Danny Jowenko - Dutch Demolition Expert Still Maintains WTC7 Could NOT Collapse Due to Fire

Blogads

Banner Exchange

Danny Jowenko - Dutch Demolition Expert Still Maintains WTC7 Could NOT Collapse Due to Fire

Entries in this section are created by individual users who register with this site and are largely unmoderated. Content in this section should not be interpreted as being supported by 911blogger.com, or by any other members of this site, and should only be viewed as a posting of the individual who created it. Please contact a team member if you notice a post which violates our general rules.

Submitted by 911veritas on Thu, 02/22/2007 - 5:03pm.

Just spotted this GEM over at Pilots For 911 Truth Forum

There have been rumours lately that Danny Jowenko (controlled demolition expert) of http://www.jowenko.nl/ had changed his mind on WTC 7.....

So Jeff of http://www.pumpitout.com/ called him and asked him

Very intersting to say the least (call lasts just over 2 minutes)

Click link below to listen or right click and save target as to download:

Phone call to Danny Jowenko

Don't miss this !!!

» 911veritas's blog | login to post comments | printer friendly version

» login to post comments | 2 points

Good stuff! I gotta say the

Good stuff!

I gotta say the stuff on the front page of pumpitout.com is a bit odd though. Maybe not the best thing to have on the front page of this site ("proof that 1+1 = 2")? I'm sure that makes sense to them, but it makes no sense to me.

Submitted by FalseDichotomy on Thu, 02/22/2007 - 5:28pm.

» login to post comments | 2 points

Yea I agree about their

Yea I agree about their website, the fact they they've got "Killtown’s" crap there is a big black mark.

Submitted by Dem Bruce Lee Styles on Fri, 02/23/2007 - 11:16am.

» login to post comments | 1 point

Call to Jowenko now on Youtube (w/ Building 7 footage)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExUTAbUCYL0&eurl=http

_______________
"We are going to keep up this fight till the end, till the very end... They took it from the top to the bottom. We're gonna take it from the bottom to the top!" -Dan Wallace

Submitted by stallion4 on Sun, 02/25/2007 - 10:38pm.

» login to post comments | 1 point

Awesome. Jowenko for President!!

____

♠

Real Truther a.k.a. Verdadero Verdadero

WTCdemolition.com - Harvard Task Force

Submitted by Real Truther on Sun, 02/25/2007 - 11:38pm.

» login to post comments | 3 points

Hahaha... Nice website, cool

Hahaha... Nice website, cool audio.
Good that he managed to get Jowenko on the phone. Last time someone tried in Holland, Jowenko said he never wanted to talk about the whole thing ever again, if I remember correctly.
So this confirmation sure is a good thing.

Submitted by VAB on Thu, 02/22/2007 - 6:07pm.

» login to post comments | 4 points

:-)

Here's the original interview with Mr. Jowenko...

Extended version of interview w/ Controlled Demo Expert Danny Jowenko confirming that Building 7 was brought down on purpose
http://www.911blogger.com/node/3231

Part 1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3DRhwRN06I

Part 2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sep-HDZoEBM

Part 3

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=boNzLZInbjU

_______________
"We are going to keep up this fight till the end, till the very end... They took it from the top to the bottom. We're gonna take it from the bottom to the top!" -Dan Wallace

Submitted by stallion4 on Thu, 02/22/2007 - 8:05pm.

» login to post comments | 3 points

Are you around stallion4...

I think I have discovered something VERY significant re WTC7 (been spending the last two days going through "archive.org" footage of 9/11)...

Like the "BBC World" report that WTC7 had collapsed even before 5pm EST.

Can you spot anything wrong with this news report at 5:10pm EST.

Note : Salomon Smith Barney occupied the following floors of WTC7 - Ground, 1 to 6, 13, 18 to 46.

If you want to start downloading the Mpeg (it contains BBC world footage from 16:54 to 17:36 EST) - get it whilst you can.

