This is the latest from Kevin Barrett:

***

Khalid Sheikh Mohammed Wants to Slay Us!

by Kevin "Irish Muslim" Barrett
http://mujca.com

3/17/2007
(as-salaamu alaikum and a top o' the marnin' to ye on this fine St. Paddy's day)

The 9/11 Commission Report is not a Report at all, but a spy novel by a certain Dr. Philip Zelikow.* Zelikow, a self-proclaimed specialist in "the creation and maintenance of public myths," offers plenty of footnotes but very little evidence to support his official version of events.

If you track down Zelikow's footnotes, you'll see that virtually the entire official story about the alleged "Muslim extremist hijackers" is based on a single, highly unreliable source: Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (KSM). Zelikow tells us that KSM was arrested in Pakistan in 2003, and his subsequent interrogation by US officials is the source of most of the "19 extremist hijackers" tale.

One little problem: There is no evidence that KSM was ever arrested, and lots of evidence that the whole story of his "arrest" was bogus.

As Paul Thompson points out in his Complete 9/11 Timeline:

March 10, 2003: Dubious Arrest Video Raises Question of KSM-ISI
(http://www.cooperativeresearch.or g/timeline.jsp?timeline=complete_911_timeline&startpos=2500#a072403helpe rs)

One week after the purported arrest of Khalid Shaikh Mohammed (KSM) in Pakistan, the (CIA-run)ISI show what they claim is a video of the capture. It is openly mocked as a bad forgery by the few reporters allowed to see it. [ABC News, 3/11/2003; Reuters, 3/11/2003; Pakistan News Service (Newark, CA), 3/11/2003; Daily Times (Lahore), 3/13/2003] For instance, a Fox News reporter says, “Foreign journalists looking at it laughed and said this is baloney, this is a reconstruction.” [Fox News, 3/10/2003]

If the KSM "arrest video" by the CIA-run ISI had you rolling in the aisles, watch out for his hilarious new "confession" -- you might die laughing! It's all part of a pernicious Muslim plot to slay Westerners with absurd humor. If you haven't yet realized the danger you are in, check out the lethal comedy at Azhar "Ayatollah of Comedy" Usman's site: http://azhar.com

--Kevin Barrett, 3/17/07

***

Please keep in mind that the only pictues they show over and over again are most probably fakes, too.

back from CNN in 2003:
http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/asiapcf/south/03/10/pakistan.mohammed/index.html

This is the one.
Most probably from the above mentioned ISI press conference on the "capture".
http://www.prisonplanet.com/pakistans_isi_breaks_silence_on_al_qaeda_captures.htm

But: It seems the ISI claimed, that this picture was taken immediately after his capture, even in the house where he had been arrested.
Seems logical, as he seems dozy, unshaved and wears underwear. And not prison clothes. And he stands in front a wall of peeling paint, not a sign for a state prison at all.

Because the family denied that this picture was taken in their house, somebody have had claimed it before.

See this link:

http://web.archive.org/web/20030409074219/http://www.nation.com.pk/daily/mar-2003/10/main/top3.asp

Quote:

While there is no doubting the huge importance of the capture of Khalid, last week's raid does leave many unanswered questions.Would
he really be travelling with phones, laptop computers, documents and lists of names in an organisation that for the past two years
has relied on foot messengers, knowing that phone calls can be intercepted and used to trace their position? The Qadoos family point
to the photo of Khalid released by Pakistani authorities, purportedly showing him under arrest in the house, looking fat and dazed
in a baggy vest as he stands against a wall of peeling paint. A thorough search of the house shows there is no such wall.

See also:
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/context.jsp?item=a030103mohammedarrest#a030103mohammedarrest
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0303/S00027.htm

So, we can easily assume the whole story is faked, from A to Z, including the phony Yosri Fouda interview.
There is no verified evidence for any part of the official story. None. Nada. Nothing.