Information Clearing House has published an even straighter piece by Paul Craig Roberts. Hopefully, more high profile former and current officials will follow his lead as the situation gets so obviously critical.

A Wake-up Call

By Paul Craig Roberts

07/19/07 "ICH" -- -- This is a wake-up call that we are about to have another 9/11-WMD experience.

The wake-up call is unlikely to be effective, because the American attitude toward government changed fundamentally seventy-odd years ago. Prior to the 1930s, Americans were suspicious of government, but with the arrival of the Great Depression, Tojo, and Hitler, President Franklin D. Roosevelt convinced Americans that government existed to protect them from rapacious private interests and foreign threats. Today, Americans are more likely to give the benefit of the doubt to government than they are to family members, friends, and those who would warn them about the government’s protection.

Intelligent observers are puzzled that President Bush is persisting in a futile and unpopular war at the obvious expense of his party’s electoral chances in 2008.

Perhaps 9/11Truthers should think seriously about starting their own political party and nominating a candidate for President for 2008. There are enough of us. Perhaps even mainstream and disenfranchised voters might be persuaded to vote for a 9/11Truth prez candidate on the basis of a campaign to get a real 9/11 investigation going.

Although he wasn't granted the same floor time as Moe, Larry, and Curly....I mean McCain, Romney, and Guliani, Ron Paul held his own fantastically. His answer to "Don't ask Don't Tell" regarding gays in the military was brilliant as he reminded us that classifying people into groups to begin with disregards the 1st amendment, and is a topic that shouldn't even be an issue.

This MSNBC shows Ron Paul after 30,000 votes, has 60% of the vote for who did best, with ALL the rest in single digit percentages.

I encourage all to chime in at this poll, http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18963731/,
Pay close attention to the questions since 2 of them ask "Who had the most rehearsed answers?" and "Who avoided the questions?", both of which Guiliani scored highest, and Ron Paul finshed 4th behind the top 3 spectacles.

I had a great time with Cosmos on his show, I hope you all enjoy it. We talked about our upcoming Vancouver conference, activism, truth squad confrontation, and breaking the left/right paradigm among other things;

http://mp3.wtprn.com/TRR07.html
Mon., June 4, 2007
http://mp3.wtprn.com/TRR/0706/20070604_Mon_TRR.mp3

There's alot more to the conference that we didn't get a chance to talk about, please visit www.v911truth.org for a full list of presenters and material.

Webster Tarpley on Rense: Truth Squads can overpower MSM - tonight 11pm-1am ET

How to Beat the Odds: 9/11 Truth Squads

Webster Tarpley is a creative political strategist with inspired ideas how to get to a 9/11 Truth breakthrough. It's an urgent matter with him, not so much about research into history, as the making of history - saving the world from the "neocon fascist madmen."

As an activist, Tarpley always looks for the most effective tactics - the "most bang for the buck," as he likes to say.

When I first met Webster in 2004 he was promoting an Independent International Truth Commission on 9/11. It would be modeled on the Bertrand Russell War Crimes Tribunal, which played such a role in mobilizing the world's intellectuals against the Vietnam war. The IITC is still an excellent idea with great potential and well worth pursuing.

Last year, Webster's innovation was to mobilize 9/11 truth troops to call in to talk radio shows and beat the drum for C-Span's broadcast of the Los Angeles Neo-Con 9/11 agenda panel. It was a roaring success. So many people tuned in that C-Span aired the panel four times, making it the most popular program in their history.

The 9/11 Truth Movement is a novel creature. Born by inevitable reactive consequence from back-room treason, which was itself nurtured by our own longstanding political complacency, which again in turn masked an underlying sense of helplessness, which yet again in turn was, I believe, scientifically inculcated within us over decades by practitioners of Bernays' cynical manipulativeness (and which can be traced back still further, by the serious historian), it is at once both a grim and desperate challenge as well as a unique opportunity to radically alter our country's destiny. More about that later. For now, let's look at where we've gotten so far.

The story of the 9/11 Truth Movement thus far (March 2007, as I write this) is largely, though not entirely, a story taking place on the left side of the political divide. So let's look there first.

“We are not deceived by their pretenses to piety. We have seen their kind before. They are the heirs of all the murderous ideologies of the 20th century. By sacrificing human life to serve their radical visions--by abandoning every value except the will to power--they follow in the path of fascism, and Nazism, and totalitarianism. And they will follow that path all the way to where it ends: in history's unmarked grave of discarded lies.”

— George W. Bush, Address to a Joint Session of Congress and the American People, September 20, 2001

So who is participating in the 911 cover-up.

The entire mainstream media. Literally hundreds of TV stations, and newspapers, weekly news magazines, the wire services, and a few hundred radio stations, not only in the USA, but in Britain, Australia, and much of Western Europe. These people are either totally unreliable, too stupid to see what is right in front of them, or too scared to do their jobs properly. Would you ever again trust any reporter who decided to support the official government conspiracy, even though he/she knew it was a cavalcade of lies, because that person was afraid of losing their income?

