Actor James Brolin and Director David Lynch Go Public With 9/11 Questions
Please check out the two newest articles at www.prisonplanet.com and www.infowars.com
Actor James Brolin Latest Celebrity To Publicly Doubt 9/11
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Wednesday, December 6, 2006
Actor James Brolin, the husband of Barbara Streisand, has today become the latest celebrity figure to publicly question the official story behind 9/11, after he encouraged viewers of a top rated ABC talk show to check out a 9/11 truth website.
Brolin appeared as a guest on The View Wednesday morning and according to e mails we have been receiving in numbers, towards the end of the show the actor questioned 9/11 and urged the audience to check out the website 911weknow.com, which is a website that purports to expose how the twin towers and Building 7, which wasn't hit by a plane, were brought down via controlled demolition.
Continued...
http://prisonplanet.com/articles/december2006/061206actorbrolin.htm
Update: Video now available
Director David Lynch Goes Public With 9/11 Questions
Aaron Dykes / Jones Report | December 6, 2006
Legendary film director David Lynch , who created the "Twin Peaks" TV series and has made such unique and thoughtful films as Blue Velvet , Eraserhead and Mulholland Dr. , has spoken out about 9/11 questions on a Dutch TV program, "Wereldgasten" on VPRO.
Lynch brings up that the hole at the Pentagon is not big enough for a plane, while there is little or no damage to the lawn. Furthermore, he points out that released videos do not show a plane hitting the Pentagon.
He goes on to briefly highlight the questions regarding the three unexplained demolition-style collapses of the World Trade Center Buildings.
"And two of them were hit by a plane, but the third one, they said 'you want us to pull it' and they pulled it, and it looked just like the other two. Those things bother me." Lynch said.
He is also bothered by the hole in the ground in Pennsylvania.
"So every place, there's questions. You don't have to believe everything in the documentary to still have questions"
Continued...
http://infowars.com/articles/sept11/video_lynch_speaks_about_911.htm
Video here: http://www.youtube.com/v/vyVTkf8TnHc
- justanidea's blog
- Login to post comments
dudes, you have waaaaay too
dudes, you have waaaaay too many under-employed Mexicans who could really make a quantum difference if they were exploited to do, (not gang) grafitti,"
LOL. Tommy Boy, get laid. You're a filthy lil' racist and you know it.
digg it:
http://www.digg.com/videos_educational/911_The_Greatest_Lie_Evers_Sold_B...
digg it:
http://www.digg.com/videos_educational/911_The_Greatest_Lie_Evers_Sold_B...
insane!!!
Any "conspiracy theory" that was whacko and nutty like the government apologists say 9/11 Truth is, would be LOSING steam and not gaining steam as it goes on.
Why would successful Hollywood folk bring this up? Do you know how bad this would hurt their image if it was just a "kooky theory"? Why would MORE and MORE famous folk be putting their careers on the line?
Why wouldn't Bush and company WANT to get rid of these thoughts we are harboring and prove their innocence? Surely they've seen the poll numbers lately. If I was in the administration and even a small number of people were accusing me of such terrible crimes, I would be first on the podium to answer ALL questions and yell from the mountain top that I had nothing to do with this.
Look, I don't think the president has to acknowledge every kooky little theory that anyone holds, but once 30%+ start doubting their story, we deserve the right to question them.
Just more proof of their guilt.
This is insane people!!!!
Digg it...
David Lynch Questions Official 9/11 Conspiracy Theory
http://www.digg.com/political_opinion/David_Lynch_Questions_Official_9_1...
And this one too please:
Hollywood stars using their fame to attract attention to 9/11 truth
http://digg.com/political_opinion/Hollywood_stars_using_their_fame_to_at...
Free digg.com membership:
http://digg.com/register
Dugg Both of them
I hope it makes it!
Buried..
A Bunch of assholes buried the first story
Weak
oh well, we tried. The David Lynch story reached #2 for most popular "Upcoming Stories in World & Business". Thanks to all who dugg it.
