OK....

Not had much sleep, whilst verifying and double / triple checking the numbers etc... I have now narrowed down the maximum margin of error to 1 minute and can confirm that the BBC first reported WTC7's collapse at 5pm (plus or minus 60secs) New York time LIVE on 9/11, a full 20 minutes before the actual collapse happened !!!


I am working on presenting this info with a V2 of above vid and 911blogger exclusive blog, which will take some time, verification is very important and to aid this.

I please ask as many people (with high speed internet) and 5GB of spare disk space to download the following BBC originals. These are what I used to confirm the timings (you can too) and have the damning footage etc.


All times are local "New York", the ranges are pretty accurate, but following my calculations are approximately 3 mins earlier than the actual time.

Each file is MPEG format and 1GB in size - To Download - "Right Click / Save Target As"


BBC World 9/11 Footage - 14:08 to 14:49

BBC World 9/11 Footage - 14:49 to 15:31

BBC World 9/11 Footage - 15:31 to 16:13

BBC World 9/11 Footage - 16:13 to 16:54

BBC World 9/11 Footage - 16:54 to 17:36



I have produced a medium res WMV file that shows time sychronized continuous footage from 14:40 to 17:18.

This file is approx 700MB and starts at the Pataki conference with an accurate timestamp of 14:40 Eastern Time (gotta find a home for it online, DZ ?).


Maybe Guy Smith can do some research for us... LOL

Best wishes and good luck

Props to Gangster for the initial heads up on the 9/11 realtime news footage archive on archive.org.

Continuous realtime footage from 9/11 by ABC, CNN, BBC, NBC, FOX etc...

Good starting Link : http://www.archive.org/search.php?query=title%3A%28Sept.%2011%29&sort=-date

As stallion4 kindly mentioned....

More info in this blog : http://www.911blogger.com/node/6400#comment-119070

I also noticed what to me at least appears to be 2 steel columns sticking straight up through the rubble pile of WTC7 with the ends of each column "sliced at an angle" just like you would see in a Controlled Demolition.
It is at the 23:15 mark.

Just finished version 2.

More info in this blog post : http://www.911blogger.com/node/6458#comment-119458

Very tired, so I'll be brief...


New info

- Timings now within +/- 60 seconds margin of error.
- DVD Quality
- Contains info how to verify, timings etc.
- Looks a bit tidier
- Has host and reporter names





Get it here     -------> http://www.megaupload.com/?d=VL4MPLV8



Hope you all like it, if you do, please feel free to upload to Google video, youtube, liveleak etc... Share, torrent, binary newgroups.... whatever you can....


ZZZZZzzzzzzzzz.........

Great job man!!! I want to now why this isn’t on the front page yet?

Let's see where this story goes. I'd like to hear the BBC's explanation for this... This could be a big story if it is confirmed to be true, and from what I have seen it looks legitimate.

I'll help download some of this stuff for you.

“We're an empire now, and when we act we create our own reality."

http://digg.com/world_news/BBC_Reported_Building_7_Had_Collapsed_20_Minu...

That this...

Is absolutely real? If it is real, it would mean that the BBC received a press release telling them that Building 7 collapsed prior to it collapsing. It would mean that there was foreknowledge of its' collapse. It would mean that the female reporter doesn't know NYC very well. It would mean that building 7 would be the first steel structure building to come down as a result of fire, and fire alone (it was not hit by a plane). It would mean that the chances of it being brought down by Controlled Demolition are greater BECAUSE no steel structure building has ever come down due to fire, and fire alone, yet, they knew it was going to happen.

Richard Cheney - Chief Executive Of Halliburton

http://digg.com/world_news/BBC_Reported_Building_7_Had_Collapsed_20_Minu...

NEW DIGG. PLEASE DIGG IT UP!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rlFDd5Yjn3w&eurl

_______________
"We are going to keep up this fight till the end, till the very end... They took it from the top to the bottom. We're gonna take it from the bottom to the top!" -Dan Wallace

People dug through the archives and found the footage:
http://911blogger.com/node/6391

This wasn't a set-up or anything like that. If it was it backfired, because this is a huge win for the 9/11 truth movement. Millions will have learned about Building 7 thanks to the BBC story coming out.

I see no downside to this story at all.

_______________
"We are going to keep up this fight till the end, till the very end... They took it from the top to the bottom. We're gonna take it from the bottom to the top!" -Dan Wallace

The argument jabba uses is bogus. It was no incidentally pop-up, it was the work of 911veritas.

As soon as one video emerged, it is clear that others check all sources as well. Totally explainable.

So this will only serve to plant doubts- a dis-info method, at least.

I do share your hopes that this could lead to something positive for the 911 movement. I am, however, inclined to ask how and why would someone (FEMA or whoever) inform the news agencies in advance about something they would report anyway?

