You really don't know what happened on 9/11... just so you know... you need to admit that, otherwise you're being dishonest with yourself, and everyone else you interact with with regards to 9/11. Jim Hoffman does not support the OCT, and I think it's disingenuous of you to state that he does. He does not promote theories that have a multitide of contradictions to them like you and others do, and he especially doesn't promote them as fact like you and others do.

You don't know what kind of investigating I have done over the years. Making phone calls, corresponding through email, etc... I hear about the kind of "investigating" some of those you mentioned have done, and to see you proclaim them as "heroes" is really laughable. When have they ever supported the families in their endeavors? When have they ever supported the responders in their endeavors? I could find you 1000 threads from me supporting both. I doubt you'd be able to find one from any of them.

I understand all too well how corrupt the "entire system is." If you actually listened to the interview, you would have heard me say that the reason I am taking part in "Peace Of The Action" is because I have tried to bring justice and accountability for the 9/11 attacks for almost 8 years and have had no success doing so using the "system."

The real heroes of this movement are the family members, first responders, whistleblowers, and ACTUAL researchers like Paul Thompson, Steven Jones, Michael C. Ruppert, Kevin Ryan, Jim Hoffman, John Judge...

Your post is an appalling example of how misguided some people have become in regards to 9/11 truth.

________________________
The key to successful truth actions lies in not insulting your target audience or promoting speculation as hard fact.

Why not tell me what you stand for then wrt 9/11 truth and justice and what IS the common thread then?

Just one word of warning about the names you chose to support or to attack.

I know as well as I can see my hand in front of my face that Rob Balsamo is spreading dis info in his latest film "9/11: World Trade Centre Attack" many others should be speaking out about this but I don't know of to many that have even seen this film.

WE must judge others by what they do and achieve for our cause of exposing the lies of 9/11.

Judge me on my record.

There will be an article coming soon exposing Balsamo and his no "767-200" hit the towers because of the impossible speed.

Unfortunately there is dis info out there and sometimes the wrong people are fingered, be careful who you support or you will be discredited by your association.

Kind regards John

9/11 24/7 UNTIL JUSTICE!!
www.truthaction.org.au

To respond to some of these comments: I agree and disagree with different things Sheila says, but as I know her in person, I can assure you she is not a troll or a provocateur, even if, in the simple sense, her comments "provoked."

First of all, I admire that her heart is bleeding for the millions of Iraqis and Afghans who have been killed and are continuing to be killed. And yes it is indeed true that there are roughly 500 Iraqis killed for every one person killed on 9/11.

I do NOT agree that it's "racist" for a particular activist to focus on the family members and first responders more proportionately than the Afghans or Iraqis being killed. Jon Gold is, at core, an anti-war activist in the big picture, not just a narrower 9/11 activist. Incidentally, this is another spot on which I disagree with wtcdemolition.com, which has accused 911blogger of being "Islamophobic." They say, and Sheila was echoing, the sentiment that anyone who believes anything less than "mihop" is still propping up the Islamofascist myth, and hence fueling the wars to continue.

However, there are many anti-war activists out there who don't buy into 9/11 truth at all --- and in some cases even insist that our movement serves to "discredit" the anti-war movement by making it look wacky --- and they understand that our foreign policy is racist and that all our troops need to come home now.

I do agree that some of the real heroes of the 9/11 truth movement are the ones who have done their own investigating. While many of us remain in the mode of "Hey, we're just asking questions and demanding a new investigation," some people are not satisfied with staying in this mode forever. Indeed many of us are indeed skeptical such an investigation will come any year or decade soon. As such, some people have already initiated this new investigation themselves on a citizen level, even without subpoena powers, etc.

For example, contrary to Gold's opinion that discussing and promoting the work of CIT "tacks on years to this cause," I think if anything it has subtracted years. Imagine, hypothetically, if the population rose up today, by the millions, in the streets, and demanded a new investigation. And, let's really put on the rose colored glasses, for the sake of this example, and imagine that this investigation not only happened, but was completely immune to infiltration and compromise. When it comes time to subpoena in some witnesses... hey! CIT has already provided so much ground work. We have such a plethora of witness testimony, on location and on film, which clues us in to what happened. Witness testimony we wouldn't have if it weren't for Craig and Aldo. Yes, they do draw conclusions, which makes some people uncomfortable (after all, drawing conclusions is for "conspiracy theorists," right?). But their work is to absolutely 100% be commended.

Indeed, EVERYONE doing their own thing and taking their own personal approach to this cause should be absolutely 100% commended.

"It's not a cause, it's a crime scene" Cheri Roberts