I congratulate both Brolin & Lynch for coming forward with
9/11 truth! Great work guys! Hopefully more famous people now will follow in your brave footsteps!
Michael Moore.
Why is Michael Moore being such a PUSSY when it comes to confronting the issues of 9/11 and Robert Gates' association with Al Qaeda and Bin Laden. I don't get it. He seems like he'd stand up to anything. What do you think is the fuck wrong with him on these issues???
Bill Maher too.
Bill Maher is a PUSSY too when it comes to Nine Eleven!!!
Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert
These guys are pussies too. I mean they could at least have David Ray Griffin on to interview him about his ideas. Everyone is guilty of being weak and they should all be called out on it as well.
Jon Stewart is the pussy of pussies
I don't even watch the Daily Show anymore. Since he had on Thomas Kean, the HEAD OF THE FUCKIN 9/11 COMMISSION, I haven't watched because of how disgusted I am with Stewart. I've never seen Jon Stewart question someone so gently and timidly as he did with Kean. I was astonished. I don't want to come out and say that Jon Stewart is an intentional gatekeeper, but he's definitely not about to join us in any public way. Nor will Colbert.
Before you all get carried
Before you all get carried away with pussies, let's recognize that for most television personalities there is simply no incentive to opine on such a controversial subject. And dumping on Colbert and Stewart is pointless: they are court jesters, not revolutionaries. Revolution has never been their role, and it never will be. They exist to make comedy out of monstrosity. Some think this is subversive; others think they put a human face on sociopathic elites.
The pressure should remain on the people whose jobs are supposed to be defined by protecting liberty and democracy: politicians, judges, and academics.
Jesters? That's right.
When the 911 hoax is exposed. They will look exactly like the court jesters they are.
no incentive??
Well, let's see--are they HUMAN? Do they believe in murdering and lying about it? Morality is a great incentive--maybe they lack it? They are not jesters--jesters TELL the hard truth, that's the whole point. These are just people who are making careers out of not mentioning 9/11 and getting liberals to tune in and not hear 9/11 discussed. Sorry, they had 5 years. I'll give them another 5 days at most to come out with it. OF COURSE once most poeple know they will pretend to discover the truth and no doubt try to convince people of their own sanitized version.
____
Real Truther a.k.a. Verdadero Verdadero
WTCdemolition.com - Harvard Task Force
I do remember Colbert
I do remember Colbert grilling William Kristol on the PNAC document. I don't quite remember what exactly he said, but I was quite impressed that he would bring that up. I don't really know what that means, but I hold out some hope for Stewart and Colbert.
"True enlightenment is attained when one can, at will, see through the illusion of reality." - Me, intoxicated
That is a BIG question about Moore
Many people are wondering the same thing as you.
The prison planet article
The prison planet article says today's airing of The View may have been pre-empted by the Iraq Study Group announcement. How convenient. They tape these things in advance, so the people at ABC knew what would be said on today's show ahead of time. This pre-emption just seems a bit too convenient for the PTB.
911 "No-Planes" Conspirators Seek To Sabotage Truth!
It's now entirely obvious -- no-planes is false-opposition truth sabotage!
http://www.rense.com/general74/911s.htm
TV Fakery video clip
I don't know why this subject is in the middle of what appears to be a totally unrelated thread. I never looked in to the "no plane" theory" because I was under the impression many witnesses heard and saw what appeared to be "planes" and that plane parts were found on the street.
But I have to say the right frame at that TV Fakery link just looked like the plane melted into the building with zero resistance and zero evidence of external break-up of the plane or the building. Kind of like a mirage.
I always thought the plane they show in many of the 9-11 videos, the one going in to the south tower I think, looked kind of fakey. The plane just happened to be flying at just the angle where the full clear outline of "a plane" was clearly discernable. Seems a metal shiny plane on a sun shiney day would not show that perfect of a plane outline all the way in to the building.
Morgan Reynolds briefly mentioned his no plane position yesterday on The Dynamic Due and Dr. Fetzer just said he found reason to disagree but that he wanted to hear Dr. Reynolds ideas. The no plane idea though was not at all discussed on the show by Dr. Reynolds.
