who decides to call into this show - be careful - it is the goal of organized disruption to create chaos and articial disputes.

remain calm and simply state that the 9/11 Truth movement does not advocate their work.

Try to not personally attack them. That is what they want - and that is what they are designed to do - make us all look like a bunch of angry upset crazy people.

Simply state that they do not represent the interests of this movement or the victim's families or represent any credible line of research.

I would direct questions to the moderator - and ask why they would even invite these two on the air when there are so many credible researchers out there. Attempt to embarass the interviewer.

And why are you hosting this crap?

Move on.

Now That You Know, What Can You Do?

911Blogger.com Activism Section
___________________________________

"It was all about finding a way to do it. That was the tone of it. The president saying ‘Go find me a way to do this."

Is this person someone who posts here?

great show.

New article link just added to st911.org, details the HAARP device in Alaska:

Background of the HAARP Project

Prepared by Rosalie Bertell, Ph.D., GNSH

I will tell you why...

How many of you have read the book "The Guns of August?"

It details all the strategy of all the top generals in World War 1 - and how they all expected to win - quick and clean.

Unfortunately - all of their military expertize and theories were based on the LAST big war - and was obsolete. They all failed to take into consideration the advent of new technology (namely mechanized machine guns) - and the war became bogged down in a tragic trench warfare model.

I believe this particular brand of cointelpro that Fetzer and Wood and all the useful idiots who promote it is based on the LAST big war - the 1960s. But what they have failed to take into account AGAIN is the advent of new technology - the information age - the information superhighway.

Simply put - this model of cointelpro cannot work in the information age. In fact, its kinda patheticly weak.

So - what we have here is another example of the 'opposition's grasp exceeding its reach. Like their dellusional PNAC writings that ridiculously believed that they could subjugate an entire nation through a "new Pearl Harbor" - and their shortsighted belief that they could subjugate Iraq - and their shortsighted belief that they could spread american empire around the world - they are making the same tragic mistake here. They are expediting their own demise.

This silly pathetic excuse for organized disruption is soon to become a liability to them. Not only are they making laughingstocks of themselves - they are EXPOSING themselves and providing us with yet one more smoking gun to exploit.

Do you smell that Fetzer? Its blood in the water. The truth is circling like sharks, and i pity the fool who thinks he can throw more lies into the water to appease them.

Just wanted to apologize to all who entered the Skypecast and text chat who did not get a chance to speak or have their questions addressed I was having major problems with Skype and juggling many things at once, normally it runs much smoother then that.

That being said, I also want folks to know that we extend an open invitation to ANYONE on here at 911blogger.com to be the primary guest on our format, so that you can voice your position as well.

If interested, contact me at http://911blog.org I am user "Phillynet", or contact me via Skype, my Skype username is "glptechradio2"

I can accomodate you as a "Guest" on our show through Skype or standard phone, (I would call you if long distance is an issue)

Today on the Alex Jones show! W00T!

Thanks Jeff!

Below is a hi-res picture of the hole in the roof of WTC5...

It needs no words and to me is CONCLUSIVE proof that the damage on the roof was not done by a disintegration ray.

Below is the original picture...

Interview of Prof. James Fetzer and Dr. Judy Wood Nov. 30th 2006

http://911blog.org/?q=node/159

http://thepiratebay.org/tor/3568874

In reading through all of the haggling back and forth, it would appear there is tremendous personal investment on everyone's part. IMHO, those attacking appear to have the most to lose. I have not been an active researcher like many who are staking their positions here, but I do try to look at the factual information and the logic to the thinking.

In the case of the star wars beam proposition, it would appear to be looking at the loss of material, the problems with the ground shaking, the basement structure that, had it fallen apart, would have cause tremendous damage to the subway system in Lower Manhattan. Further, it looks at the unusual visual evidence at the site itself (that being the unusual holes in WTC 5 and 6) as well as evidence away from the site.

Now, I am sure that any number for folks will try to beat my post silly. Don't waste your time. The purpose of this effort is expose those who perpetrated these events. The main effort should continue to be to get more people to think about those things that were impossible. Once folks have "awakened", then let them all look at the various research and see what makes the most sense and takes into account the most data. I think everyone that is truly interested in exposing the truth should encourage any and all viewpoints, not just those that support their "staked" position.

Come on folks, we shouldn't be fighting each other, we should be encouraging more folks to give their own perspectives. Read more, think more, bicker less, waste less energy being eggheads with personal vendettas. No one wins if the truth is not exposed?

New pictures and descriptions of toasted cars

http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/StarWarsBeam5.html

Note that this paper was written in 1982

Document created: 21 February 01
Air University Review, March-April 1982

The Strategic Value of
Space-Based Laser Weapons

Dr. Barry J. Smernoff

some excerpts:

Laser weapons, based in space and capable of the global projection of power to attack a wide range of targets—satellites, aircraft, and missiles—have attracted an increasing level of attention during the past several years.

