http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0705/S00557.htm

An Open Letter to Chris Matthews on: Political Assassinations, 9/11 and the Media

Kyle F. Hence
Executive Producer, 9/11: Press for Truth
http://www.911pressfortruth.com

Dear Mr. Matthews,

What has happened to you? On your Sunday show this past weekend you showed you remain in lock step with all or most of your colleagues and continue to demonstrate ignorance rather than the facts. How can you be so grossly out of step with most of the world on the question of the assassination of JFK? Why do you and most of the mainstream continue to ignore the findings of our own government which revisited the assassination in 1979 when the House formed the Committee on Assassination?

Acoustical and scientific evidence led to a conclusion of 'high probability' for conspiracy in the killing of Kennedy. And it might behoove you to take a another look at the video where the evidence is overwhelmingly clear.

Back and to the left.
Back and to the left.
Back and to the left.

http://fawcett911.us/audio/JFK-SecrecyAndSecretSocietiesAndMIcomplex.mp3
(about five minutes)

This is an important tape with direct relevance to 9/11 (unless you think recent history has no relevance).

In it JFK gives his ideas about gov't secrecy, the press, and the duty of the press to tell the truth and to inform the public.

Compare his words to what we hear today.

JFK was killed in '63, about fifteen years after the "shadow gov't" in its modern form really got going.

Listen to what he says. That's where we were as a nation not so long ago.

Consider 9/11 Blogger and what people are doing on these pages.

You can feel history with this one.

This is related to 9/11 because the JFK assassination is another case where the government whitewashed what really happened. Personally, I know almost nothing about the JFK assassination and take no position about who did it (although the new revelations from Hunt's son are very interesting).

But the fact that this story -- challenging a government whitewash -- is in the Washington Post makes it noteworthy. The more government lies are revealed, the more people will be open to questioning whether the government's version of 9/11, also, is not a lie.

Scientists Cast Doubt on Kennedy Bullet Analysis
Multiple Shooters Possible, Study Says

By John Solomon
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, May 17, 2007; Page A03

In a collision of 21st-century science and decades-old conspiracy theories, a research team that includes a former top FBI scientist is challenging the bullet analysis used by the government to conclude that Lee Harvey Oswald alone shot the two bullets that struck and killed President John F. Kennedy in 1963.

http://americanbuddhist.net/node/5718

A thinking person needs just one or two facts to begin understanding that there is much more to either story than we are normally told.

Some similarities:

—It is not possible for the bolt-action rifle allegedly used by Oswald to have fired that quickly. Similarly, it is not possible for the WTC Towers and WTC 7 to have collapsed at free-fall speed for the reasons given in the official story.

—The "single bullet" theory is obviously absurd. Similarly, it is absurd to claim that two airplanes were capable of destroying three buildings in precisely the same manner on 9/11.

—The Warren Commission was tightly controlled by Johnson and Hoover. Similarly, the 9/11 Commission was controlled by the Bush administration through its appointment of Phillip Zelikow, and others.

We all know that Bill O'Reilly is a hypocrite. Here is what he says about conspiracies on his current propaganda show, and what he had to say on Inside Edition years back.

Bill O says that it is "Anti-American" to believe that the government would conspire to kill Americans, but is shown to have done just that himself.

What a tool of the NWO. I wonder what made him change his tune?

Maybe this: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/10/20/entertainment/main650282.shtml

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5AQdphWO2SQ

Bill O'Reilly, when he was on Inside Edition, reports on Oswald's association with the CIA.

Gee Bill, here you are spouting a conspiracy theory! That's unamerican. Why do you hate this country, you two-faced hypocrite?

I'm not saying that you should be fired. I'm saying that Fox News has a BIG problem.

Just when was it that you turned to the dark side?

Joan Mellen's latest article on the murders of JFK and RFK, and their connection with 911 are a must read: http://www.joanmellen.net/truth.html . This can of worms has CIA clearly written on it, which is exactly as it should be. Nothing new in this thesis, of course, but she presents a lot of new facts to confirm it, and the article is well worth reading through, even though it is detailed and lengthy. It is only through the accumulation of these facts that people will eventually be convinced that the obvious is also true: the CIA is behind it all.

