14 high quality clips of Pentagon witnesses
14 Clips of witnesses of the Pentagon crash. All broadcasted live on September 11th. Links to the streaming videos at archive.org and high quality copies of the material are included.
These were all taken from the ABC, FOX and NBC material, the channels of which i have downloaded the MPEG's. I skimmed through them up until around 6:00 PM. This has all been very time consuming and i don't have the time now to write descriptions for all the videos. Just view them for yourselves. Please also download the high quality files, just in case that Google decides to pull these.
ABC 9:53 AM
archive.org link
http://www.archive.org/details/abc200109110912-0954 (@ 40 min.)
High quality XVID
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=ZKJIQ1D7
ABC 12:04 PM
archive.org link
http://www.archive.org/details/abc200109111159-1241 (@ 5 min.)
High quality XVID
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=UQBP6BCE
FOX 10:13 AM
Just heard an[other] explosion back over there.
archive.org link
http://www.archive.org/details/fox5200109110954-1036 (@ 19 min.)
High quality XVID
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=LP1ZXOLZ
FOX 10:26 AM
Saw parts of the landing carriage and possibly the engines.
archive.org link
http://www.archive.org/details/fox5200109110954-1036 (@ 32 min.)
High quality XVID
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=X9XM857U
FOX 12:51 PM
archive.org link
http://www.archive.org/details/fox5200109111241-1323 (@ 10 min.)
High quality XVID
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=1FPCWP0H
FOX 2:27 PM
archive.org link
http://www.archive.org/details/fox5200109111404-1446 (@ 23 min.)
High quality XVID
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=DAC7WHHQ
FOX 4:23 PM
archive.org link
http://www.archive.org/details/fox5200109111609-1651 (@ 14 min.)
Hiugh quality XVID
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=EKLO6S7O
FOX 4:39 PM
He brings a piece of the plane to the studio
archive.org link
http://www.archive.org/details/fox5200109111609-1651 (@ 31 min.)
High quality XVID
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=2QHM4YW5
FOX 5:29 PM
archive link
http://www.archive.org/details/fox5200109111651-1733 (@ 38 min.)
High quality XVID
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=9ZF0ZJ9X
NBC 10:16 AM
Saw the plane hit the building.
archive.org link
http://www.archive.org/details/nbc200109110954-1036 (@ 22 min.)
High quality XVID
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=UDJF9G2R
NBC 11:11 AM
Describes a small corporate jet.
archive.org link
http://www.archive.org/details/nbc200109111036-1117 (@ 35 min.)
High quality XVID
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=UX0U6O06
NBC 11:22 AM
for those who have the MPEG's, this is file V08647-18.mpg (@ 6 min.)
It's not available as streaming video on archive.org but fits right between two available parts.
High quality XVID
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=UAV795TP
NBC 11:34 AM
Describes another terrible explosion.
for those who have the MPEG's, this is file V08647-18.mpg (@ 18 min.)
It's not available as streaming video on archive.org but fits right between two available parts.
High quality XVID
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=T7O7VVH8
NBC 6:04 PM
archive.org link
http://www.archive.org/details/nbc200109111733-1814 (@ 31 min.)
High quality XVID
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=SFBQO0K0
- arie's blog
- Login to post comments
Great Job arie...
Your eyes must be going "square" watching all that footage...
Top Respect to you...
I bet the "Citizen Investigation Team" over at ThePentacon.com would be interested in your Pentagon research, especially raw on the street eyewitnesses.
Their Email: CIT@ThePentacon.com
Top job, best wishes
we know Harley Guy had a job in NY
And it looks like he had a few counterparts in DC. "Aziz" with his chunk of plane--HELLO? Removing evidence from a crime scene? What a laugh. Yep, plenty of nominations for best actor in a conspiracy supporting role here!
____
♠
Real Truther a.k.a. Verdadero Verdadero
WTCdemolition.com - Harvard Task Force
Aziz ElHallan, "souvenir plane part guy"
no results in either google or zabasearch. hmm, where is that accent from? what's with his smirk? if i were taking bets on this guy being a member of an intelligence agency, i'd put the odds at 5 to 3.
______________________
"Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And when you look long into an abyss, the abyss also looks into you."Friedrich Nietzsche, Beyond Good and Evil 89 (1886).
http://anti-neocons.com/
You mean ISI?
I'm joking by the way.
And about the removing of plane debris: I've seen testimony that people were touching the "evidence". One guy was even smiling and taking pictures of himself while holding it. Someone [not a cop] screamed at him for it. Some other person had a piece of debris fall onto her car and she took it home with her by accident. So I think you are jumping to conclusions here.
There are probably other people who have this debris as "souvenirs". I would bet on it.
prove it...
and no, ISI is not the intelligence agency that came to mind.
_____________________________________
"Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And when you look long into an abyss, the abyss also looks into you."Friedrich Nietzsche, Beyond Good and Evil 89 (1886).
http://anti-neocons.com/
Here is one of the more suspect witnesses
http://www.gopusa.com/commentary/bobby/2001/bobby_0912.shtml
[begin excerpt]
Riding in a convertable with the top down, I then heard a tremendously loud
noise from behind me and to my left. I looked back and saw a jet airliner
flying very low and very fast. It's amazing what can run through your mind
in just a matter of seconds. As a pilot, I can't help but look at an
airplane and think about airplane topics. What I saw sent a shiver down my
spine as I realized something was not right.