I just think the Scholars for 9-11 truth have gone about as fer as they can go. Their work on establishing the falsity of the official story and laying out all the unanswered questions has been very great, and that work is complete.
If we intend to go to court with something, it will have to be now with what has been established.
It is interesting and important from a true science standpoint to consider and discuss ALL ideas about what did happen, but we will never be able to scientifically know what did happen.
That is why there is a lull now in the 9-11 truth movement. We can go no further as to establshing an hypothesis that fits all of the relevant avalable evidence.
Dr. Fetzer did say, sort of in agreement with Dr. Morgan Reynolds, that Thermate alone could not explain the degree of pulverization and lack of rubble. The Twin Towers were literally blown to kinddom come. They were vaporized. Cars parked on the streets up to one and one half miles away, and some with humans in them, were warped and partically melted and the people inside of them were "disappeared". That is evidence that needs to be explained, and sorry for the pun, but thermate just won't cut it in explaining that.
Blessings from Dachsie in Austin.
There is no "lull" in the truth movement
For starters, you might want to check the headline of this thread. Oh, that's right - you say further down that it's "much ado about nothing". Forgive me if I think you sound more like a doomshill than someone actually concerned about expanding and amplifying the movement - but you do! Whoever you are, Daschle, I can tell you for a FACT that more and more and more people are waking up EVERY DAY and more and more people are getting ACTIVE every day. We are a force of nature and we won't be stopped... you might not hear that chirpily reported on FOX and Friends but don't be fooled!
it's always been obvious to
it's always been obvious to me since I heard the story from webfairy or should I say webfairytale.
YouTube of Brolin on TheView
We need to get the YouTube clip of Brolin saying this on the view. I'm sure it must be out there somewhere. I'd love to pass that mainstream clip around a little bit. :)
While Michael Moore, Bill
While Michael Moore, Bill Mahr, Colbert and Stewart may not be speaking out yet... It is brave individuals like Brolin and Lynch and of course Charlie Sheen that have and will open up the floodgates.
I say we focus on the positivity of todays revelations, rather then filling the comments here with name calling about those who did'nt just lend a big helping hand to the truth.
I mean, this is good news! Is it not?
just an idea...
Maybe someone with TIVO on
Maybe someone with TIVO on the West Coast will step up. Lets hope!
Good Point.
you're right justanidea. thanks.
I also got James Brolin's news and Robert Gates' issues up at the top of www.CrooksandLiars.com 's open thread for tonight (12/6/06) and I am happy as hell about that. Hopefully a lot of people will read the links I provided and do a little research and passing around of this information as well. Anyway. I'm glad you called me on my pessimism and helped me to realize we have to stay hopeful and positive. It's a tough balance, but we might as well have fun as we fight like hell to get this country back and the truth out. Peace.
Hopefully Moore, Colbert, Stewart et al will come around soon :)
so striesand's squeeze
so striesand's squeeze doubts the official story...so what...what basis in education, background or credibility does he have?
Anyone that jumps on his coat-tails is basically admitting that they always believe the most ridiculous explanation invented.
awesome!
this is great news! i hope we get footage of it!
i wonder what rosie said about it---wonder what the
"reporter" walters thought!
hmm..... time to step up people!!!!!!!
I would hardly call the
I would hardly call the mentioning of www.911weknow.com (and therefore 911 Mysteries) on National Syndicated Television to a whole new audience of people "much ado about nothing".
The issue is not about being washed up or not. Can you tell me the last person that went on "The View" and said anything about 911 Truth?
I wish it did not take a "Celebrity" to wake some people up, but it does help. There are people who wont start to question until they see it becoming "ok" or "mainstream" to do so. As unfortunate as that is, I don't think attacking Alex Jones is going to solve anything.
I don't care if the Easter Bunny made Brolin go public, I only care that he did.
Exactly.
