Flyby News - www.FlybyNews.com
Editor - Jonathan Mark - January 30, 2010
The Biggest Lie * The Hague * Howard Zinn

"The first truth is that the liberty of a democracy
is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of
private power to a point where it becomes
stronger than their democratic State itself.
That, in its essence, is fascism —
ownership of government by an individual,
by a group or by any other
controlling private power."

- Franklin D. Roosevelt

Editor’s Notes:

If you have not subscribed (free) to Flyby News (FN), then this is the first issue of 2010. Please take your time reading and absorbing, since there is quite a bit of information. However, I want to encourage you to take action soon, regarding item 2, which contains a formal response to Francis Boyle, Professor of International Law, from The Hague on his filing against Bush et al for the war-crime "Extraordinary Rendition." Please consider endorsing and supporting this campaign ASAP.

Well I was visited by a young man that I hadn't seen for sometime. He stopped by my place of employment in his military issued apparel and looked in great shape. He was dressed in his Army issue sweater and impeccable pants. As he walked in, I jumped up and shook his hand. The goober looking kid I once knew had now transformed into a man.

His first warning was to not get upset if the FBI contacted me. I looked at him curiously and he said, "Oh its not like that. I used you as a reference so the FBI maybe contacting you."

"Oh ok. I've done that before with a best friend in the Navy when he was issued an advanced security clearance so I know what to expect.", I replied. He said, "Ok, cool, so you won't like freak out." "Naww.", I said.
He walked over to the computer to check out what I was looking at. He pointed to what I was looking at which was a yellow line which was the official 9/11 flight path into the Pentagon. I told him as such and he snickered like what the hell does the 9/11 Commission know? I agreed.

This issue is of major importance and I hope that people will take the time to read this essay and the one by Michael Salla, Was a Covert Attempt to Bomb Iran with Nuclear Weapons foiled by a Military Leak?. It is important to understand that this flight did NOT occur due to a mistake and that it was illegal. The orders for it had to have come from the top. This incident very much resembles a display of rogue power along the lines of 9/11. ...Alvin
(Thanks to Mssr. Jouet, for finding this one.)
_________________

Saturday, September 8, 2007
Dave Lindorff

There’s something definitely screwy about the August 30 incident in which a B-52 bomber flew from Minot AFB in North Dakota to Barksdale AFB in Louisiana carrying five fully armed Advanced Cruise Missiles, each equipped with nuclear bombs capable of exploding at anything from 5 kilotons to 150 kilotons.

Only one time before in history has the entire military air force been put on stand-down, and that was on 9.11.01. Now again, our country will be unprotected on September 14 as the military goes into stand-down mode to check procedures. Our country will be like a sitting duck, with no air defense. Read the story below.

http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/09/05/loose.nukes/index.html

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Six nuclear warheads on cruise missiles were mistakenly carried on a flight from North Dakota to Louisiana last week, prompting a major investigation, military officials have confirmed.

The plane took the cruise missiles from Minot Air Force Base to Barksdale Air Force Base for decommissioning Thursday, the Air Force said.

"This is a major gaffe, and it's going to cause some heads to roll down the line," said Don Shepperd, a retired Air Force major general and military analyst for CNN.

Shepperd said the United States had agreed in a Cold War-era treaty not to fly nuclear weapons. "It appears that what happened was this treaty agreement was violated," he said.