The aircraft was so very low
-- as an aircraft would be on its final approach to an airport. However, if
you have watched any aircraft come in for a landing, even though the
aircraft is descending, it is angled up slightly. This aircraft was angled
downward. In addition, landing gear would also be visible on a aircraft so
low and so near landing. This aircraft had its landing gear retracted.
Finally, an aircraft on final approach is traveling rather slowly. This
aircraft sped by very loudly and very quickly.
[end excerpt]
This is the guy who Jeff Gannon worked for.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeff_Gannon
Good job in putting these together. While we look these over we will continue to call for the release the 80 videos and the NTSB data. Then we will know for sure what happened.
Thanks
I'm doing a major research project on the eye-witness testimony.
I have already assembled the biggest collection of Pentagon eye-witness testimony on the internet.
Do you know of any more sources? This is very useful. Some of this testimony is very detailed and has not been transcribed by anyone.
There are many people who described "raining debris" after the Pentagon attack. In other words the plane hit the building and small pieces of debris from the plane shot in the air in my directions. Many also described debris on the road from the plane. In this video http://www.archive.org/details/fox5200109111609-1651 he shows you a piece of the debris that hit his car.
All of the people who described a small plane were far from the Pentagon. In one of the videos, the witness describes himself as being accross the I-395. This guy is the favorite witness of the "small plane" folks. There are only 4 witnesses who saw a small plane and they were all far away. Put two and two together....
“We're an empire now, and when we act we create our own reality."
Have you watched "Pentacon"
Have you watched "Pentacon" yet, in which four eyewitnesses -- including 2 uniformed Pentagon guards -- are interviewed?
Yes I have watched it
It is possible to track the course of the plane from the testimony. I'm working on that...
For example there are many who described the plane as flying directly over the Navy Annex and near I-395.
This directly contradicts the conclusions and testimony of the Pentacon...
As well... I believe the police officer in that movie said the damaged taxi was in the wrong location... that should negate his testimony completely and throw doubt on the entire film. I'll have to check this fact over again, but I'm pretty sure he made a huge error about this detail. There are many misleading arguments presented in the film as well… If I have time I will do an analysis some time on this film.
Fresh testimony is always more reliable than 5 year after the fact testimony. Everyone who described the altitude of the plane said it was less than 100 feet off the ground. One person said he almost lost his head as the plane crashed into the Pentagon.
If I could make one observation about the eye-witness testimony it is that there are relatively few anomalies. The anomolies are what everyone talks about--at the expense of looking at the overall testimony. The testimony combines to form a large and complete narrative with very specific details. Details are repeated again and again.
For anyone who cares about the Pentagon attack... I highly recommend reading the collections of eye-witness testimony. We don't have videos. This is the next best thing. There are some advantages as well—with video you only have one perspective... with eye-witnesses you have many more. Any the story is extremely compelling when details are repeated over a hundred times. You can form your own conclusions from there if it is “fake” or not.
If the eye-witness testimony was faked, it was done extremely impressively.
“We're an empire now, and when we act we create our own reality."
You haven't researched it enough.
I am Aldo Marquis.
The researcher behind the PentaCon.
Arabesque, a few points just to make you aware...
Those who describe it as coming up 395 are simply wrong, judging from a distance, or lying. We have the flight path corroborated by four different people.
5 years?
Lagasse was telling us about the North side in 2003. Type Lagasse and starboard side and see what you get.
Lagasee remebers the cab being where said it was. Do you have proof he is wrong? How do you know the cab wasn't there and THEN moved up to it's current position.
You need to actually analyze those witness accounts you hold so dear. Some were not even in a position to tell what happened. A lot of these new "witnesses" we're even seeing now are lying or deducing. PERIOD.
Are you calling all four witnesses mistaken?
We can continue this debate further if you'd like. I have plenty research to prove my case.
Tell you what. Post one account that sells your case and I will show you how it does not prove an impact of an AA 757 from the South side of the Citgo.
Then I would like you to explain the "plane/jet" that "chased/shadowed" along the flght path, then "peeled off/veered away" "AS SOON AS" the explosion at the Pentagon happened.
Thanks
Eye-witness
I am researching over 250 eyewitness statements on the Pentagon attack. I have assembled the largest collection available anywhere. I have analyzed about 70% of them completely so far. I am going through every single statement for the most detailed and extensive review of these statements ever made.
It is possible to track the flight path of the plane from some of this testimony--but this is in the preliminary stages. I have been in contact with the Journal of 9/11 studies about publishing my work. A few of my other papers are pending review as we speak.
I promise to look into your video more carefully before I comment further. I have to admit I was very surprised by the testimony that you reported. I don't want to misrepresent your arguments by mistake, so I should watch your video again carefully before I make any more comments.
"Then I would like you to explain the "plane/jet" that "chased/shadowed" along the flght path, then "peeled off/veered away" "AS SOON AS" the explosion at the Pentagon happened."
That would be the C-130. I have many statements that specifically describe this plane in great detail. I also have testimony from the Pilot of this C-130.
Sincerely,
Arabesque.
“We're an empire now, and when we act we create our own reality."