Full transcript is here.

Many people would rather read than watch a video (especially if they're at work), so I spent my evening transcribing it. This one needs to go far and wide. Richard rocks!

Thanks for all you do. It's moments of sunlight like this that make the arduous journey worth it.

Breakthrough is the word I was looking for.

What we need now is many more Richard Gages.

All over.

Thanks Sheila for the excellent transcript.

Here is KMPH on MORE 911 TRUTH INFO.

Controversial Group Re–Examines 9/11 In Clovis

http://www.kmph.com/Global/story.asp?s=10427820

ACTUAL KMPH LINK.

Great Day Talks To Architect Richard Gage About 9/11

Click at 1st Search Result here:

http://www.kmph.com/Global/SearchResults.asp?vendor=wss&qu=richard+gage

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it

It was there.Last night I suggested to TomT that he submit his latest as a "video response".
There were more than a dozen already.

This morning there are none.

No speculations. Just accurate, precise observations. All three observations are spot on.

The more solid and clear our arguments, the better is our chance to draw the scientific community's attention.

Excellent points, Jon. I agree up to the point except where you say "it also wouldnt hurt to mention the multitude of other cover-ups, and lies."

I like how Richard speaks from a professional point of view and is loathe to get too far into "conspiracy territory". Due to the subject matter, They are just waiting for an opportunity to jump on him for speaking too far from his field of expertise. However, mentioning the families calls for a new investigation and HR 847 are superb points to bring up in future interviews.

Does that make sense or did I just ramble there? Its been a long day.

________________________
“The greatest purveyor of violence in the world today -- my own government.” -Martin Luther King, Jr.
http://www.mikeruppert.blogspot.com
http://www.ubuntu.com
Dont preach it, just mention it :)

Familiarize himself with talking points about NORAD lying, the ridiculousness of the 9/11 Commission, etc... there is more to the story than how those buildings came down. In my opinion, if he is going to get media attention, then he needs to improve or enhance his message to include everything. Or at least, be familiarized enough about it to be able to talk about it. I understand how the buildings came down is his specialty, but again, if he is the only one the media is going to give attention to, then he should expand his message.

But he uses the phrase "We're not conspiracy theorists, just building professionals" anytime anyone asks him about the reasons for it or the whys of it. That was my point.

And you're right, the way the buildings came down is not the entire story of 9/11 -- Crossing the Rubicon, Press For Truth, Towers of Deception, and other similar works proved that. I believe the reason that Richard Gage is given a voice in the MSM is because as Mike Ruppert says, physical evidence arguments can be spun to death in the court room no matter how much sense they make, they can never be as solid as a quote from Dick Cheney, or a NORAD document, etc. Back and to the left, correct?

By parading him around on television, they can ignite the endless arguments over CD and pretend that no other significant 9/11 information exists. Frustrating as that may be, we've got to celebrate even little victories like this.

________________________
“The greatest purveyor of violence in the world today -- my own government.” -Martin Luther King, Jr.
http://www.mikeruppert.blogspot.com
http://www.ubuntu.com
Dont preach it, just mention it :)

I don't find it frustrating at all. I actually think Ruppert had it wrong. The Loaded Gun of nanothermite is a fact that will go down in history in many areas -- we really have no proof that it could not stand up on it's own in a court of law, as much as Ruppert believes that to be the case. He has his own agenda, which is fine. And he does know a lot, but that doesn't mean he knows everything, and he has no crystal ball to predict the future. He's human, like everyone else.

I don't necessarily agree that he needs to "enhance his message to include everything." It's possible that could help, but I think he's doing very well as it is. And it's possible that if he tried to put out a slew of other ideas that his strong message could get lost. That's what the term "sound byte" is all about, and unfortunately, that often works best for Americans, who can only handle 2 or 3 facts or personalities at a time -- more only dilutes things for them.

Remember when he said the 9/11 truth movement was over? Turns out it wasn't.

Richard does mention a select series of facts along with his evidence of demolition, however, if people have specifics they want him to mention, they should email him and ask him. Neither physical evidence nor other evidence is the only evidence.

Richard's strength is that he keeps things focused on some of our most powerful evidence, evidence that is now a part of the scientific record and cannot be removed from history, as those on wikipedia are frantic to do.

Each one of us came to the truth about 9/11 through a particular door. I think for most of us, it was the recognition of the fact that the buildings were destroyed through controlled demolitions. Once a particular part of the official story falls, the rest of the story automatically gets called into question. I would not have questioned the story of what happened at the Pentagon if I had not already been convinced of CD. But I didn't need to even hear about questions regarding the Pentagon in order to join the movement.

I think it's a mistake to believe that any and every opportunity to speak to mainstream media calls for the "kitchen sink" approach. There's enough communications research out there that proves that focused, high-quality communication is far more effective than diffuse, high-quantity communication. Richard Gage is very skilled in the former and this is why he is emerging as one of our most important colleagues when it comes to public outreach.

On Facebook, so I might as well post it here. What the hell...

"I no longer like Michael Ruppert. I still like some of his work, but I no longer like the man. That being said, this clip from his movie "The Truth & Lies About 9/11" is something that influenced me GREATLY. Keep in mind, this took place in Nov. 2001. This is very old, and I have been doing this a long time. I firmly believe that this method, along with me busting my ass A LOT, is what has given me whatever "notoriety" I have (if that's what you want to call it). I don't shun Controlled Demolition. When Steven Jones came out, I was a HUGE advocate of his. To a layman such as myself with no PHD, he makes EXTREMELY convincing arguments, and I believe he deserves to be heard. But he came out at the end of 2005. I had already been doing "this" for 2 - 2 1/2 years. I was already practicing this method... so promoting it was/is difficult for me. As I said, this method has worked for me. It enables me to reach people. That is, after all, what we are trying to do. Because it has worked for me, I guess I try to push this method off onto other people. For that, I am sorry. I know the families have questions about the buildings. If the question is important to them, then it is important to me. It's really that simple. I hope that people understand my "way."

I also said, "You know what I would like to see happen? I would like students to take the recent paper to their science teachers, and ask them to take a look at it."

And I WOULD like to see that happen.

Also, when something "big" comes out in the CD world, I STILL post it.

Edit: By the way, this is nothing new... I've said this stuff several times before.