I know it's a bit tangential to 9/11, but in the interest of all things security state and NWO here's a story from yesterday's NY Post. It's also noteworthy because it is yet another voice from the intelligence community giving credence to so-called conspiracy theory (i.e., for those who don't think 9/11 could have been an inside job).

HUNT BLAMES JFK HIT ON LBJ

January 14, 2007 -- E. HOWARD Hunt - the shadowy former CIA man who organized the Watergate break-in and was once eyed in the assassination of President Kennedy - bizarrely says that Lyndon Johnson could be seen as a prime suspect in the rubout.

Only the most far-out conspiracy theorists believe in scenarios like Hunt's. But in a new memoir, "American Spy: My Secret History in the CIA, Watergate & Beyond," due out in April, Hunt, 88, writes: "Having Kennedy liquidated, thus elevating himself to the presidency without having to work for it himself, could have been a very tempting and logical move on Johnson's part.

Guns & Butter
Wednesday, January 3, 2006, 1:00pm

"The Ford Presidency"
Interview with Webster Tarpley, author of The Unauthorized Biography of George Bush. The Ford Presidency is analyzed, from Gerald Ford's participation on the Warren Commission; the Watergating of Richard Nixon; Ford's appointment to the Vice Presidency upon Spiro Agnew's resignation; his ascension to the Presidency with Nixon's resignation; the selection of Ford's Vice President; and the stolen 1976 Presidential election.

KPFA 94.1 FM Berkeley 1pm PST, and streaming and archived at www.kpfa.org

www.gunsandbutter.net

OK guys, here's Peter Dale Scott latest, great to have a man like him on our side!

Global Research Feature Article

URL of this article: http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=SCO20061220&articleId=4207

www.GlobalResearch.ca

JFK and 9/11
Insights Gained from Studying Both

by Dr. Peter Dale Scott

Global Research, December 20, 2006
GlobalResearch.ca

The assassination of John F. Kennedy took place 43 years ago on Friday, November 22, 1963 in Dallas, Texas. The following text is the transcript of a lecture delivered by Peter Dale Scott in Dallas on November 18, 2006.

When I first imagined doing this talk I thought well I probably knew more at this stage about 9/11 than most people here, who are professionally concerned with JFK.1 But in preparing this talk, which I only began last Monday, has been a real learning experience for me. Taking a lot of things which I had already knew about each, but which I had never really put together before -- when I did they gave me a clearer view of what was happening behind the scenes in both operations. Because certain things repeat themselves.

...

Much more to follow:

Speaking from a Canadian outsider's perspective, and reflecting on the assassination of JFK and the various anomalies with the official explanation for that crime, I have come to think that perhaps, even if the 9/11 community can prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that the official story for the collapses of the three buildings defies the laws of physics, America simply will not care.

Back, and to the left

Everyone remembers this scene from JFK. The one where Kevin Costner is pointing out that Oswald was behind JFK in the Texas School Book Depository, yet JFKs head snapped back and to the left when it was shot, indicating that the shot came from the front and from the right, or in other words, from the grassy knoll area. Now, I have been to Dallas and I have stood on the grassy knoll, and when I was there, all questions about whether or not Oswald could have plausibly done it alone were removed. It became obvious that at least that shot, the back and to the left shot, could definitely, beyond a shadow of a doubt, not have come from Oswald in the Book Depository.

Now, this physical evidence is much easier to grasp than the complex physics of building collapses like the ones the 9/11 truth community has to deal with.

Peter Dale Scott gave an excellent talk yesterday at the COPA (Coalition on Political Assassinations) Regional Meeting in Dallas, Texas. Scott points out similarities that he has encountered as a researcher studying JFK and 9/11, and covers a wide assortment of anomalies and evidence in this one hour presentation.

Scott talks about Continuity of Government, the a priori existence of "lone nut" profiles to offer cover for covert operations, and how drug trafficking lurks in the background all the while - how "Al Qaeda" is linked to this drug traffic, how it was dismissed by the 9/11 Commission, and the relevance of the case of Sibel Edmonds as well as that of Indira Singh.