Exactly. We happen to live in a celebrity obsessed society. Whether or not that is good or bad, we need to make that work for our advantage. Any "celebrity" that speaks out should be applauded and recognized by us. That's just the way it is in 2006.
AJ
So if Alex was trying to somehow capitalize off famous people coming out about 9/11, why doesn't he mention the names of actors who have come to him and said they know about the inside job, but haven't come out publicly?
Why do so many people try to bring Alex down? He's one of our most informed, hardest working soldiers right now. Sure, he gets upset and angry and sounds like a flawed person (as we all are) at times, but he has been doing this for most of his life and is an extremely smart guy.
I'm not saying he's perfect...but why dog him? I listen to his show everyday (among others) and there is no way he's naming those people just to boost his name up.
Even if he was, GOOD! I want Alex Jones' name to be EVERYWHERE. It deserves to be!!
Alex Jones is doing a splendid job
You don't reveal your sources if they haven't agreed on it.
Alex Jones is doing a splendid job. You can always tell cointell and/or misinformed people on the fact that they spread hate and lies about him. I wonder if envy is a factor too!?
He has his style/personality flaws (don't we all), but that's just because he is a real genuine person. I have no problem with that. I think he's a good,fair radio host too and his show is professional and he doesn't sound like an amateur.Always something interesting on his show.I'm never bored.He makes great documentaries too.
www.infowars.com www.prisonplanet.com
And to you who don't like him: Let the hating begin and see if I care to waste time on you!
Brolin may be washup.... BUT
James Brolin may be "washed up" as a celebrity but he is still married to one of the most famous people on the planet. Don't think for one moment that he didn't consult Barbra before making his views public. What he says would obviously reflect on her also so I'm guessing she knew full well that he was going to do this. Now if Ms. Streisand came out and publicly agreed with her husband we'd be on to something. When Barbra talks people still listen. Good on you James keep it up.
Respect
There are very few Hollywood types that hae major pull in Hollywood or anywhere else.... but Brolin is one of the more respected and informed. And being respected has very little to do with being a successful actor..... last time I checked.
Who would you consider the most respected Hollywood actor as far as issues of political or world knowledge?
He's also married to Barbra Streisand... that coupled with going on "The View" is going to open the eyes of a demographic of people which has been, in my opinion, very difficult for the "Truth" Movement to break into..... Women in general unfortunately do not normally concern themselves with issues that are on this level. It is very deep and very involved to get to know the info intimately.... and it's really not something that they would want to talk about to their friends. It's really not a very pleasant subject.... I do know several women who are involved and have a great grasp of the info but I'd say they are the minority by far.
This is a huge boost to the momentum of the movement..... at the very least it opens the door to talk about this to more people.... because if you bring this up... they will have at least heard something about this.... and they now want to know more and be more open to listen.
KRAMER: "Gosh! -Here, let me pay all court costs!"
* Only a (-2)?
Perhaps I haven't asserted an stubborn enough attitude to get through to you!
First off, what sort of a "racist" works for Telemundo, and then goes around looking for ways to provide honest labor assignments for the poor? I mean, I am planning to move to Mexico City, (else fail with Hugo Chavez,) to partner with my best friend from grade school, when the lights go down...
Secondly, LA is no place for man nor beast, unless you already have a crib atop Mulholland Drive. I do know every inch of her, and I'm referring to that area south of Wilshire, near the 405. Of course, nevermind the FACT that 70% of the people North of there are --conservative whites-- who wouldn't hire a Mexican for --white collar-- work if their lives depended on it. So, you see a group of 20 idle men, give them a poster and $20.! ... Not enough? Make it $250.!
Is it your goal to disrupt
Is it your goal to disrupt by posting flame-bait like this? Sure seems like it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flamebait
Flamebait is a message posted to a public Internet discussion group, such as a forum, newsgroup or mailing list, with the intent of provoking an angry response (a "flame") or argument over a topic the troll often has no real interest in. (This is not to be confused with tweaking someone.)