Download from : http://ia311517.us.archive.org/2/items/bbc200109111654-1736/V08591-16.mpg - "right click / save target as"

Working on the report now - things like this make the research worthwhile :)

Best wishes

Submitted by 911veritas on Sat, 02/24/2007 - 2:15pm.

» login to post comments | 0 points

What on earth do you mean?

"Like the 'BBC World' report that WTC7 had collapsed even before 5pm EST."

http://ia311517.us.archive.org/2/items/bbc200109111654-1736/V08591-16.mp...

It took a lot of time to download the whole thing, and I can't see anything of what you suggest above.

Submitted by Vesa on Sat, 02/24/2007 - 10:05pm.

» login to post comments | 1 point

I'm putting together a little movie...

Which should make it clear...

The picture above should be enough...

Read the news ticker at the bottom (remember it's 5:10pm EST) and then look to the right of her head...

They were reporting the building collapsed at 4:57pm EST.

Imagine...

The news reported JFK had just been shot, you see him alive behind the reporter as she discussed his death, then 23 minutes later he actually was shot....

If you see what I mean

Best wishes

PS.... Just incase you are unfamiliar with the Salomon Brothers Building, below is a picture.

Submitted by 911veritas on Sun, 02/25/2007 - 12:19am.

» login to post comments | 0 points

questions

Yes, 911veritas, I'm pretty familiar with the Salomon Brothers Building:

http://11syyskuu.blogspot.com/2006/02/destruction-of-wtc-7.html

(that's my page) :-)

And while looking at the picture and watching the video, I *was* thinking "that building to the right of her looks just like WTC 7". But then I thought it couldn't be, or that the footage shown on the background was not real-time.

But *how* do you know it's 5:10 when she is talking, or that they were reporting the building collapse at 4:57? I didn't get that?

Submitted by Vesa on Sun, 02/25/2007 - 5:31am.

» login to post comments | 5 points

All I can say is they are so BUSTED !!!!

The timings of the sections, listed on archive.org are pretty accurate, but I want to remove as much margin of error as possible !!!

To calculate / confirm the actual time of the footage, was simply referencing live sections that referred to the time...

I.e. George Pataki's Speech (with a big clock in the background) that displays 2:38pm.

This is corroborated by other live sections where presenters said it is now "3:30pm" in New York and "4pm" in New York, calculating the times is easy because all the footage is continuous and chronological with no breaks or missing footage.

I have done some maths and the worst margin of error could be 6 minutes at most.

So even with the maximum error possible, the first televised official report that WTC7 was down was at 5:03pm EST...

17 minutes before the building actually came down.

Still to me the most damning evidence is the lady reporter "Jane Standley" who is obviously not in front of an artificial background, the sun is clearly shining on her and when she puts her hand out the window, you can clearly see the sun on her hand. They have also been filming out that window all day.

She talks for a full seven minutes about WTC7 having collapsed whilst you can still see it over her left shoulder....

Two possibilites

Either someone deliberately issued a press tip-off / release early as to bust the perps story wide open (sorry we took so long).

The press statement detailing WTC7's demise was issued but the perps had problems for twenty or so minutes getting the demolition job done.

I am working on reducing the margin of error to less than sixty seconds... and will get back when done.

Best wishes.

This is SO BIG

Submitted by 911veritas on Sun, 02/25/2007 - 12:24pm.

» login to post comments | 4 points

Nice find!

I agree with your analysis too.
Waiting eagerly for your final presentation about this, 911veritas.

_______________
"We are going to keep up this fight till the end, till the very end... They took it from the top to the bottom. We're gonna take it from the bottom to the top!" -Dan Wallace

Submitted by stallion4 on Sun, 02/25/2007 - 9:13pm.

» login to post comments | 2 points

make sure you blog it, i

make sure you blog it, i look forward to it.

Submitted by Chris on Mon, 02/26/2007 - 10:05am.