The advent of space laser weapons during this decade might make a military and geopolitical virtue out of technological necessity.

Operating at a level of approximately $200 million per year, the U.S. high-energy laser (HEL) program has been the single largest technology base program sponsored by the Department of Defense (DOD) during the past five years. This fact signals both its relative importance within the broad portfolio of military research and development programs and the favorable expectations associated with it.

In many important ways, the evolution of space laser weapons in the United States during the 1980s may prove to be quite similar to the development of the ICBM during the 1950s.

Full Paper Here

http://www.airpower.maxwell.af.mil/airchronicles/aureview/1982/mar-apr/smernoff.html

The Space Laser Business Model
Industrial Productivity/Manufacturing Technology

Originating Technology/ NASA Contribution

Creating long-duration, high-powered lasers, for satellites, that can withstand the type of optical misalignment and damage dished out by the unforgiving environment of space, is work that is unique to NASA. It is complicated, specific work, where each step forward is into uncharted territory.

Full Article Here

http://www.sti.nasa.gov/tto/Spinoff2005/ip_8.html

Using Lasers in Space
Laser Orbital Debris Removal and Asteroid Deflection

Jonathan W. Campbell, Colonel, USAFR
December 2000

PDF FILE

http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/cst/csat20.pdf

E-Weapons: Directed Energy Warfare In The 21st Century

By Leonard David
Senior Space Writer
posted: 11 January 2006
07:01 am ET

LOS ALAMOS, New Mexico -- There is a new breed of weaponry fast approaching—and at the speed of light no less. They are labeled "directed-energy weapons" and may well signal a revolution in military hardware—perhaps more so than the atomic bomb.

The High Energy Laser Systems Test Facility (HELSTF) is the ideal choice to host exploration of future laser technologies. Appointed the US Army Space and Missile Defense Command's (SMDC) "Directed Energy Center for Test and Evaluation," HELSTF boasts a unique infrastructure with extensive capabilities for ground-based directed energy testing and evaluation. Located on White Sands Missile Range, in southern New Mexico, HELSTF has access to 3,200 square miles of controlled land and 7,000 square miles of controlled air space in which to conduct live fire, lethality, and vulnerability testing, as well as laser/material interactions.

Full Article Here

http://helstf-www.wsmr.army.mil

REMARKS OF
U.S. REP. JOHN N. HOSTETTLER

Accession Number : ADA151279

Title : High Energy Lasers: A Primer on Directed Energy Weapons for Space Use.

Descriptive Note : Master's thesis,

Corporate Author : NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY CA

Personal Author(s) : Ziska,R. F.

Report Date : SEP 1984

Pagination or Media Count : 86

Abstract Here

Air University Review, July-August 1984

Introducing the Particle-Beam Weapon

Dr. Richard M. Roberds

CONSIDERABLE debate has been stirred Cby President Reagan's recent suggestion that the United States embark on a program that would use advanced-technology weaponry to produce an effective defense against Soviet ICBMS. On the one hand, critics argue that the idea of a defensive system that would neutralize the ICBM threat is naive and, at best, would require large expenditures in the development of a very "high-risk" technology. Furthermore, they suggest, even if such a system could be developed, it would be too costly and would also be vulnerable to simple and cheap countermeasures. On the other hand, others argue that we must continue to explore such high-technology options until they have been either proved scientifically unachievable or developed into effective systems. If it were possible to build and effectively deploy such weapons, the payoff in terms of national security would be tremendous. And certainly, if this weaponry is achievable, it must be the United States, not the Soviet Union, that first develops it.

FULL ARTICLE HERE

http://www.airpower.maxwell.af.mil/airchronicles/aureview/1984/jul-aug/roberds.html

Millimeter-wave energy to be used in a weapon
Peter Clarke
EE Times (06/06/2001 2:02 PM EST)
LONDON — Stories of the soldiers who operate the Arctic radar stations and stand in front of the transmitter to get warm will surely be repeated now that the U.S. Department of Defense has gone public with plans to use the heating effect of millimeter waves within a weapon.   The U.S. Marine Corps says it has developed a 95-GHz system as an antipersonnel "heat ray" and is conducting tests on animals and volunteers. The supposedly nonlethal weapon, called "active-denial technology," has been in the works for the last 10 years at the Air Force Research Laboratory (Kirtland, N.M.), in tandem with the Marine Corps' Joint Non-lethal Weapons Directorate. About $40 million has been spent developing the weapon, according to the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL), although it could be nearly another decade before it is used in conflict. The earliest estimate for deployment is 2009.   [Comment from CB: Let's remember.. the military is always at least 15-20 years ahead from what they publicize. So, subtract 15 years from 2009 for a more reasonable year.]

FULL ARTICLE HERE

http://www.eetimes.com/story/OEG20010606S0072

It looks as if a gigantic "mouth" bit off a chunk, doesn't it?

Where did it all go? What happened?

(Picture Source )