you are wasting your time trying to reason with a female thug like Amy Goodman. She is a lost cause and should be treated as such. I have about as much respect for her as I do for Dick Cheney or George Bush.

http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2007/05/structural-engineers-questi...

nausea7543
When the student is ready the teacher will come.

I made the video of Amy when Kevin Barrett reiterated her statements " Journalist need to go where the silence is " and we need to do some Ground Zero reporting. Amy Goodman stated that day that 9/11 Commission Report was inadequate. It just might be that Amy is more willling to talk about this issue from the perspective of those that were on the commission and are now talking or writing about their experiences on the 9/11 Commission. Let's give her more rope and see if she continues to follow-up with more broadcasts and interviews on this subject. Let's see if she's willing to swing freely on that rope or hang herself by letting the subject die.

ago. Last I saw of Goodman, her show was like CNN lite. She wasn't really critizing the Iraq war, wasn't really supporting Code Pink or other anti-war groups, she was giving Bush free passes on almost everything, she was rather hostile towards 9/11 truth, etc.

Now I don't know what to make of Goodman. She has zero credibility with me at this time.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consider mass emailing truth messages. More info here: http://www.911blogger.com/node/13321

IMO, 9/11 skepticism is not about some exclusive club. The whole point is to put pressure on the political/media establishment to honestly address the questions. For too long they have been able to hide behind a wall of propaganda, authoritarianism, denial and fearmongering.

I would challenge Amy Goodman to have Dave Frasca, Rod Middleton or Rich B. (former Alec Station chief) on her show. It is beyond bizarre that these officials have been able to avoid the spotlight for years despite having extremely crucial positions in the lead up to 9/11.

Reprehensor this is a great letter to Goodman. However it is likely that it is falling on deaf ears. Not to discourage this sort of approach, but just trying not to lose hold of the fact that Goodman is a gate keeper. She is appearing to move closer towards investigating 911 more seriously. This most probably means that the establishment is moving towards the phase of hanging some individuals out to dry in an attempt to put 911 to rest once and for all. To do this successfully without turning over the apple cart they'll have to put their gate keepers to work in order to steer more inquiries into the channels they'd like people to look at. Amy Goodman certainly has a half a brain, though not likely much more than that, and for her to pretend not to know the facts and evidence about 911 and then easily conclude that elements of the our government were involved in the massacre of thousand of US citizens, well, this means Goodman is a compromised individual. Again, I am not discouraging your letter or others from this approach; I just don't want people losing sight over who are our clear allies are and who needs to be looked at through a filter. Goodman needs to be filtered.

Again, great letter Reprehensor

Many of these criticisms of Amy Goodman are justified, but we should be careful not to alienate someone who looks like a potential ally. Have some regard for her position and her supporters. The CIA tapes thing just may turn out to be the watershed event, and she has carried that story some distance. The inclusion of the guy from NBC and Ratner was important as it demonstrates some turning in the establishment media and even in the liberal establishment. Keep the issues alive and we will see more progress. Fingers crossed on Bill Moyers and the Griffin-book-recommendation story tonight.

Is it a question or a line of investigation? Yeah the silence around the "I" word, or as I would say the Z.S. words is disturbing, especially when it comes
to big time Jewish public intellectuals such as Amy Goodman and Noam Chomsky.

Fragments on 9-11 Truth, Justice and Peace from a ‘Young’ Jewish Intellectual: Part 1- "Breaking the Silence Barrier"

"My column will include voices so often excluded, people whose views the media mostly ignore, issues they distort and even ridicule."— Amy Goodman from her first piece for her weekly column "Breaking the Sound Barrier"

“Of course, there will be those who demand silent obedience. We expect that from the ultra-right, and anyone with a little familiarity with history will expect it from some left intellectuals as well, perhaps in an even more virulent form. But it is important not to be intimidated by hysterical ranting and lies and to keep as closely as one can to the course of truth and honesty and concern for the human consequences of what one does, or fails to do. All truisms, but worth bearing in mind. Beyond the truisms, we turn to specific questions, for inquiry and for action.”—Noam Chomsky from the last page in his pamphlet “9-11”

I start with these statements from two prominent public intellectuals because, beyond both being Jewish people, their words hint at a matured, compassionate and wise Jewish approach to engaging the world. I also bring them up, in resonance with my namesake Jeremiah, to point out the latent hypocrisy and failure, so far, of these two Jewish heavyweights of public life to live up to their powerful words in relationship to the Truth of 9-11, just as the ancient Hebrews failed at many points to live up to the potent words of the Torah before ultimately bringing forth many of its profound teachings into our present world.

I include the words “so far” because any attempt to invoke the name of a prophet such as Jeremiah is not about freezing people, or a people, in time and projecting it inevitably forwards, but about a notice and warning of the dire consequences of omissive and dismissive hypocrisy, and, more importantly, a catalyst for the opening of possibility. Transformation is the desired result of any proper Jeremiad.

