Vancouver 9/11 Truth's founding member Rukshana gave a short, but very potent and memorable statement at the David Ray Griffin event on May 16th, 2007. She spoke in particular to media cowardice and coverups. and their lack of journalistic integrity in reporting on 9/11.

This came after DRG had spoken and many may have missed it. Those who did hear it have raved about it, so we have seperated it and made it available to download from our website.

It is only about 5 minutes long and just 1.3 MBs, but well worth the listen.

Download:
http://www.v911truth.org/audio/Rukshana.Vancouver.911.Truth-DavidRayGriffin.05.16.07.mp3

Enjoy

(Watch a video of the report at the link - http://www.channel4.com/news/articles/politics/international_politics/quarrel+over+sarkozy+appointment/590547)

Last Modified: 06 Jul 2007
By: Channel 4 News

A storm is brewing after French president Nicolas Sarkozy has appointed someone who believes George Bush was behind the September 11 attacks.

A transatlantic storm is brewing over one of the appointments to President Sarkozy's new cabinet - he appears to have given senior office to someone who thinks President Bush may have been responsible for 9/11.

It's well known that websites, books and films which challenge the official version of what happened on September 11th 2001 have proved seductive to millions, and nowhere more so than in France. For Mr Sarkozy, and his ambitions to draw closer to the United States, it may prove something of an embarrassment.

(dz: be sure to note StopLying's blog entry on how this event came to fruition!)

9/11 an 'inside job'?
Controlled demolition, claims California architect

Conspiracy buffs are in for a big treat.

California architect Richard Gage will be in Winnipeg this week to offer his explanation of why the World Trade Centre towers collapsed on Sept. 11, 2001.

Gage has become a leading figure of the so-called 9/11 truth movement, an informal campaign from people all over the world who challenge official accounts of what happened that day.

He argues that a deliberate, controlled demolition using explosive devices is what really destroyed the twin towers that day, along with another skyscraper known as WTC 7 or Building 7. Speaking to Sun Media from his Bay Area home this weekend, Gage said few people are even aware of the third building.

'SMOKING GUN'

From an article by David Roupe
U.S. Military Wanted to Provoke War With Cuba
U.S. Military Drafted Plans to Terrorize U.S. Cities to Provoke War With Cuba

by David Ruppe

Global Research, May 26, 2007
ABC News

Global Research Editor's Note

The mainstream media is now acknowledging "Operation Northwoods", a (declassified) secret plan to kill innocent civilians: The objective was to "create a useful wave of indignation", blame Fidel Castro for the civilian deaths, with a view to building a pretext to invade Cuba.

This sounds familiar does it not? Northwoods was a dress rehearsal of 9/11. A mass casuality producing event involving citizens is used to galvanize public support for waging war on Afghanistan in 2001.

While 911 researchers have extensively analysed the logic of Operation Northwoods, its links to 9/11 and its role in the construction of the "Global War on Terrorism" the mainstream media has largely remained silent.

Michel Chossudovsky, 26 May 2007

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

One of the most 'controversial' chapters to appear in any 9/11 book, was written by Barrie Zwicker in his 'Towers of Deception'. This 'controversial' but true, accurate and highly education chapter has found its way onto the internet, and has been reproduced as far as I can see word for word and illustration for illustration. So if you would like to analyze the methods of propaganda, and dissect through the obfuscation here are the links:

http://www.geocities.com/agent_noam_chomsky/chomsky.htm
http://www.geocities.com/agent_noam_chomsky/chomsky2.htm
http://www.geocities.com/agent_noam_chomsky/chomsky.htm3

Here are two reviews of the book from Amazon.com, which particularly mention this specific chapter as forming the basis of opinion concerning the book, and the review written about it:

The first reader gives the book 2 Starts out of 5 (2/5):
I gave the book two stars mainly because Zwicker's treatment of Noam Chomsky, with its continual oscillation between fawning adulation and vituperative disgust, is worth a read.

The second reder gives the book 5 Starts out of 5 (5/5):

Six 9/11 related films in Google’s Top 100

#1 Farenheit 911
#4 911 September 11 World Trade Center Pentagon Flight 93 911 Truth
#7 David Ray Griffin - 911 Commission Report: Ommissions and Distortions
#8 Loose Change Japanese
#19 9/11 Revisited: Were explosives used?
#41 Loose Change 2E

Clearly there is momentum, worldwide.

How will the controlled media finally succumb to the pressure?

How will the perpetrators react?

Should we not try to anticipate their next moves?

Also, I am reposting psychiatrist Carol Wolman's article. It's brilliant. http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_carol_wo_070217_why_the_resistan...

Also, thanks to GW for his terrific blogs.

If your friends and family are too skepitcal to spend time investigating 9/11 for themselves, perhaps a simple questions and answers session is the best approach, backed up with links for further reading, often using Wikipedia. I Dedicate this blog to my brother, whose main objection to the idea of a conspiracy is the question concerning the French Newspaper Le Monde.

The Government would never kill their own people, would they? Conspiracies are just a new Internet-fad thing.

A philosopher once wrote:

Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it

On last night's Paula Zahn Now on CNN, the entire show was focused on the Don Imus debacle. Within that show, however, they had a small segment about outspoken celebrities and whether they should "shut up" or not. It went a little something like this...

