by Ron Brookman, S.E.

Thank you to Mickey Huff and KPFA radio for hosting the Twin Towers debate on the tenth anniversary of September 11. Richard Gage and Niels Harrit described hard evidence for the controlled-demolition hypothesis; Dave Thomas and Richard Muller promoted the fire-induced collapse hypothesis. Listen to the entire debate at http://www.kpfa.org/archive/id/73245.

Richard Gage, AIA is a San Francisco Bay Area architect and founder of AE911Truth—a nonprofit organization with over 1,600 professional architects and engineers plus over 13,000 others who are calling for a science-based investigation of the destruction of the three high-rise buildings.¹

Dr. Niels Harrit, associate professor emeritus of chemistry from the University of Copenhagen, has published over 60 peer-reviewed papers in scientific journals including ''Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe."²

This version in 6 parts has well synchronized audio - video.

The film features Richard Gage AIA, Dr. Stephen E. Jones, David Chandler and members of Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth, with original music courtesy of Eva James.

The presentation proves the world trade center buildings were demolished with explosives. It shows why a new scientific investigation and judicial inquiry is needed.

This edited compilation is presented under terms of "Fair Use". The intention of this creation is for non-profit, educational and personal use. Portions of copyrighted material may be included under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976. Allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching and research. Any other use may require that permission be obtained from the original copyright owner.

The Science of 9/11
This original compilation has a running time of 55 minutes.

If you would like a free DVD quality down link that does not have a problem with the video-audio synchronization, send an email to
911TrueStory@Gmail.com

Current download links include:

You Tube link
http://youtu.be/d8Z_CchNF8A

MP4 file
http://www.archive.org/download/Science_Of_9-11/Science_Of_9-11.mp4

QuickTime .mov file
http://www.archive.org/download/Science_Of_9-11/Science_Of_9-11.mov

This film features Richard Gage AIA, Dr. Stephen E. Jones, David Chandler and members of Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth, with original music courtesy of Eva James.

The presentation shows why a new scientific investigation and judicial inquiry is needed.

See below for the download link to save the DVD ISO file (over 3.1 GB).

https://www.adrive.com/public/ddb8f6f096e2904f6f52bb4b2cb3fb8b75f7259e837cc44d473bcbeaaeee601b.html

After it is saved on your computer or flash drive, you can burn it to a DVD using a program such as ImgBurn.
You can get this at http://ImgBurn.com

You can also download a MP4 file, using You Tube Downloader software, using this link:
http://youtu.be/zDlm3DDQ7BE

Relics, Artifacts and Memories: A Year Spent With World Trade Center Steel
Truthout, Amanda Lin Costa, September 11, 2011

I didn’t set off to become an expert in World Trade Center (WTC) steel but recently it occurred to me I was becoming one. The thought first dawned on me about a month ago, after I spent the day filming at The National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) as part of a documentary I have been working on about WTC steel.

I spent hours with Stephen W. Banovic, a materials research scientist in the Metallurgy Division of the Materials Science and Engineering Laboratory at NIST, and Michael E. Newman, senior communications officer at NIST. Both men had spent more than six years of their lives living and breathing the WTC steel during the intensive investigation into the collapse of the Twin Towers.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PwqLu8ZXIX0

Background: http://911blogger.com/news/2010-11-10/911-experiments-great-thermate-debate

Editorial Introduction by Dick Zehnle

NIST likes to point out how many scientists and engineers worked on its WTC investigation, and how much time was spent. But the number of participants and the time and money spent does not guarantee a thorough investigation.

NIST’s investigation is not in line with the most basic requirements of the scientific method. This is demonstrated by a closer look at NIST’s examination of the steel, which was based on the premise that nothing other than airplane impact damage and the subsequent fires brought down the Twin Towers. The most relevant question – why did the strong steel frames below the impact area give way? – is ignored. NIST cannot justify its failure to adequately examine the steel with its published results; examining the evidence adequately is a step that needs to be done at the beginning of an investigation.

Here's a new video in which The NIST World Trade Center report for the Twin Towers is examined and shown to be false and unscientific.