Despite common and simplistic notions of the interminable Jewish tendency towards suffering and existential hopelessness, we Jews hold with deep care the possibility for Redemption at any moment. Yes, some of it is always delayed, but its pulsing presence is repeatedly being traced in the little over-comings and larger transcendences of our lives. I should say at the outset that I consider myself to be a Jewish man, Ashkenazi by blood, who draws deeply from my Jewish roots in my spiritual and philosophical outlook.

Before I go too far philosophically and psychologically, let me be clear about my belief in regards to the Jewish and/or Israeli role in 9-11. We, ‘Da Joos, didn’t do it any more than the Christians or the Muslims did it. However, Jewish people, or at least people who call themselves "Jews" have played important roles in the wide spectrum of the 9-11 attacks and their aftermath. At the very least, people who call themselves ‘Jewish’ and have great allegiance to a certain image of ‘Israel’ have played an overwhelming role in the 'intellectual' justifications and reasoning behind the War on (or of) Terror. And, from my perspective, this overwhelming ‘Jewish’ presence on the side of those propagating the myth-drenched War on Terror is inversely proportional to the underwhelming presence of real, forthright Jewish intellectual weight on the side of the 9-11 Truth movement.

Thus far, there has largely been a simplistic type of thinking around this issue: "Da Joos did it" versus "shh, don't talk about Israel, people will associate 9-11 Truth with anti-Semitism." Real talk has been lost in the gulf. That is why this essay points to the great void of public Jewish intellectuals who grapple with 9-11 Truth from an open and proud Jewish perspective. There was some really good work in the book “9/11 and American Empire: Christians, Jews and Muslims Speak Out,” edited by Kevin Barrett, John Cobb and Sandra Lubarsky. But overall, not much above a hushed whisper has been consistently expressed from people who openly proclaim and stress their Jewishness while pointing to the clear aspect of a ‘Jewish’ and/or ‘Israeli’ role in 9-11 and the aftermath.

It shows the crazy “doublespeak” state of our language right now that the word "anti-Semitism" is used to squash talk about Israel, when the large majority of people actually in the ruling elite in Israel are not technically Semitic. I have made the point before that the War on Terror fueled by the Big Lie of 9-11 is an anti-Semitic endeavor, being that Arabs are Semitic people. To be more honest and accurate, we should talk of “anti-Jewishness” and there definitely is that spectre on the fringes of the 9-11 truth movement.

The issue of talking about "Jewishness" in relation to geo-politics and 9-11 points to the crucial need for a thick and complex understanding of people, institutions, religious groups, nations. The whole "The Jews did it," “The Muslims did it,” "The military did it," "The US government did it" scenario-building enterprise is dead in the water and we need a much more sophisticated thought process that allows us to call out bigoted and, frankly, stupid analysis while allowing real talk about real people and real forces in our world.

The people who architected the attacks of September of ’01 are not ‘Jewish’ any more than they are ‘Christian’ or ‘Muslim,’ or in that case, ‘American,’ ‘Israeli’ or ‘British.’ The people who architected 9-11 are from an international, or more accurately, trans-national criminal over-class of fascists, supremacists and oligarchs. And they can come in any color, creed or proclaimed nationality or religion.

However, as I suggested earlier, the neo-con ideology that helps drive this global, criminal project, represents a confluence of British and American Imperialists along with a large number of Israeli Zionist Supremacists. Additionally, the enemy image necessary for Western societies to muster the necessary will for the Global Domination Project articulated by everybody from neo-con intellectual Puba Leo Strauss to American Cultural Imperialist Samuel Huntington and Realpolitik pundit and practitioner Zbigniew Brezinski, is unusually torqued and acute in the Jewish psyche. Having been the recipient of that projected enemy image persistently throughout our history, there has been a certain taking on of that mantle among the Jewish peoples. Similar to Tupac Shakur’s proclamation of “It’s Just Me Against the World,” the Jewish Diaspora has a tendency to take a “It’s Just We Against the World” stance.

At the very same time, the wiser and more mature aspects of the Jewish psyche have transmuted historical ostracism into deeper compassion for the suffering of others and the need for justice. Evidence of this is the large number of Jewish people who were involved in the civil rights movement.

A Jew is a person of God. And the Torah and our history as a people have taught us that an essential part of being a “person of God” is to seek justice for all people. It's time, in my mind for we Jews of good faith to call out the impostors who seem more like Nazis than Jews in their ideologies about Palestinians as savages and their actions in support of a total war to dominate the Arab world. Because, as evidenced by the European Holocaust, more ethically devastating than the horrific actions of a small criminal cabal, is the silence of way too many of the rest of us ‘good’ people.

An attempt at being authentically Jewish, especially at times of moral crisis, necessitates the possibility of speaking one’s conscience in the face of oppressive, violent and, potentially, catastrophic silence.

“Strange times are these in which we live when old and young are taught in falsehoods school. And the one man that dares to tell the truth is called at once a lunatic and fool.” –Plato

"We must speak the truth about terror." --George W. Bush