» login to post comments | 4 points

Someone DID blog it earlier today, but it's since disappeared

Not sure why, though. Hopefully it's just undergoing an updating process? But there were several comments on it including 911veritas' latest research regarding this story. There was also a video about it posted on the blog that disappeared, that was produced by (I think) 911veritas. Here it is:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1471985581749234824&q

A graphic has also been created to go along with this story by (I think) PUMPITOUT.com:

_______________
"We are going to keep up this fight till the end, till the very end... They took it from the top to the bottom. We're gonna take it from the bottom to the top!" -Dan Wallace

Submitted by stallion4 on Mon, 02/26/2007 - 1:09pm.

» login to post comments | -7 points

Yes, 911blogger took it down - maybe because it's TROLL BAIT!

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]

Submitted by Nicholas on Mon, 02/26/2007 - 2:03pm.

» login to post comments | 5 points

Nicholas what are you talking about?

Building 7 can clearly be seen still standing behind the reporter:

_______________
"We are going to keep up this fight till the end, till the very end... They took it from the top to the bottom. We're gonna take it from the bottom to the top!" -Dan Wallace

Submitted by stallion4 on Mon, 02/26/2007 - 2:14pm.

» login to post comments | 5 points

Respectfully...

STFU...

Troll bait, disinfo... I can smell your worried and desperate BS from here....

I would bet my last dollar on the BBC reporting WTC7 down at 5pm (local time New York on 9/11) YES that's 20 minutes before it actually came down...

This will be FULLY verified, proved without doubt (you can do it yourself, with the information on the blog, when it eventually gets authorized) and I hope you eat your post with beans on...

Better still, order the BBC World footage from 14:40 to 17:19 Eastern time... yes local to New York on 9/11 (that's 19:40 to 22:19 UK time).

sheeesh, you disinfo troll

Submitted by 911veritas on Mon, 02/26/2007 - 2:15pm.

» login to post comments | 4 points

always right on time huh

always right on time huh Nick?

Submitted by Chris on Mon, 02/26/2007 - 4:18pm.

» login to post comments | 4 points

I agree this is big. This

I agree this is big.

This should be used as a lever to force WTC 7 to the a lot of people. There already were so many things about it... and now this!

My colleague said they'll probably just try to explain this as some kind of confusion... They feared it was going to collapse, something got mixed up, etc.

Submitted by Vesa on Mon, 02/26/2007 - 12:49pm.

» login to post comments | 3 points

Ummmm

????????

I'm speechless right now

Good thing a picture is worth $7 billion words
___________________
Ignorance is NOT Bliss

Submitted by JJJames on Mon, 02/26/2007 - 12:37am.

» login to post comments | 2 points

Great post 911Veritas

History was made with this post! Just had to come back to acknowledge that!

Submitted by Chris Rose on Thu, 03/01/2007 - 6:42am.

» login to post comments | 3 points

This is good to hear.

This is good to hear. Thanks.

Submitted by misterguy on Thu, 02/22/2007 - 10:57pm.

» login to post comments | 0 points

Anyone have a high-quality

Anyone have a high-quality version of the above-vids? And while I'm making requests -- anyone have a high-res video of David Ray Griffin's speech in NY before the anniversary? Or Ralph Shoenman's? Thanks.

The Eleventh Day of Every Month

Submitted by Danse on Fri, 02/23/2007 - 12:59am.

» login to post comments | 1 point

re Jowenko vid

Hi Danse. Try contacting the person who posted the footage on youtube:

http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=einsteen

His moniker is "einsteen". He also posts at LCF, so you may want to try to get a hold of him there if you're registered:

http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showuser=793

Submitted by stallion4 on Fri, 02/23/2007 - 1:22am.

» login to post comments | 2 points

Thanks. Will do. The

Thanks. Will do.

The Eleventh Day of Every Month

Submitted by Danse on Fri, 02/23/2007 - 5:48am.

