When you post your OpEd news pieces, feel free to simultaneously post them here on your personal blog, I might not post them to the front page, but more people will see them.

Dr. Barrett, after you have Margulis on your show you should have Dr. Garth Nad Nancy Nicolson as well, discussing their new book Project Day Lily, here is some background

Hiv is probably harmless. its only in 1/1000 cells and doesnt do anything when injected into animals. Some of the top scientists in the world have spoken out against the hypothesis. Nobel prize winners like Kary Mullis and Walter gilbert a Harvard MCB professer, Retroviral UCB expert Duesberg, Dr. Shyh Ching Lo the military's highest ranking infectious disease pathologist, amongst many more. See the film hiv fact or fraud.
http://www.archive.org/details/aids_scam

The only microbe to worry about is mycoplasma incogitus/penetrans. This was what was part of the biological weapons program and was discovered by Dr. Shyh Ching Lo of the army. Every animal he injected it with died. When two top Cancer researchers found it in the blood of sick Gulf war one vets armed agents from the DOD threatened them to stop their research, and their boss was shot in the head five times right after he told Garth and Nancy Nicolson it was part of the biological weapons program and being illegally tested. Read their new mindblowing book Project Day Lily.
http://www.projectdaylily.com/

Think mycoplasmas are Harmless? Read this excerpt from a Miami herald article on a summary of Dr. Lo's peer reviewed work.

"Lo laid all his cards on the table. He had detected an organism similar to a bacteria, called a mycoplasma, in cells taken from AIDS patients. He could not find the organism in cells of healthy individuals. When he injected the organism into four silvered leaf monkeys, three quickly developed low-grade fevers. All four lost weight. All four died within seven to nine months of infection. When they were autopsied, there was Lo's mycoplasma in their brains, livers and spleens.

Lo also reported finding the mycoplasma in the damaged tissue of six HIV-negative human beings who had died from unspecified causes after suffering from suspiciously AIDS-like symptoms. "

Is Hiv Guilty Miami Herald 1990
http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/hiv/ebhiv.htm

Well that sounds a lot better, it's just I had great appreciation for your article "Apocalypse of Coercion" - I thought that was fantastic, and for a long time I'd refer people to your work without any hesitation. But then while everyone else saw and responded to the damage individuals like Reynolds, Fetzer and Wood were causing, you seemed to not recognise it all and in fact defend Fetzer's behaviour and sort of went over the cliff with him in "Fetzer's Big Bus Of Bunk" instead of bailing out at the last minute.

What I'm talking about are things like this, if you didn't write it then you should sue Fetzer:

"Kevin Barrett, the founder of MUJCA and a member of Scholars, reports he is troubled by these new studies. “I guess I’ll have to take this possibility more seriously now,” Barrett said. “In the past, I have assumed video fakery was far-fetched and that anyone who endorsed it was probably a crackpot! Now I’m not so sure.”
http://66.102.9.104/search?q=cache:84gX5eMlwMIJ:twilightpines.com/index....

^ If those are your words why did you lend credence to such absurd and offensive garbage? I mean your embracing not only the quackery of Fetzer, Reynolds and Judy "Forks go in Microwaves" Wood, but also Nico-Intelpro Haupt, Rick Siegel and all the other dregs of the planet who have unfortunately gravitated towards association with 9/11 Truth. It baffles me, also how could you be friends with Fetzer after the way he treated Dr Jones? That was just utterly shameful on Fetzer's part and so it was immensely confusing to see anyone sticking with him after that.

It's this video which was the nail in the coffin in regards to being able to confidently refer people to your work without having to be concerned that they would discover something ridiculous like "no planes hit the WTC" disinfo material in the process, thus turning them off entirely from the subject:

I hope that you have come to your senses and finally thought about your loyalty to the credibility of 9/11 Truth over any perhaps misplaced loyalty to individuals like Fetzer, because I do still think some of your work is excellent and that your contribution to the issue has been a good one over all. It's just a little hard to now promote what you've produced with the other things your unfortunately associated with still floating around on the net.

Some guy on the bus talking to his wife said, "A tower got hit." We were on the FDR Drive above he Brooklyn Bridge. I looked out the window and saw the burning tower. Then, the other tower exploded. I knew it was terrorism. I thought it was an explosion and I never saw a plane.

[edit: But I'm absolutely certain beyond any shadow of a doubt that on the other side of tower two there was a plane approaching as I watched and it smashed into the tower causing the large fireball I saw coming out of the front.]

Course I was North and East.

[edit: I couldn't see the plane that certainly hit the tower from my position.]

All I know is this:

Last November 2, Bandar bush confessed to knowing that September 11 could have been avoided.

Bandar bush threatened Tony Blair with "another 7/7.

Bandar bush is the only guy bush's disgusting Republican Mommy lets smoke in her house.

One thing is for sure:

Bandar bush could have prevented 9/11, he threatened further terrorism against our Ally, and he is an "Adopted" member of GHW Bush the Republican and his Republican wife, and all their Republican Offspring.

Bandar bush: even if the White House wouldn't do what you wanted, or ask you respectfully for your opinion about world events, when you knew New York was about to be attacked, as you confessed, WHY didn't you warn the American People?

>>I am generally tolerant of ridiculous opinions. Some of my best friends, and even some family members, are "no controlled demolition" lunatics. I do not ostracize them. I engage them.

Being against controlled demolition is a polar opposite situation to claiming that real planes didn't hit the towers, so this is another strawman argument.

People who accept the official story are everyday people who follow what authority tells them, often because it makes them feel comfortable. There is a massive media campaign to influence them. No brainer.

People who think real planes didn't hit the towers are often unable to listen to reason, unable to function in groups or blogs like this one, and uninterested or misinformed about the scientific method.

Some sound eloquent but when listeners pause for a moment they realize it is nonsense. Some are even aggressive and belligerent. Rescuing no planers, DEW or nuke advocates to defend against average activists who see through the nonsense -- regardless of the intention -- only bogs down the movement in nonsense and turns us into a nursing home, not an activist and research community. We aren't running a nursing home or a pre-school or a day treatment, we're trying to expose a crime.

Defending people who are saying nutty unsupported claims about a crime in public which blatantly discredit a whole movement -- with the platitude of "evidence doesn't matter" anyway, and "I am generally tolerant of ridiculous opinions" -- helps no one but those in need of making ridiculous statements to reporters and the public.