There are various motives or explanations for this behavior. The most popular is the desire for attention and the desire for entertainment at the expense of others. Posted flamebait can provide the posting party with a controlled trigger-and-response setting in which to engage in conflicts and indulge aggressive behavior anonymously, without facing the consequences those behaviors would certainly bring to bear in real life. In other instances, flamebait may be used to reduce a forum's use by angering forum users.
Don't take the bait.
"What we really need is an
"What we really need is an actor coming forward for TV-FAKERY!" ~ CB Brooklyn
But this is why we have you CB =P
Question and Answer
Who filmed this?Are there any witnesses who saw the person film this? What type of camera was used?What is the frame time difference of the film?How far is the camera from the tower?How far is the camera from the plane?How many flors does the tower have from the bottom edge of this still photo to the top right of the tower?How long is that distance?How long is the distance from the towers right to left edge?How big are the windows and would it be possible for a human eye to see them crashing from this distance?Would it be possible for the camera to catch the windows crashing at this distance?
What type of plane is this?If the film is fake,and indeed all other films of this "fake event" how do you know what type of plane it is?How fast is the plane flying and how do you know how fast it flew if the film is fake?
When was this film shown on tv? How many cameras filmed this crash you say is fake?What camera types are they?Are there any relations between the cameramen?Are all films by the media or are some of them by private individuals?Which news companies/private persons operated these cameras?Were any of the films show live on tv?
The planes left wing seems visible to me, or at least as visible as the planes left tail wing.The plane and the building seems to have the same color/light..Is it possible that the camera couldn't catch the color/light difference and details considering the speed of this moving object and the distance to the building and plane?
How can you see that this left wing has touched the building yet?The still picture is taken from a right angle, does that not explain why the planes right wing looks slightly bigger than it's left wing,which makes this left wing appear to penetrate the building?(as does the left tail wing)
Is it not plausible, and a logical explanation,that since there appears to be no damage to the building,that that is because the plane is not touching the building yet on this still picture, or is it that the camera cannot differentiate the details at this distance?
You call this film a fake, how bad is it from 1 to 10 with 10 being best? Could whoever would have fake it have done a better job?How long time did they have to fake it.Did they have time to look it over frame for frame like I asume you have done?How good or bad a job do you think the proposed fakers thought it was?How long time ago before 9/11 do you think it was planned to,in your words, fake these films?Do you think they would have had time to rehearse the "faking" Are there any examples of this proposed "film faking" in history of real events(non fiction) and have they been exposed?
I expect your personal answers on this blog and not a reference to a website or a copy of one or its contents. Please,take your time.
(Quotation marks are referencing to your idea of "fake film" and not meant as sarcasm,ridicule or any kind of ad hominem)
Why don't you take a few
Why don't you take a few lesson about physics of video compression... It might help you to cure your TV-FAKERY illness.
good answer
good answer
It's a camera issue
common sense tells me it's a camera issue.I'm sure videocompression play a part too. These videos/films were the first thing I looked at over and over again even before webfairy came up with the tv-fakery theory.I guess we all saw Dave Von Kleist "In Plane Sight"
Hey Charlie...
"I think that we have to look at these alternative groups and these alternative people who are continuing to make films and bring their research to the public."
Sally Regenhard - 9/11 Family Member
Jon Gold: That picture is NOT CB_Brooklyn.
Gold: you are an extreme, bumbling idiot and are causing trouble, possibly for yourself. No, that is NOT a threat from me, but I recommend you behave yourself.
Sounds like a threat to me...
"I think that we have to look at these alternative groups and these alternative people who are continuing to make films and bring their research to the public."
Sally Regenhard - 9/11 Family Member
But anyway...
I'll ask again. What are your credentials? Please provide documentation that would show me the University you attended, and the degree you obtained, and how it is relevant to the information you are promoting.
"I think that we have to look at these alternative groups and these alternative people who are continuing to make films and bring their research to the public."
Sally Regenhard - 9/11 Family Member
But...
You're the one who's always saying how scientifically stupid everyone that doesn't agree with you is.
"I think that we have to look at these alternative groups and these alternative people who are continuing to make films and bring their research to the public."