If BBC and CNN knew in advance versus not knowing in advance about the collapse of WTC7, how would that affect the final reporting?

The fact would still remain the same, WTC7 collapsed and it would be reported no matter what.

Whoever was in charge of 911, do you think they would run the risk of letting more people in backstage on an event of that scale? I seriously doubt that.

In any case, maybe the two feeds from BBC and CNN were digged up as a pure coincidence, maybe not. But my experience is that very few things happens by coincidence.

Putting the WTC7 in context:

Now, with three confirmations about early (means before it actually happened) reports on the collapse of WTC7, we can assume that there was indeed an early press release, stating that Building 7 has collapsed due to fires and damage from the fallen debris of the Twin Towers.

The CNN guy was confused, as he could see the building still standing in the skyline, which made him switch to “Is collapsing” as he reads the news.
The BBC reporter, who did not necessarily knew the Manhattan skyline in detail, gave us the original report: “indeed it has collapsed.”

The people behind this press release should be taken unter close scrutinity, they are most likely the real perps of that day. We can only speculate, if it was the OEM or a similar organisation or group of persons.

I mean, this early reporting was not necessarily an “error” in the script Matrix.

Remember that WTC7 slided into oblivion after that day, from 01-09-12 on?

Just think you are in the media and you discovered, that you had been duped. All the officials speak of Bin Laden and the attack, and with the state of shock, mind boggling trouble and fear…
It’s easy to assume that the media masters decided to cover this up, instead of acknowledging this hot trace and follow up. How would you had decided?

We already knew that 911 was a Psy-OP, a black OP. So this will fit perfect in context.
The media, beeing duped, would make everything they can to bury the case.
They were owned with this little trick.
Just think about that we needed nearly 6 years to worked that out.
And the ongoing attempts to bury the videos, this alone raise suspicion.

Now, let’s put that altogether:

We have: “There are bombs in the building, start clearing out”.
We have reports about countdowns.
We have ear-witnesses reports about bombs in this building.
We have a demolition expert, who said that it was controlled demolition
It looks like a controlled demolition. (neraly
The landowner admitted that they made the decision to pull it and watch it collapse.
The official report about what had happened is still missing.

There were warnings of the Twin Towers collapse ahead of time also.

If it looks like shit, if it smells like shit, if it taste like shit…

U know what I’m trying to say.

**

I sent it as Blog.

PS: Maybe, if the archiv-file was uploaded by the BBC recently (ask 911veritas), there are maybe some guys within the BBC who care about the truth...

PS: Nothing wrong about beeing careful. Sorry for my maybe too harsh words...

The main point is, there discussing and have already announced that WTC7 has collapsed... when you can clearly see it in the background - HUGE !!!!

and yes, perps to the original founder - i take no credit... but i wanted to get this info out asap.

- Drakey

???

_______________
"We are going to keep up this fight till the end, till the very end... They took it from the top to the bottom. We're gonna take it from the bottom to the top!" -Dan Wallace

Building 7 is a hologram...lol

_______________
"We are going to keep up this fight till the end, till the very end... They took it from the top to the bottom. We're gonna take it from the bottom to the top!" -Dan Wallace

Not just one time!

Pulled several times!
___________________
Ignorance is NOT Bliss

Why the hell should we defeat great evidence like this ourselves??? Promote all foreknowledge of the free-fall implosion of WTC-7!!!

please, be more high and mighty. in a previous thread Nicholas actually called anyone who took an interest in this a troll by calling the very subject TROLL BAIT in very big letters. just know the history before you get bent out of shape for people being voted down. i get voted down a lot, im sure people have their reasons. plus, like i said, Nicholas has a tendency to tell people not to look into certain avenues. im not saying things shouldnt be analyzed, but on its face this looks like it could be a big deal. the fact that it seems to have been completely scrubbed from the web as of now is pretty interesting too. im not gonna call Nicholas a troll or an antagonist for his question but understand why people may have voted him down. jumping to conclusions without info like you and calling people here twits seems fucking childish and pathetic to me. lighten up.

1) You don't need to call people names.

2) Just because you haven't been able to download and verify the video doesn't mean others haven't.

3) Nicholas' first questions are currently rated +2. It was only when he started saying things like this that he got modded down (also notice the caps):

"Here is another question you may want to avoid:

WHO PUT IN THE EXTRA TITLES WITH THE CLAIMS ABOUT THE TIME?"

4) Number 3 is somewhat irrelevant because she is saying building 7 collapsed while it is obviously standing behind her.

5) On the other hand, I agree that nailing down exact times is important. 911veritas gave an explanation of how to do that here.

6) If you haven't attempted to follow the instructions to figure out the timeline, or in your case, you haven't even watched the video, why are you posting comments such as these?

7) If you're yelling that 911veritas did not do the work to verify the times, and you haven't even done this basic research, much like a "debunker" would act, you can and should be modded down.