Uploaded by DK1Ryan on Aug 14, 2011

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H8wOXv2gAKg

Bob Coen, who made the film "Anthrax War," has also launched a new site that is in preparation for his new film.
http://www.secretsofthedust.com/launch.html

http://wearechangenewjersey.com/?p=1353

Glenn Zarmanov
4/4/11
WeAreChangeNewJersey.COM

The crime of the century has gone overlooked for 10 years. It should be an insult to one’s intelligence that a national emergency occurred on 9/11, the date the same as the national number for emergency, 911. The branding of the September 11, 2001 attacks as “Nine-Eleven” alone should be suspicious enough, nevermind the fact that they were used for political gain by both Republican and Democrat administrations. 9/11 has been the catalyst for kicking the American Police State into high gear as well as the justification for offensive foreign policies, but perhaps even those aren’t enough reasons to convince some people that the subject needs further examination.

How can we honestly discuss science if we do not pay careful attention to logic?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_fallacies

Paradoxically, the logical fallacies get little attention, but they are among the most useful of tools for thinking clearly about 9/11.

For instance, the basic "appeal to unqualified authority" helps short-circuit NIST's injection of possibly false information into the debate.

A couple of videos that point out fallacies in NIST's reasoning:

Sunder on What Controlled Demolition Looks Like
http://bit.ly/Sunder_on_What_Controlled_Demolition_Looks_Like

We Have the Results and Only We Have the Results
http://bit.ly/We_Have_the_Results_and_Only_We_Have_the_Results

http://www.wearechangenewjersey.com/?p=1261

Glenn Zarmanov
3/3/11
WeAreChangeNewJersey.COM

HELP THIS STORY BREAK INTO THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA!

Thanks to James Gourley at the International Center for 9/11 Studies, the only individual to successfully sue NIST over a FOIA request for the entirety of the footage that’s been covered up for the past 10 years, we now have overwhelming evidence that disproves the official story of nine-eleven. Of the 5 terrabytes of data released, maybe 35% has been analyzed and posted on YouTube for the world to see. Even Gourley’s organization itself has not had the time to examine and post all of the new evidence and so other 9/11 researchers have taken up the task of downloading the raw data from the “NIST Cumulus Database” and posting the converted videos to YouTube and elsewhere all over the internet. We here at WeAreChangeNewJersey.COM will continue to post this new evidence until it is fully released.

Here are some of the best channels to get started investigating the new evidence:

youtube.com/wearechangenj

http://wearechangenewjersey.com/?p=939

Glenn Zarmanov
2/6/11
WeAreChangeNewJersey.COM

HELP THIS STORY BREAK INTO THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA!

RELATED STORIES:

New Evidence Uncovers 9/11 Truth
http://wearechangenewjersey.com/?p=678

2010 NIST 9/11 Footage Leaks Ignored
http://wearechangenewjersey.com/?p=751

Media Admits To Having 9/11 Foreknowledge
http://wearechangenewjersey.com/?p=770

9 Years Of Hidden Evidence Exposes Massive 9/11 Coverup
http://wearechangenewjersey.com/?p=783

911Gate – Video Releases Disprove Official Story
http://wearechangenewjersey.com/?p=792

WeAreChange New Jersey Releases 5th Cache Of New 9/11 Video Evidence
http://wearechangenewjersey.com/?p=822

911Leaks: Meet James Gourley, The Real Julian Assange
http://wearechangenewjersey.com/?p=853

URL:  http://911speakout.org/?page_id=10

On June 10, 2010, Dr. Fahim Sadek of NIST (fahim.sadek@nist.gov), an investigator who produced the Bush Administration's report on the WTC, gave a lecture at the Engineering College of Aarhus on the entire WTC Investigation. This is apparently the only time that NIST has given a detailed talk on their entire investigation.

It was expected that Sadek would take questions at the end of the lecture. However, nobody was allowed to ask any. Nevertheless, before Sadek left, Dr. Niels Harrit managed to catch him for a brief talk.

Three months before on February 28th, 2010, Dr. Niels Harrit gave a presentation on the collapse of World Trade Center 7 in Aarhus, Denmark, as well. Hundreds of invitations were sent to both journalists, city council members and various members of the scientific community. More than 300 people attended, among them several professors from the Engineering College of Aarhus.

Despite prohibiting filming or any other documentation of Sadek's presentation, over an hour of video the presentation was pieced together from several hidden video- and sound recorders. This is that presentation and the Sadek-Harrit exchange.