Over the last 8 weeks a world renowned scientist and three nationally recognized engineers have called for a new investigation of 9/11, yet none of these have been reported in the mainstream media.

Most recently, on Sept. 4, Joel S. Hirschhorn, Ph.D., who served for 12 years as a Senior Staff Member of the Congressional Office of Technology Assessment and later as Director of Environment, Energy and Natural Resources for the National Governors Association, called for a new investigation of 9/11, saying "First, let the technical truth emerge. Then, if necessary, cope with the inevitable political, conspiracy and other questions." Former Congressional Office of Technology Assessment Senior Staff Member Calls for New Investigation of 9/11

Mike Berger

Donna Marsh O'Connor

Listen 9:00 - 11:00 (CST) to the WeThePeopleRadioNetwork.com and to our guests- in the first hour- Mike Berger and in the second hour- Donna Marsh O'Connor.

Mike Berger will share his experience and insights as Media Coordinator for 911Truth.org and as a film maker. He will discuss the results of the latest Zogby Poll. He produced the excellent film-
Mike Berger was born and raised about 20 minutes from Manhattan. He earned his degree in Sociology at Washington University with a focus on human motivation.

It took nearly 18 months before he began to question the official story. When he read about the significant purchase of put options on companies directly affected by the events prior to 9/11, that implied foreknowledge of the attacks, he began to research the attacks.

I'll be handing out flyers on the morning of 9-11 and taken out an ad below in the local college student newspaper, Univ.of Nebraska--Omaha Gateway.

I am interested in knowing which sites are acting a gatekeepers on 9/11 Truth. I just finished reading an article and comments on Buzzflash: "An Appeal to 9/11 Conspiracy Buffs" from Thu, 02/22/2007 - A BUZZFLASH GUEST CONTRIBUTION by Peter Michaelson. It was a pretty lame hit piece. The bulk of the comments were from sensible people familiar with the issues. One apparent troll continually brought in absurd arguments.

I went look for article to 9/11 Truth on Buzzflash, to see if they had ever published anything. The may have published some favorable articles, but this piece by Peter Michaelson took the cake for garbage.

So, are there any authors out there who are aware of sites that refuse all pro-9/11 Truth pieces? I know about Counterpunch. Some seem to allow 9/11 Truth comments, but no articles. GNN has links to a site that attempts to debunk 9/11 research, and a site that supports it. That is odd. Perhaps someone's idea of being fair and balanced?

What have you observed? I am most concerned with sites that are influential, that have a large readership. I have the germ of an idea that this information may be useful to us.

Regards
Mike Zimmer

I'm asking for some VOTES here.

I created an ae911truth entry on Wikipedia. It has been "nominated for deletion" because it is "non-notable." I need other people to come vote to KEEP it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Architects_and_engineers_for_9/11_truth

"My column will include voices so often excluded, people whose views the media mostly ignore, issues they distort and even ridicule."— Amy Goodman from her first piece for her weekly column "Breaking the Sound Barrier"

“Of course, there will be those who demand silent obedience. We expect that from the ultra-right, and anyone with a little familiarity with history will expect it from some left intellectuals as well, perhaps in an even more virulent form. But it is important not to be intimidated by hysterical ranting and lies and to keep as closely as one can to the course of truth and honesty and concern for the human consequences of what one does, or fails to do. All truisms, but worth bearing in mind. Beyond the truisms, we turn to specific questions, for inquiry and for action.”—Noam Chomsky from the last page in his pamphlet “9-11”

Sept. 5, 2007 - U.S. Navy ‘Top Gun’ pilot, Commander Ralph Kolstad, started questioning the official account of 9/11 within days of the event. “It just didn’t make any sense to me,” he said. And now 6 years after 9/11 he says, “When one starts using his own mind, and not what one was told, there is very little to believe in the official story.”

