Recent Headlines
'Rescue Me' to feature 9/11 plot line
CIA Had Mumbai Foreknowledge
Kevin Ryan: Tales From Two Naomis
Ed Asner supports AE911Truth
Jim Fassell pledges $250k to 9/11 Charities
Dr. Bowman's Obama Letter
Did FBI get their man in Bruce Ivins?
Richard Falk: "9/11: More Than Meets The Eye"
A damning admission on the Georgian War
UPDATED: The Facts Speak For Themselves
Lawyers for 9/11 Truth
Japan: Fujita Continues to Challenge 9/11
STJ911 Misrepresented in Draft Bill
Recent Media
9/11 Debate: Jon Gold Vs. Debunker
Howard Zinn's recent comments on 9/11
Penttbom.com video footage
Richard Gage, AIA on Spanish TV
New 9/11 WTC videos posted - 10.31.2008
Peter Dale Scott & Dan Hamburg
Graeme MacQueen & Michael Keefer v. Debunkers
THE MAFIA, THE CIA AND GEORGE BUSH
Michael Wolsey interviews Richard Gage, AIA
Fabled Enemies
The Elephant in the Room
visit 911podcasts.com for more multimedia
Blogads
Asbestos Dangers

Mesothelioma is a dreaded cancer that is nearly always caused by just one factor: asbestos exposure.
FACT: Family members of those who are regularly exposed to high levels of asbestos also have a high risk of developing malignant mesothelioma.
Get the news, get the facts.
Banner Exchange
buy a DVD or book to support this site & 1st responders
User login
9/11 Related Sites
911Research.WTC7.net
9/11 Environmental Action
911review.com
911proof.com
911Truth.org
truthmove.org
911pressfortruth.com
patriotsquestion911.com
911revisited.com
william911.com
Family Steering Committee for the 9/11 Independent Commission
International Citizens' Inquiry Into 9/11
truthaction.org
911readingroom.org
9eleven.info
tyrannyalert.com
universalseed.org
deceptiondollar.com
legitgov.org
911omissionreport.com
timetowakeup.net
911tv.org
grandtheftcountry.com
Youth for 9/11 Truth
truth911.net
justacitizen.com
MartialLaw911.info
911truestory.com
911sharethetruth.com
wanttoknow.info
explosive911analysis.com
flight93crash.com
911bookshelf.com
summeroftruth.org
supportthetruth.com
mime11.com
physics911.net
911docs.net
nw0.info
investigate911.com
theultimateconspiracy.com
9/11 International Sites
911sandhed.nu
www.i11time.dk
investigar11s.org
911truth.no
911belgium.be
v911truth.org
stoplying.ca
911truth.eu
911truthpeterborough.com
luogocomune.net
911info.se
1192001.dk
11syyskuu.org
serendipity.li
eqgen.nl/aanslagen911
onderzoek911.nl
waarheid911.nl
zapruder.nl
911truthbristol.com
911truthtotnes.com
september11.se
vaken.se
911oz.com
nineeleven.co.uk
hintergrund.de
broeckers.com
thecoop.tv
operation911.de
medienanalyse-international.de
911komplott.de
deepjournal.com
truth4peace.co.uk
911truthskipton.com
wytruth.org.uk
reopen911.info
editionsdemilune.com
cremationofcare.com
Investigate 9/11
9/11 Truth Europe
911.yweb.sk
9/11 Memorial Sites
Alternative News Sites
The Real News.com
Featured Story
TV News Lies
Garlic & Grass
infowars.com
meria.net
whatreallyhappened.com
rinf.com
knowledgedrivenrevolution.com
informationclearinghouse.info
globalresearch.ca
globaloutlook.ca
The Revolutionist
mathaba.net
bushtrash.com
flybynews.com
fracturednews.com
thefairandbalancednews.com
Danny Jowenko - Dutch Demolition Expert Still Maintains WTC7 Could NOT Collapse Due to Fire

Just spotted this GEM over at Pilots For 911 Truth Forum
There have been rumours lately that Danny Jowenko (controlled demolition expert) of http://www.jowenko.nl/ had changed his mind on WTC 7.....
So Jeff of http://www.pumpitout.com/ called him and asked him
Very intersting to say the least (call lasts just over 2 minutes)
Click link below to listen or right click and save target as to download:
Don't miss this !!!
Yea I agree about their
Yea I agree about their website, the fact they they've got "Killtown’s" crap there is a big black mark.
Call to Jowenko now on Youtube (w/ Building 7 footage)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExUTAbUCYL0&eurl=http
_______________
"We are going to keep up this fight till the end, till the very end... They took it from the top to the bottom. We're gonna take it from the bottom to the top!" -Dan Wallace
Awesome. Jowenko for President!!
____
♠
Real Truther a.k.a. Verdadero Verdadero
WTCdemolition.com - Harvard Task Force
Hahaha... Nice website, cool
Hahaha... Nice website, cool audio.
Good that he managed to get Jowenko on the phone. Last time someone tried in Holland, Jowenko said he never wanted to talk about the whole thing ever again, if I remember correctly.
So this confirmation sure is a good thing.
:-)