» login to post comments | -3 points

The uncut interview was put

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]

Submitted by monkeyman on Fri, 02/23/2007 - 9:28am.

» login to post comments | 6 points

No one is "cherry picking"

When Danny Jowenko was first interviewed about the towers and their "collapses" for the first time, Mr. Jowenko -- not being familiar with unconventional "Top Down" controlled demolition method, and not having studied information supporting WTC controlled demolition theories in depth -- stated that he did not think the twin towers were brought down by explosives.

However, after examining WTC-7 information for the first time later on during the same interview, he explained that the building was in fact a conventional "bottom up" demolition, based on his personal experience in performing conventional "bottom up" demolitions for 20+ years.

Months after the interview (after he researched Building 7 in much greater detail than he had during his original interview for the Dutch TV documentary about 9/11), Mr. Jowenko is still convinced that explosives brought down Building 7. His current opinions and research about whether or not the towers were brought down with explosives is unknown at this time.

Many "skeptics" argue that Mr. Jowenko is only 1 of thousands in the demolition industry who believe WTC-7 was a controlled demolition. This is a false and disingenuous claim, because the number of people experienced in demolition (or Structural design) who actually believe in the WTC controlled demolition theory, or how many have actually studied it is unknown. Most have never gone on public record to say what they believe happened to the WTC buildings on 9/11.

Also, "top down" controlled demolition is possible to accomplish, but not a practical method of controlled demolition, That's the reason why demolition experts such as Danny Jowenko aren't familiar with "top down" demo. They simply don't use that method, because it's not practical.

The only reason why the towers were brought down using a "top down" demolition method was to give the illusion that the planes brought the towers down -period. If they would have been demolished conventionally -- bottom up -- it would have been much too obvious that the planes did not bring the towers down.

Anyway, when and if Mr. Jowenko says that he now believes the towers were also brought down by explosives, the "skeptics" will just call him a "kook". Hell, they're already calling him a "kook" because he believes WTC-7 was brought down from explosives. Will you call Mr. Jowenko a "kook" too, monkeyman, if he comes out and says the towers were controlled demolition?

_______________
"We are going to keep up this fight till the end, till the very end... They took it from the top to the bottom. We're gonna take it from the bottom to the top!" -Dan Wallace

Submitted by stallion4 on Fri, 02/23/2007 - 6:58pm.

» login to post comments | -5 points

In fact Jowenko spends some

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]

Submitted by misterguy on Fri, 02/23/2007 - 7:28pm.

» login to post comments | 4 points

hurl abuse?

Where did I "hurl abuse" at monkeyman?

And at this time it's unknown what Mr. Jowenko believes regarding the towers. It's a fact that he hadn't researched the issue of WTC controlled demolition before he was interviewed several months ago for the Dutch TV documentary. He's now had several months to research CD theory. I'm sure he's discovered what other researchers have discovered, i.e., witnesses who reported finding bombs in the buildings, heard explosions and felt the ground shaking seconds before the towers fell, saw orange and red flashes at the base of the towers shooting up and all around seconds before the towers fell, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera..

misterguy, the only abuse that's being hurled at someone on this thread is coming from you. Not me.

_______________
"We are going to keep up this fight till the end, till the very end... They took it from the top to the bottom. We're gonna take it from the bottom to the top!" -Dan Wallace

Submitted by stallion4 on Fri, 02/23/2007 - 7:54pm.

» login to post comments | -3 points

Oh. I see. Turn about is

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]

Submitted by misterguy on Sat, 02/24/2007 - 12:08am.

Recent Headlines

Recent Media

Action Items

Blogads

Banner Exchange

User login

9/11 Inquiry Sites

9/11 Regional Sites

9/11 Related Sites

9/11 International Sites

9/11 Memorial Sites

News and Blogs

RSS Feeds

Web Stuff

Danny Jowenko - Dutch Demolition Expert Still Maintains WTC7 Could NOT Collapse Due to Fire