Flyby News Notes -
Editor - Jonathan Mark - FlybyNews.com
http://www.flybynews.com/cgi-local/newspro/viewnews.cgi?newsid1188396457,91929,

Sooner or later, everyone sits down to
a banquet of consequences.
- - Robert Louis Stevenson

1) Report: US Has Plans to Attack Iran
- - The Kennebunk Warning
- - Rep. Conyers' Latest on Impeachment
- - Are Bush & Co. Gearing Up to Attack Iran?
- - Market Crash Forecast Suggests New 9/11
- - National Guard Troops from Florida Deploy To Nation's Capital
- - UN reports record production of opium in Afghanistan
2) The Truth About 9/11 Is Rising to the Surface
- - Academy of Sciences Member Calls for New 9/11 Investigation
- - Thunder Bay, Ontario's only daily newspaper covers 9/11 truth
- - Evidence Suggests CIA Purposefully Spiked Investigations
- - 9/11/07 Global Day of Action & Letter from Donna Marsh O'Connor
- - Police provocateurs caught 'rock-handed' at SPP meeting in Canada
- - Robert Fisk--Even I question the 'truth' about 9/11
- - Chief of NIST's Fire Science Division Calls for Independent Review
- - 9/11 First Responders Benefit & Rally

The Kenne'bunk(?)'port Warnings have touched a raw nerve it appears for all involved and not so involved. Clearly, things need to be cleared up. Apologies, if appropriate, should come freely and just an overall sense of making things right. Meanwhile, it is striking to me to have just gone trolling at dailykos and glimpsed comments to the effect, "yeah, Cheney's capable of that and some of the signatories are credible, but show me the evidence and a notarized copy of signatures if you want me to really bug out at my computer screen." I swear to God, I am in the twilight zone, we all are. "Yeah, I can believe that the man second in line to protect the American people is capable of taking out a city or three with mini-nukes, or at least with radiological devices of some sort. But not necessariy right now, or next week. Yeah, possibly to probably before the next elections."

Proponents of the micro-nuke theory of controlled demolition have argued that the molten metal found weeks after 9/11 cannot be explained by thermite, since fire requires oxygen. They say the red-hot metal underground proves that nuclear devices were used on 9/11.

It was pretty easy to find the error in the above argument. Thermite does not require atmospheric oxygen in order to burn, so a thermite fire could continue burning underground.

Thermite is a mixture of iron oxide and aluminum.
THE OXYGEN FOR THE REACTION IS PROVIDED BY THE IRON OXIDE.

Here is the equation:

FE2 O3 + 2AL ---> AL2 O3 + 2 FE
Thermite = Iron Oxide + Aluminium ---> Aluminium Oxide + Iron + Heat
(from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermite)

The same amount of oxygen goes into and comes out of the reaction; it just changes over from iron oxide to aluminium oxide.

This makes sense - if the reaction depended on oxygen from the air, it wouldn't burn so hot.
Air is only about 20% oxygen and is also very diluted being a gas, compared to a solid like iron oxide - that's why some rockets use solid fuel.

Several days ago I received an e-mail from the local 9/11 activist group here in San Diego, SD911Truth.org. As I was reading it getting updates on upcoming events I noticed a blurb of an upcoming speaker, Dr. Bill Deagle M.D. Since I am always interested in hearing new speakers, I quickly downloaded the file that came with the e-mail to listen to one of his lectures. To my surprise, Dr. Deagle began giving out information that was very suspect so I decided to do a little digging to see what I could find out about him. A quick Google search led me to this website: http://www.americaslastdays.com/deagle.htm

Via Scott Horton at www.TheStressBlog.com ...

Ellsberg: Hastert got suitcases of Al Qaeda heroin cash, should be in jail

This is from Jim Marrs website dated 10/11/2006

Check out the article on the website below and reflect on how well this concept covers all the known features of the destruction of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers on 9/11. Dr. Ed Ward, a medical doctor and former soldier, offers perhaps the most reasoned and reasonable analysis of what may have caused the WTC destruction. His article is one you do not want to miss.

Jim Marrs

September 25, 2006

Declassified August 1958: "Mere fact that the U. S. has developed atomic munitions suitable for use in demolition work." Declassified January 1967, "The fact that we are interested in and are continuing studies on a weapon for minimizing the emerging flux of neutrons and internal induced activity." Declassified March 1976, "The fact of weapon laboratory interest in Minimum Residual Radiation (MRR) devices. The fact of successful development of MRR devices."