I've been working on other stuff, but given the publication of Landis' article at opednews i have taken the time to respond- lots of html links, including one to Landis' article

Rebuttal to "Corrections": Paul Landis Response to my 9/11 "Pentagon Hole" Psyop article
http://www.opednews.com/maxwrite/diarypage.php?did=8370

This is a rebuttal to "CORRECTIONS" by Paul Landis, which was a response to my article, the link to which is formatted incorrectly in Landis’ and is currently not working:
Is the 9/11 "Pentagon Hole" a Psyop to Distract from Real Questions?

I posted the following comment on this article; people who feel strongly that a 757 didn't hit the Pentagon should really review the material at 911research.wtc7.net , they have a number of articles on the Pentagon, i linked one in my comment- the case is not persuasive to a great many sincere people, and may be a booby trap or intentional distraction. I support the release of ALL video and pics.

loosenuke wrote:
the official 9/11 story is BS, but the "pentagon hole" may be a red herring, it's been shown that 77 or a 757 could've caused the damage- when you look at ALL of the available photos, there's a 100 foot gash in the base, and it's possible the plane went into the building, getting shredded as it went- this is not solid evidence

The Pentagon No-757-Crash Theory: Booby Trap for 9/11 Skeptics by Jim Hoffman
http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/pentagontrap.html

Also, "victims" lists are not passenger lists:

Passenger Lists: Victims Lists, Passenger Manifests, and the Alleged Hijackers
http://911research.wtc7.net/planes/evidence/passengers.html

OCT supporter asks some good and some dumb questions. Note; for the sake of argument, i go along with his arguments about the Pentagon, as I personally believe the issue is an intentional distraction. I don't claim to know for sure what hit the Pentagon, I see how it could've been 77, but there are still anomalies- i advocate the release of ALL the video cameras- 360 degrees, the E4B, C4 and lack of fighter jets should be on those, too, right, in addition to non-CG footage of 77, if that's what it was?

http://adamholland.blogspot.com/2008/05/washington-state-greens-promote-911_30.html

In researching Washington State Green Party for a story on their advocacy of a deceptive referendum which would divest Seattle's pension fund from companies doing business in Israel (a story I hope to post soon), I was surprised to discover the extent to which they promote "9/11 truth" and other related conspiracy theories.