Willie Nelson: Twin Towers Were Imploded On 9/11
American icon tells Alex Jones Show he questions official story

Digg: http://digg.com/world_news/Willie_Nelson_Twin_Towers_Were_Imploded_On_9_11_3

http://prisonplanet.com/articles/february2008/020408_towers_imploded.htm

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Monday, February 4th, 2008

Architect Paul Laffoley reveals integral demolition charges designed into the World Trade Center. Laffoley has lived a long and wonderful life. Date of interview: November 12th, 2007. The WTC part runs from about 24:00 to 37:00 minutes. (P.S. Someone get Freeman's permission to mirror the file.)
http://freemantv.liber.us/2007/11/12/paul-laffoley-interview/

Emery Roth and Sons employed Laffoley in its WTC design group. Laffoley reports, "I got assigned floors 15 to 45 in tower two." One of his ideas was so liked that it almost won approval. His connecting bridges would have been a major alteration.

Laffoley says chief architect Minoru Yamasaki "was into pure, exaggerated capitalism....He was the one that got the Bin Laden construction company started....He trained them in his style....So he...had them work on the World Trade Center...."

Freeman: "You say the Bin Ladens were working on the trade towers?"

"I'm confident that they'll find the cause of this," said Gene Corley, a private engineer who has investigated numerous disasters including the World Trade Center collapse on Sept. 11, 2001.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2007-08-05-minnesotabridge_N.htm

"We normally don't like to get involved unless we have assurances that we are given a free hand to really perform a thorough and totally unbiased investigation..." Velivasakis says.

His firm, Thornton Tomasetti, specializes in stabilizing disaster sites and determining why structures collapse.

http://minnesota.publicradio.org/display/web/2007/10/22/investigator/

I couldn't figure out how to display this image in the blog, but here's the link:

Look familiar?

These are characteristic features indicating the use of explosives:
1) Outward arching dust plumes
2) Formation of debris cloud that is symmetrical around the vertical axis of the structure
3) Heavier material is propelled out ahead of the dust

I have been spending the last few hours trying to come up with a way to compare the explosive forces between the '93 bomb and the plane impacts of 2001. However, my lack of expertise in this area of physics, pertaining to kinetic energy, explosive force, pressure, etc. is preventing me from making any sort of informed conclusion. On the other hand the information I have gathered suggests ( and I use that term lightly) that a bomb ( on the order of magnitude used in the '93 bombings: The bomb exploded in the underground garage at 12:17 P.M., generating a pressure estimated over one GPa (Giga Pascal) and opening a 30-meter-wide (98 foot) hole through four sublevels of concrete. The detonation velocity of this bomb was about 15,000 ft/s (4.5 km/s). Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Trade_Center_1993_bombings#Bomb_characteristics) planted in the sub-level basement (which houses the critical main support for the tower) had a much larger probability of collapsing the building than an impact of a 767 carrying 10,000 gallons of jet fuel nearly 1,000 feet up from the basement.

http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2007/09/top-down-demolition.html

One of the main arguments defenders of the official story have made against the controlled demolition of the Twin Towers is that demolitions never start at the top of the building. In other words, they claim that demolitions always start at the bottom and proceed upwards.

However, a new video shows an example of a top-down demolition of another building:

http://ia341239.us.archive.org/2/items/911_News_Clips/V08546-24.mpg_from24.11.54.400000_to24.12.59.000000_fox5_wtc1_demoli...

from: http://911blogger.com/node/10830

Someone read her on-screen notes a bit too literally.

Was WTC7 a Controlled Demolition?
By Matt Hutaff, Sep 18, 2007
http://www.thesimon.com/magazine/articles/canon_fodder/01435_was_wtc7_controlled_demolition.html

When a reporter hears a building fall 23 minutes before it does, is there a sound?

The view from BBC reporter Jane Standley's window was a spectacular mess. Thick plumes of smoke rose above the New York City skyline, blotting out sunlight and choking the morale of rescue workers trying to salvage human life from the wreckage of the just-collapsed World Trade Center.