Sally Regenhard - 9/11 Family Member
Elaborate
which basic physics supposedly supports your theory?
You make 2 contradictory
You make 2 contradictory points. On one hand the plane is so weak that it couldn't damage the steel and on the other hand it was so strong that it should have decelerated more upon entry.
You have no argument on the "physics" you just repeat that you do over-and-over, and you skirt the issue of whether you have even taken a physics class in your life. Maybe you should spend less time trying to divide the movement and more time trying to do more than be a parrot of disinformation (like I show above regarding Jeff King).
No, Jeff King is not a
No, Jeff King is not a "no-planer". You have just fallen for misinformation (surprise).
Words straight from Jeff King's own mouth
http://www.911blogger.com/node/3231#comment-75245
Actually I do think that planes hit the Twin Towers, though probably not the specified passenger liners. There is some funny business that makes me think that they were specially rigged in some way, but I have never questioned that some kind of real, physical planes hit the buildings.
The Tarpley interview is here: http://www.plaguepuppy.net/public_html/video%20archive/index.htm#ti
The confusion about my being a "no planer" comes from the first part of the show which is an interview with Nico Haupt. Nico is something of an odd character, and was going on about some kind of nanotechnology being the key to 9-11(influenced by Karl Schwarz I believe). It made no sense to me, and my part of the interview dealt only with controlled demolition. Nico was very disruptive at the 9/11/04 NYC conference, and many consider him a disinfo agent.
http://www.911blogger.com/node/3231#comment-75248
This is a total misrepresentation: I did not "chime in" with Nico about no planes. I had the misfortune of following him on Tarpley's show, and had no control over that. He ran over into the second hour, and Tarpley tried to segue by asking me some questions while still talking to Haupt.
I said nothing to endorse his ideas, which in any case were so confusing that I don't even know what he was claiming. If there is other disinfo out there linking me to this, please let me know so I can go to the source. What exactly did you see 2 months ago?
I don't know what else it will take to show you how you are a victim of misinformation. You think that Jeff King (aka Plague Puppy) buys into the "no plane theory" when he does not. Why is that? Because Nico Haupt and others continue to let people believe it even though King himself thinks the idea is crazy. Why would they do that? To tarnish Jeff King's reputation while at the same time convincing easily led victims like you into believing that he supports the theory (when he clearly doesn't). I fully expect you to keep this in mind in the future and to encourage others to STOP associating his name with this theory which he does NOT support.
What?!?
You seem to think an advanced degree of some sort is required to understand TV-Fakery, but it's not. Anyone who took elementary physics in high school (Issac Newton laws, etc) should have no problem piecing this together.
Besides, you know that there are scientists with advanced degrees and/or experience who know the planes were fake.
Dr Jeff King (MD) - B.S. Electrical Engineering, MIT
He tells us that you don't need an "advanced degree" to understand TV-Fakery, and then references a list of individuals who "KNOW the planes were fake."
Now, however, "TV-Fakery and no-planes are two different things."
Idiot.
"I think that we have to look at these alternative groups and these alternative people who are continuing to make films and bring their research to the public."
Sally Regenhard - 9/11 Family Member
OK, so show me where he has
OK, so show me where he has advocated "TV-Fakery". You are clearly saying he does, now prove it.
You sound just like someone in the Bush administration. Always speak in absolutes and never admit your wrong.
I will be waiting for something showing that Jeff King supports "TV-Fakery". When you realize you are wrong I'll expect you to post you were wrong.
If I can still see wing....
If I can still see wing.... then it has not penetrated....
try again
the plane is very clear on
the plane is very clear on this photo:
http://z.about.com/d/politicalhumor/1/0/r/E/wtctourist1.jpg
That is a well known
That is a well known photoshop that appeared immediately after 9/11.
Really?
Really?
.
.
???
Charlie, take a vacation, buddy.
