energy by the airplane.
Add it up, obtain A.

For N, one needs on (under-)estimation of the energy needed to pulverise all the concrete and spread it over the area, and to separate the structural elements.

Now I am not an engineer, and can't do the calculations (especially concerning N). But I guess for the right people it shouldn't be too hard to do.
One then needed to see the numbers, and how grossly one can do the estimations -- if we are lucky, then a very gross estimation is enough.
And in this case, this would actually be most convincing, due to the (truly) abstract nature of these considerations (different from the model building, where one can always say "not realistic") -- energy conservation is a fundamental physical law, and if these calculations are successful, they demonstrate beyond doubt that there must be additional energy sources.

The 9/11 Truth Movement should offer a million dollar prize to anyone who can demonstrate a crush-down crush-up, or demolition by fire in the case of World Trade Tower 7. I wonder how many takers we would get?