Three magazine sites were created by the founder of Wikipedia. One's on entertainment, one's on local news, and one's on politics. I link the one on politics, because I think it will be of most interest to this group.

Also, at some point in time, I had thought about creating a wiki site on Wikia to serve the 9/11 Truth Movement. The idea was to have a wiki dedicated to responding to mainstream media hit pieces. We don't have one spokes person, and many views differ, but it may be a good way to get a quality response together to articles we disagree with. That one could be by invite only.

I created one entry. Get an account, and "digg" it up!

An excerpt from a Ralph Schoenman speech on the false flag aspects of the events of September 11, 2001.

should say 175, not 75 .....

Please comment...

"Anti-Americanism from abroad would not be such a problem if Americans were united in standing up for their own country. But in this country itself, there are those who blame America for most of the evils in the world."
- Dinesh D'Souza, 2003.

"In this book I make a claim that will seem startling at the outset. The cultural left in this country is responsible for causing 9/11."
- Dinesh D'Souza, 2007.

Introduction

Conservative author Dinesh D'Souza has a new book out, "The Enemy at Home: The Cultural Left and Its Responsibility for 9/11". D'Souza's thesis may come as some surprise to you. Perhaps you thought that "Islamofascists" were responsible for 9/11, or maybe you hold the somewhat contrarian view that 9/11 was a case of "blowback", and America's foreign policy is to blame. Could be that you view 9/11 as an obvious PsyOp, directed at the American people to catalyze public opinion into supporting the WAR ON TERROR!™

Well, turns out we're all wrong. In this new polemic, D'Souza pins the crime of 9/11 ultimately on the "cultural left" of the United States, one of the most starkly anti-American positions to be publicly taken by a pundit of the Left or Right in this country.

The fact that D'Souza's overall thesis is wrong on its face should not dissuade clever critics on the Left from showering his book with scorn, and so far that has indeed been the case. The first volley was lobbed from blogger Michael Bérubé, then James Wolcott of Vanity Fair, followed by a short burst from Mark Warren posted at Powell's. These were mere drops, and now an online search reveals a host of criticism directed at D'Souza's latest. To date, the best face-to-face mocking of D'Souza was delivered on The Colbert Report.

And, of course, the world would not be perfect without a sycophantic/hagiographic lavishing of praise for D'Souza from the typically worthless NewsMax.com. (Ok, I admit it, the NewsMax review isn't TOTALLY sycophantic.)

Although the inevitable exchanges of rhetoric being generated due to the publishing of this volume are sure to make entertaining reading, (and watching), the audience taking in this futile fusillade is merely watching a dumb show without a program, and will be left none the wiser for the next act.

Ask David: 9/11, Smoking Ban, Cannabis, PR - webcameron.org.uk

Looks like Cameron totally skirted the subject, and most likely didn't even read the trailer notes for 9/11:Press for Truth. Go check it out, post some comments here and there.

Thanks 911veritas for the heads up!

100 Hours Legislative Survey - dccc.org

Your input on the issues that are most important to you will help us formulate our strategy and guide our work in the first weeks of the new Congress.
..
What other issues would you like the 110th Congress to take up in the first 100 Hours?

Take a few minutes to send in your 2 cents as to what the new Congress should really be working on.

Thanks Randy for the suggestion!

Subpoena Power, Congressional Hearings, and Special Counsel

Ed Haas, Muckraker Report, Nov. 7, 2006

If (as of 0527 Central, not an "if" - rep.) the Democrats take control of the House of Representatives as a result of today’s elections, Americans need to immediately launch an aggressive letter writing campaign to the new Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA 8th), requesting swift congressional hearings on the following topics:

· Bush Administration’s prior knowledge of 9/11 attacks

· Events of September 11, 2001

· Pre-war faulty intelligence that was used to justify invading Iraq, and whether the Bush Administration purposely misrepresented intelligence

· War profiteering

· Illegal wiretaps

· Torture

Continued...

It’s down to the wire and Democratic 9/11 truth candidate Dr. Bob Bowman has a shot at winning a congressional seat in Florida’s 15th district.

If you want to have an independent 9/11 investigation this is your best chance.

Bob needs money for last minute advertising. He doesn’t take any from lobbyists or corporate interests and his incumbent opponent does.

I’m flat broke and I gave him money.

Talk is cheap, Contribute

Interview: Bruce Marshall, U.S. House Candidate - Vermont Public Radio

As part of VPR's continuing midterm election coverage we're speaking with a wide variety of candidates for statewide office.

Today, Green Party candidate for the US House Bruce Marshall talks with Mitch Wertlieb about the central issue of his campaign, which he says is more important than anything any of the major party candidates or the mainstream media is willing to talk about.

Mr. Marshall gets straight to the point in this 6 minute long interview with Vermont Public Radio. Marshall's central reason for running is to expose the lies surrounding 9/11.

You can find the 3MB MP3 of the interview via the link above, or archived at 911podcasts here.

Please note that we have added a banner in the action items section which lists all 9/11 candidates, please do your best to help them however you can!