Click here for the full story on OpEdNews http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_alan_mil_070905_u_s__navy__top_gun__.htm

On the radio show, Questioning War- Organizing Resistance, from 9:00- 11:00 pm (CST) on WeThePeopleRadioNetwork.com our guests- Paul DesLauriers and Janice Matthews will share their insights on the 9/11 Truth Movement.

Janice Matthews

Paul DesLauriers

Bearer of Light- A Catalyst for Global Change

In the First hour Paul DesLauriers will discuss his book - Bearer of Light- A Catalyst for Global Change and his experience and insights as Grassroots Coordinator for 911Truth.org.

The following is in reply to an article by David Swanson
called: Peace, Injustice and Ron Paul, posted at:
http://afterdowningstreet.org/node/26365
by Jonathan Mark

As those who have read Flyby News over the years, or have checked out our http://www.flybynews.com/cgi-local/newspro/viewnews.cgi?newsid1096139627,51253, "Campaigns for Reclaiming a Lost USA Democracy" you would be aware of my history with Dennis Kucinich, which began years before he was a 2004 presidential candidate. With goodsister, we launched one of the most active yahoogroups at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/kucinich4president/

Perhaps we have hit a nerve with these "debunker" types.

Source: http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/189230.php

August 30, 2007

A Few More Sites Flirting w/ 9-11 Twoof...

I don't know how many people outside the debunker community noticed this, but there seemed to be a recent small controlled demolition of mid-level to well known non-9-11-nutter blogs flirting with Twooferism - mostly on the left.

First, we have a profoundly idiotic post "just asking questions" making outlandish inferences and unsupported allegations at My Left Wing.

Then we have a heroically inept offering from The Dissident Voice; a self-dubbed "radical newsletter in the struggle for peace and justice."

Third, we have a gobsmackingly stupid call to action from The Muckraker Report, who apparently support all kinds of wingnuttery from both sides (think Dennis Kucinichitrons and Ron Paulbots).

The History Channel has produced a documentary titled 9/11 Conspiracies – Fact or Fiction. It aired on Monday, August 20, 2007. According to the abstract, the documentary examines the various conspiracy theories espoused on the Internet, in articles and in public forums that attempt to explain the 9/11 attacks. It includes theories that the World Trade Center was brought down by a controlled demolition; that a missile, not a commercial airliner, hit the Pentagon; and that members of the U.S. government orchestrated the attacks in hopes of creating a war in the Middle East. Each conspiracy argument is countered by a variety of experts in the fields of engineering, intelligence and the military. The program also delves into the anatomy of such conspiracies and how they grow on the Internet.

Even the abstract is a lie.

"When the solution is simple, God is answering" - Albert Einstein

Life is allegory.

Problem 1: Rubik's Cube, introduced in the early 80's - How to get the cube restored to original state of one colour on each side from any random state of disorder.

Problem 2: Realizing truth and justice regarding 911 and the encroaching New World Order - How to restore some sense of humanity and dignity to our lives in the face of a corrupt system that utilizes deceit, torture and genocide in its campaign of fear to implement a one-world globalist agenda, or non-random state-sponsored disorder.

"Truth is the agreement between knowledge and its object" - Immanuel Kant

WACS greets the illegitimate president on his way to the Bellevue Hyatt hotel. Many people from the NW including members from Portland 9/11 Truth came out to show their true feelings towards Bush.
9/11 TRUTH NOW!!!
R.I.P. Aaron Russo

In short, Never hath I seen such a biased and incomplete piece.One major flaw that should be obvious is the statement by Matthys Levy, (co-author of Why buildings Fall Down), a so-called popular mechanics expert. He states in their film,

" As the debris flew through the building at almost 500 mph it caused equivalent to sandblasting all the steel.
So all the fireproofing came off and that meant that the steel was naked, it would have been subject to the fire."

HOWEVER...

I have him, Matthys Levy, in my documentary,(http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2147329422984355159); a scene that originally aired on the discovery channel, saying the wtc's were controlled demolition. The scene is the very first scene. Please watch for exact words.

He debunks himself as being an expert !! No credibility here.