It was the afternoon of September 11, 2001, and Standley was responding to questions posed by colleagues in England. "New York very much a city still in chaos," she said. "The phones are not working properly, the subway lines are not working properly, and we know that down there near the World Trade Center there are three schoools that are being turned into triage centres for emergency treatment."

Anybody know about blasting caps or detonators that self-destruct?

The triumphant statement by a " demolition expert" on the History Channel that he saw no detonation cord, wiring or remnants of blasting caps at Ground Zero has given courage to OCT supporters.

This has come up in a long-running debate I'm running on an industry forum. The latest rejoinder I got was this

"you have not produced one blasting cap, nor one piece of wiring"

What I could find on the Web on the subject was all about detection of

A. detonators before they explode, or
B. explosives by means of chemical taggants after the blast

but nothing about detecting remnants of detonators post-blast (except that "stealth explosives" has been used as a term of ridicule for the controlled demolition argument.)

Re A, I found this: "Plastic weapons, plastic detonators, explosives enclosed into plastic cases and plastic mines are very difficult to detect."

I am beginning to suspect that the problem of detectability might actually be the other way around.

This video shows you not squibs but actual blasting charges possibly going off and
rare shots of the making of the WTC "SPIRE".

All the video has been stabilized by me for clarity. The sound has been enhanced and syncronized.

A must see.

9/11 : - NEW COLLAPSE FOOTAGE (RARE) DEMO CLEARLY SEEN - Shocking Videos

Demolition proof hidden in plain sight.

Download HD version. http://www.filefactory.com/dlf/f/8fe7e8/b/6/h/0c2cbcae529c9b62/j/9819025811

Lower Quality Streaming Webfives video

Watch and share full screen at www.webFives.com

and worse quality YOUTUBE http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ma19Vsu5PgQ

This video reveals yet more charges going off.

Sleight of hand. To support the theory of controlled demolitons at the WTC with out it being to obvious, the best thing to do would to seperate the demo sequences.

While everybody is watching the obvious, look at whats hidden in plain site.

Watch and share full screen at www.webFives.com

I had to use webfive coz' youtube is poor quality.

This video is not new, it actually has been used with fake explosion sounds to prove demolitions at the wtc.

This video is the original with no sound edits, it is stabilized, zoomed, 1/4 speed to reveal a demolition sequence 40 floors below going off diagonally reaching the service floor.

Not a conspiracy or fact?

SLIGHTY BETTER QUALITY DOWNLOAD CAN BE DOWNLOADED HERE = http://www.sendspace.com/file/deiled

A video that compares aspects of well known, 'obvious' building demolitions with the almost hidden ones of WTC 1 & 2 on September 11th 2001. I say almost because ANYONE can watch this video and see it for themselves.

See hundreds of demolition charge flashes before and during the implosions of the towers.

Watch as huge horizontal blasts eject steel and concrete far below the collapsing section.

Its clear cut folks....those towers were absolutely laced with demo charges, fact.

And that creates all sorts of horrible thoughts....

We must expose the 9/11 Inside Job...for the victims, their families, subsequent war deaths and for everyone on this planet.

Thanks to the video "9/11: The Explosive Reality" - which inspired me to put this little video together.

Gareth.

911 Mysteries – The New Version
by Nila Sagadevan

Last evening I attended the screening, in Laguna Beach, of the updated version of this excellent movie. I’m pleased to report it’s absolutely brilliant. Now completely updated, it includes clips of the BBC’s premature announcement of the demolition of WTC 7 and many other rich tidbits, as well as a superb new musical soundtrack. It’s truly a first class piece of moviemaking.

The movie was extremely well received. I helped answer questions afterwards, and can unequivocally say there wasn’t a skeptic left in the house, so compelling is its message. 90 minutes of pure demolition evidence and analysis, laced with eye-opening witness testimonials. Until something better comes along, this is the vehicle that will take the message out to our complacent mainstream.

I think I own every 9/11 movie made, so I feel I can voice an informed, albeit obviously personal, opinion: the new version of “9/11 Mysteries: Part I – Demolitions” is the best 9/11 movie out there at the moment.

And it seems I’m in good company:

"Excellent. The best of the 9/11 movies."