You are completely incorrect
You are completely incorrect (yet again).
http://www.snopes.com/rumors/crash.htm
http://touristofdeath.com/
This photo is a known fake and has been the subject of ongoing 'inside jokes' amongst popular internet photoshop forums like fark.com and somethingawful.com for years. But you think it is real (unlike the 50+ videos of the second impact), what a surprise.
This one's real. It is NOT PhotoShopped!!!
Larry Silverstein witnesses 1st plane impact!
linking to snopes...
Is very odd on this forum, since they are clearly disinfo in particular with regard to 9/11. Just look at how they stick up for the official story.
____
Real Truther a.k.a. Verdadero Verdadero
WTCdemolition.com - Harvard Task Force
"NOT PhotoShopped" ###???
CB, you are amazing. Either that, or you suddenly show some sort of humour i dont understand.
If you really think that is real, then, sorry, it is 101% over for you. You lost the last 0.0001% of credibility right there. LOL.
You LIE!
You just don't understand tv-fakery!
erh,
i was refering to this pic , and CBs comment to it, just to clarify..:
http://z.about.com/d/politicalhumor/1/0/r/E/wtctourist1.jpg
not sure what you mean by "lie".
conerning tvfakery, i think i understand pretty well what its purpose is, actually. You don't have to explain me once again.
HAHAHAHAHAHA
Gotcha!
my mistake
I thought you referred to the one I posted
http://www.911blogger.com/node/4865#comment-95882
Dork
lol
Negative 15!!! A New
Negative 15!!! A New Record!!!
Congrats CB!
see here
http://www.911blogger.com/node/4865#comment-96232
looks can be deceiving
Or the plane is not touching the building.looks can be deceiving.
Digg it
http://www.digg.com/videos_educational/911_The_Greatest_Lie_Evers_Sold_B...
jonhs.net/911/
I've seen it on:
jonhs.net/911/
Lot's of 9/11 and Iraq documentaries- tell your friends! I'm not affiliated with the site,just think it is a good reference source.
that is the worst 9/11
that is the worst 9/11 related movie Ive seen.
ok, but which are the bests
ok, but which are the bests ones you've seen?
agreed, jac
Greatest Lie Ever Sold is one of the most poorly made pieces of junk I've ever seen--I got it at the same time as I got in Plane Site to begin my research in earnest and was very disappointed. No doubt an early disinfo entry.
____
Real Truther a.k.a. Verdadero Verdadero
WTCdemolition.com - Harvard Task Force
I still haven't seen a video
I still haven't seen a video for this.....anyone have it?
looks like it will be replayed later this month.... someone snag it!!!
The View’
Actor James Brolin; actor Jeffrey Carlson.
Original Air Date: December 6, 2006
Descriptors: Repeat Episode
All 'The View' Airings
Upcoming Episode Airings:
Time Warner Cable - Digital Non-Reb, Forest Hills, NY 11375
Edit Your TV Location
Episode Date & Time Channel Actions
The View (CC,STEREO)
Actor James Brolin; actor Jeffrey Carlson. Tue 12/26/06
11:00 AM CDT 7 WABC
The View (CC,STEREO,HDTV)
Actor James Brolin; actor Jeffrey Carlson. Tue 12/26/06
11:00 AM CDT 707 WABCDT
lost highway, twin peaks, 9/11, Bill Pullman's face
I was so wowed when I came across this David Lynch interview. Lost Highway and Twin Peaks and Mulholland Drive, Greil Marcus's essay about Bill Pullman's face, have articulated for me on an artistic level the emotional experience of finding out the truth about 9/11.
whoowaa: Add Comment
e-mail Barbara Walters
I checked out the "The View" shows web-site and noticed there is an e-mail form where you can ask Barbara Walters and the other hosts questions or give feed-back. I just used it to ask Walters to have Brolin back and explain his stance on 9/11. I urge all other 9/11 truthers to do the same. http://abc.go.com/daytime/theview/ Lets bombard them!
if we could stay nobler than namecalling, slamming others?
if we could be above reproach, it only ennobles our inquiry ~ this is hard enough to do without putting people off with off-putting derision, mocking, taunting, slander...