wtc7 simulation
911dust Sun, 03/13/2011 - 8:10pm
NIST's S. Shyam Sunder on What Controlled Demolition Looks Like
How can we honestly discuss science if we do not pay careful attention to logic?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_fallacies
Paradoxically, the logical fallacies get little attention, but they are among the most useful of tools for thinking clearly about 9/11.
For instance, the basic "appeal to unqualified authority" helps short-circuit NIST's injection of possibly false information into the debate.
A couple of videos that point out fallacies in NIST's reasoning:
Sunder on What Controlled Demolition Looks Like
http://bit.ly/Sunder_on_What_Controlled_Demolition_Looks_Like
We Have the Results and Only We Have the Results
http://bit.ly/We_Have_the_Results_and_Only_We_Have_the_Results