National AIA Convention Will Vote On WTC7 Resolution

Atlanta, GA - May 14-16 2015

http://www.aia.org/aiaucmp/groups/aia/documents/pdf/aiab105885.pdf

(page 26) Resolution 5-6

Title: 7 World Trade Center

Sponsors: Daniel Barnum, FAIA and Fifty Members of the Institute

Intent: To cause the AIA to adopt a Position Statement in support of a new investigation into the complete collapse of 7 World Trade Center on September 11, 2001.

WHEREAS, under the AIA Public Policies and Position Statements, it is the responsibility of architects to design a resilient environment that can more successfully adapt to natural conditions and that can more readily absorb and recover from adverse events; and
WHEREAS, architects and others involved in the design and construction of buildings depend upon the information obtained from investigations into building failures to inform the development of model building codes; and
WHEREAS, on September 11, 2001, 7 World Trade Center, a 47-story high-rise building, suffered a complete collapse; and
WHEREAS, on November 20, 2008, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) released the final report of its three-year investigation into the complete collapse of 7 World Trade Center, which concluded that fires, an unprecedented cause of failure for a modern high-rise building, were the primary cause of failure; and
WHEREAS, the cause of failure identified by the NIST investigation would mean that hundreds of high-rise buildings in the United States are susceptible to similar failure from fire; and
WHEREAS, thousands of members of the architecture and engineering professions, including the 55 sponsors of this resolution, believe the NIST investigation did not adhere to the principles of the scientific method and, as a result, the conclusions of the NIST investigation are fatally flawed.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the AIA Board of Directors shall adopt a Position Statement, to be published in the AIA Directory of Public Policies and Position Statements, stating:
The AIA’s belief that incidents involving the catastrophic failure of buildings and other structures must be investigated using the highest standards of science-based investigation and analysis in order to provide accurate and meaningful information in the development of model building codes;
The AIA’s recognition that many members of the architecture profession believe the NIST investigation into the complete collapse of 7 World Trade Center on September 11, 2001, did not adhere to the principles of the scientific method and, as a result, the conclusions of the NIST investigation are fatally flawed;
The AIA’s belief that this perspective merits further study; and
The AIA’s support for a new investigation into the complete collapse of 7 World Trade Center.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that it is advised that this Position Statement be incorporated as Position Statement #3 under the Construction Industry Regulation Public Policy. The recommended language of this Position Statement is as follows:
3. World Trade Center 7
The AIA believes that incidents involving the catastrophic failure of buildings and other structures must be investigated using the highest standards of science-based investigation and analysis in order to provide accurate and meaningful information in the development of model building codes. In adherence to the scientific method, investigations should:
Consider all available data;
Consider hypotheses that most readily explain the available data;
Test those hypotheses and analyze the results without bias; and
Provide for external review and replication by making all data available.
The AIA recognizes that many members of the architecture profession believe the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) investigation into the complete collapse of 7 World Trade Center on September 11, 2001, did not adhere to these principles and, as a result, the conclusions of the NIST investigation are fatally flawed. The AIA believes this perspective merits further study and supports a new investigation into the complete collapse of 7 World Trade Center.

http://us1.campaign-archive1.com/?u=d03bf3ffcac549c7dc7888ef5&id=4d02fb1bef

http://ae911truth.org

This is a milestone!

milestone - an action or event marking a significant change or stage in development.

Especially if it passes

Let's hope it does.

great!

thanks

A Cynical Question

When I see opportunities like this one, I can't help but wonder, "What could be done by the defenders of the 9/11 villainy to prevent a good decision by the gathered architects?" The obvious answer is, "Who's counting the votes?" Perhaps the 9/11 Truth team should explore what processes are being used for collecting and counting the votes and take whatever action they can to be certain that the voting process is transparent.

That kind of intervention

would be happening long before any votes took place, likely. Keeping in mind, though, the exposure this will bring to the issue -- very powerful and definitely overdue. For the resolution to actually pass would be some kind of miraculous icing on the cake.

PS: is there typically discussion on these resolutions? That would be interesting to see.