1. Mel Gibson gets drunk and says Jews are the source of all evil in the world.

2. Kramer from Seinfeld, Michael Richards, goes crazy in a comedy club and routinely uses the word "nigger" to blacks in his audience in order to make them feel inferior.

3. Ann Coulter says she can't talk about John Edwards lest she use the word "faggot" to describe him.

4. Rosie O'Donnell claims explosions caused WTC7 to fall, rather than planes.

If anyone has the resources to dig up a clip of the segment, it would be greatly appreciated. I was expecting them to bring Rosie up, but a small part of me thought it would be too pathetic for even the mainstream media to do. I guess I was wrong.

Please click the following link for the entire article, including all supporting hyperlinks, as well as to leave a message of support:
http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=597

This message is addressed to all the deniers and nay sayers who have spent almost six years swearing to the lies of the official story of 9/11. It is high time to throw down the gauntlet and dare you to confront the questions that have to be answered. Consider it done

You won’t let us speak to you in public and you won’t attend our events. So tell me, who exactly is running and hiding…and why? It sure as hell is not any of us in the 9/11 truth movement. We’ve been out there with the facts and evidence just waiting for you to respond and show us where we are wrong and you are right, face to face and in public! Not one of you has ever responded and we’re damn tired of waiting.

In the sense of "there's no such thing as negative publicity".

Right now, the only way we are getting pretty much any press in the so-called "mainstream media" is negative press. (except for the now occasional things like Sheen, Rosey, etc., which will only continue in quantity and quality over time)

Which is better than nothing.

At least it is letting people know that there are people out here fighting for Truth and Justice, no matter how those who are making it "newsworthy" are portraying it. (and making people think about 9/11 and not letting it wither and die in people's minds, which is also happening at this late date (barring the references the Bush-ites make now and then, which tend to be very vague and truly referential in a simple way rather than expansive or specific in detail -- in fact, I bet they wish the mainstream press would quit making a big deal about Rosie, et al.))

Here is an archived article from CNN describing how Cheney took charge on 9/11. I find it is important to go back and re-read old articles as new insights are gained. Several interesting paragraphs from the horses mouth. "It was a clear day, there were no weather problems, and then we saw the second airplane hit in real time," Cheney told CNN's John King in an interview in the vice president's office. "At that moment, you knew this was a deliberate act. This was a terrorist act." So Cheney, being in charge, had plenty of time to scramble jets over DC, knowing the country is under attack. ""My [Secret Service] agent all of a sudden materialized right beside me and said, 'Sir, we have to leave now.' He grabbed me and propelled me out of my office, down the hall, and into the underground shelter in the White House," Cheney said. In White House terminology, it is the PEOC, short for the Presidential Emergency Operations Center." Confirmed again, Cheney was definately in the PEOC very shortly after 2nd plane impact.

The government would have us believe that they themselves were both incompetent and brilliant within the same 8 hour period on September 11, 2001.

8:14 to 8:20 a.m. - American Airlines Flight 11 goes off course and is hijacked.

9:37 a.m. - Pentagon gets hit.

(Timeline information courtesy of http://www.911timeline.net/)

That’s an hour and 17 minutes (77 minutes) between the time the first plane was hijacked and when flight 77 allegedly hit the pentagon.

I’ve seen the graphics for “Twin Towers Have a Posse” which I initially thought was an awesome idea. The “Andre has a Posse” meme was prevalent everywhere; people spread that ridiculous thing like chain letters. It’s a good concept, but I feel we need to integrate with the anti-war movement. Thus I propose: America Has a Posse.

People accuse the 9/11 movement as being self-righteous conspiracy theorists. We can’t let them frame the debate. They are just trying to cow us into submission; if they accuse us of being overly patriotic or appealing to morality, why shouldn’t we engage in those behaviors more vigorously? We must speak more about taking back the country, regardless of political affiliation, getting honest Americans into governance and peacefully take the reigns of power from the corrupt legislative and executive branches of government. Thus, America Has a Posse.

I, of course, stress voting Democratic in November, but after that my allegiance to the Democratic Party is over unless I see some serious actions to admonish and investigate the Bush/Republican wrongdoings, including a new investigation into 9/11. If the Democrats actually act honorably, I promise I will chill a little bit.

Who said only the mainstream media are capable of doing propaganda??

We can do it too... :-)

UW Extension cut protested

Donation matches amount withheld by Ozaukee board in 9-11 dispute

By DAN BENSON
dbenson@journalsentinel.com
Posted: Oct. 12, 2006

A Texas woman who says the U.S. government orchestrated the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks has taken on the Ozaukee County Board and its decision to cut money from the University of Wisconsin Extension budget to protest a UW-Madison professor.

Cait Burgess, 35, of Forth Worth raised $8,427 - much of it her own money - and donated it to a scholarship fund for needy UW-Madison students.

That is the amount UW-Madison pays Kevin Barrett to teach a class on Islam in which he discusses his views that the World Trade Center attack was deliberately staged by the Bush administration.

Burgess said she raised money through a Web site after she read about the Ozaukee County Board's 18-11 approval in August of a resolution to cut funding to the county UW Extension program by the same amount UW-Madison is paying Barrett. The UW Extension is a separate institution of the UW System.

"I heard about the Kevin Barrett issue, and it upset me. I thought that it was incredibly wrong" what the Ozaukee County Board did, said Burgess, who works part-time running a Web design business from her home.