Here's the original interview with Mr. Jowenko...
Extended version of interview w/ Controlled Demo Expert Danny Jowenko confirming that Building 7 was brought down on purpose
http://www.911blogger.com/node/3231
Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3DRhwRN06I
Part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sep-HDZoEBM
Part 3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=boNzLZInbjU
_______________
"We are going to keep up this fight till the end, till the very end... They took it from the top to the bottom. We're gonna take it from the bottom to the top!" -Dan Wallace
Are you around stallion4...
I think I have discovered something VERY significant re WTC7 (been spending the last two days going through "archive.org" footage of 9/11)...
Like the "BBC World" report that WTC7 had collapsed even before 5pm EST.
Can you spot anything wrong with this news report at 5:10pm EST.

Note : Salomon Smith Barney occupied the following floors of WTC7 - Ground, 1 to 6, 13, 18 to 46.
If you want to start downloading the Mpeg (it contains BBC world footage from 16:54 to 17:36 EST) - get it whilst you can.
Download from : http://ia311517.us.archive.org/2/items/bbc200109111654-1736/V08591-16.mpg - "right click / save target as"
Working on the report now - things like this make the research worthwhile :)
Best wishes
What on earth do you mean?
"Like the 'BBC World' report that WTC7 had collapsed even before 5pm EST."
http://ia311517.us.archive.org/2/items/bbc200109111654-1736/V08591-16.mp...
It took a lot of time to download the whole thing, and I can't see anything of what you suggest above.
I'm putting together a little movie...
Which should make it clear...
The picture above should be enough...
Read the news ticker at the bottom (remember it's 5:10pm EST) and then look to the right of her head...
They were reporting the building collapsed at 4:57pm EST.
Imagine...
The news reported JFK had just been shot, you see him alive behind the reporter as she discussed his death, then 23 minutes later he actually was shot....
If you see what I mean
Best wishes
PS.... Just incase you are unfamiliar with the Salomon Brothers Building, below is a picture.

questions
Yes, 911veritas, I'm pretty familiar with the Salomon Brothers Building:
http://11syyskuu.blogspot.com/2006/02/destruction-of-wtc-7.html
(that's my page) :-)
And while looking at the picture and watching the video, I *was* thinking "that building to the right of her looks just like WTC 7". But then I thought it couldn't be, or that the footage shown on the background was not real-time.
But *how* do you know it's 5:10 when she is talking, or that they were reporting the building collapse at 4:57? I didn't get that?
All I can say is they are so BUSTED !!!!
The timings of the sections, listed on archive.org are pretty accurate, but I want to remove as much margin of error as possible !!!
To calculate / confirm the actual time of the footage, was simply referencing live sections that referred to the time...
I.e. George Pataki's Speech (with a big clock in the background) that displays 2:38pm.
This is corroborated by other live sections where presenters said it is now "3:30pm" in New York and "4pm" in New York, calculating the times is easy because all the footage is continuous and chronological with no breaks or missing footage.
I have done some maths and the worst margin of error could be 6 minutes at most.
So even with the maximum error possible, the first televised official report that WTC7 was down was at 5:03pm EST...
17 minutes before the building actually came down.
Still to me the most damning evidence is the lady reporter "Jane Standley" who is obviously not in front of an artificial background, the sun is clearly shining on her and when she puts her hand out the window, you can clearly see the sun on her hand. They have also been filming out that window all day.
She talks for a full seven minutes about WTC7 having collapsed whilst you can still see it over her left shoulder....
Two possibilites
Either someone deliberately issued a press tip-off / release early as to bust the perps story wide open (sorry we took so long).
or
The press statement detailing WTC7's demise was issued but the perps had problems for twenty or so minutes getting the demolition job done.
I am working on reducing the margin of error to less than sixty seconds... and will get back when done.
Best wishes.
This is SO BIG
Nice find!
I agree with your analysis too.
Waiting eagerly for your final presentation about this, 911veritas.
_______________
"We are going to keep up this fight till the end, till the very end... They took it from the top to the bottom. We're gonna take it from the bottom to the top!" -Dan Wallace
make sure you blog it, i
make sure you blog it, i look forward to it.
Someone DID blog it earlier today, but it's since disappeared
Not sure why, though. Hopefully it's just undergoing an updating process? But there were several comments on it including 911veritas' latest research regarding this story. There was also a video about it posted on the blog that disappeared, that was produced by (I think) 911veritas. Here it is:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1471985581749234824&q
A graphic has also been created to go along with this story by (I think) PUMPITOUT.com:

_______________
"We are going to keep up this fight till the end, till the very end... They took it from the top to the bottom. We're gonna take it from the bottom to the top!" -Dan Wallace
Yes, 911blogger took it down - maybe because it's TROLL BAIT!
Nicholas what are you talking about?
Building 7 can clearly be seen still standing behind the reporter:
_______________
"We are going to keep up this fight till the end, till the very end... They took it from the top to the bottom. We're gonna take it from the bottom to the top!" -Dan Wallace
Respectfully...
STFU...
Troll bait, disinfo... I can smell your worried and desperate BS from here....
I would bet my last dollar on the BBC reporting WTC7 down at 5pm (local time New York on 9/11) YES that's 20 minutes before it actually came down...
This will be FULLY verified, proved without doubt (you can do it yourself, with the information on the blog, when it eventually gets authorized) and I hope you eat your post with beans on...
Better still, order the BBC World footage from 14:40 to 17:19 Eastern time... yes local to New York on 9/11 (that's 19:40 to 22:19 UK time).
sheeesh, you disinfo troll
always right on time huh
always right on time huh Nick?
I agree this is big. This
I agree this is big.
This should be used as a lever to force WTC 7 to the a lot of people. There already were so many things about it... and now this!
My colleague said they'll probably just try to explain this as some kind of confusion... They feared it was going to collapse, something got mixed up, etc.
Great post 911Veritas
History was made with this post! Just had to come back to acknowledge that!
This is good to hear.
This is good to hear. Thanks.
Anyone have a high-quality
Anyone have a high-quality version of the above-vids? And while I'm making requests -- anyone have a high-res video of David Ray Griffin's speech in NY before the anniversary? Or Ralph Shoenman's? Thanks.
re Jowenko vid
Hi Danse. Try contacting the person who posted the footage on youtube:
http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=einsteen
His moniker is "einsteen". He also posts at LCF, so you may want to try to get a hold of him there if you're registered:
http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showuser=793
Thanks. Will do. The
Thanks. Will do.
The uncut interview was put
No one is "cherry picking"
When Danny Jowenko was first interviewed about the towers and their "collapses" for the first time, Mr. Jowenko -- not being familiar with unconventional "Top Down" controlled demolition method, and not having studied information supporting WTC controlled demolition theories in depth -- stated that he did not think the twin towers were brought down by explosives.
However, after examining WTC-7 information for the first time later on during the same interview, he explained that the building was in fact a conventional "bottom up" demolition, based on his personal experience in performing conventional "bottom up" demolitions for 20+ years.
Months after the interview (after he researched Building 7 in much greater detail than he had during his original interview for the Dutch TV documentary about 9/11), Mr. Jowenko is still convinced that explosives brought down Building 7. His current opinions and research about whether or not the towers were brought down with explosives is unknown at this time.
Many "skeptics" argue that Mr. Jowenko is only 1 of thousands in the demolition industry who believe WTC-7 was a controlled demolition. This is a false and disingenuous claim, because the number of people experienced in demolition (or Structural design) who actually believe in the WTC controlled demolition theory, or how many have actually studied it is unknown. Most have never gone on public record to say what they believe happened to the WTC buildings on 9/11.
Also, "top down" controlled demolition is possible to accomplish, but not a practical method of controlled demolition, That's the reason why demolition experts such as Danny Jowenko aren't familiar with "top down" demo. They simply don't use that method, because it's not practical.
The only reason why the towers were brought down using a "top down" demolition method was to give the illusion that the planes brought the towers down -period. If they would have been demolished conventionally -- bottom up -- it would have been much too obvious that the planes did not bring the towers down.
Anyway, when and if Mr. Jowenko says that he now believes the towers were also brought down by explosives, the "skeptics" will just call him a "kook". Hell, they're already calling him a "kook" because he believes WTC-7 was brought down from explosives. Will you call Mr. Jowenko a "kook" too, monkeyman, if he comes out and says the towers were controlled demolition?
_______________
"We are going to keep up this fight till the end, till the very end... They took it from the top to the bottom. We're gonna take it from the bottom to the top!" -Dan Wallace
In fact Jowenko spends some
hurl abuse?
Where did I "hurl abuse" at monkeyman?
And at this time it's unknown what Mr. Jowenko believes regarding the towers. It's a fact that he hadn't researched the issue of WTC controlled demolition before he was interviewed several months ago for the Dutch TV documentary. He's now had several months to research CD theory. I'm sure he's discovered what other researchers have discovered, i.e., witnesses who reported finding bombs in the buildings, heard explosions and felt the ground shaking seconds before the towers fell, saw orange and red flashes at the base of the towers shooting up and all around seconds before the towers fell, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera..
misterguy, the only abuse that's being hurled at someone on this thread is coming from you. Not me.
_______________
"We are going to keep up this fight till the end, till the very end... They took it from the top to the bottom. We're gonna take it from the bottom to the top!" -Dan Wallace











Good stuff! I gotta say the
Good stuff!
I gotta say the stuff on the front page of pumpitout.com is a bit odd though. Maybe not the best thing to have on the front page of this site ("proof that 1+1 = 2")? I'm sure that makes sense to them, but it makes no sense to me.