I didn't suggest anyone should be doing or saying anything, but rather simply explained why many of us do and say what Jon argued we shouldn't. Also, calling the demolition of the WTC buildings a "compelling hypothesis" is akin to referring to biological evolution as such, and of course people who've vested their faith in stories to the contrary resent being told they're wrong, but I contend that's a lame excuse to shy away from the truth. In fact, I contend there's no legitimate excuse for shying away from the truth, in regard to 9/11 or otherwise.

As for Jon's list, it starts out with the hundreds of pages of dis/mis-info and fluff which is the 9/11 Commission Report obstructing the way to the truth. Beyond that, while I appreciate the rest of the information he compiled in his list, I could forgive a newbie for wading through it all only to come out with the misguided notion that the official story, while the leaving many loose ends, presents an overall narrative which is generally correct. So, I'll continue recommending newcomers to 911review.com instead, as that website provides the most accessible yet thorough debunking of the official conspiracy theory that I've come across.