Recent Headlines

Carlyle, Kissinger, SAIC and Halliburton: A 9/11 Convergence
Investigate Waste, Fraud & Abuse at NIST
Rosie O'Donnell is picking up where she left off.
Once Again, The Will of the Voters Is Denied
Uzbek officer says Tashkent bombings falseflag
US Congressman Ed Markey gets a copy of 9/11 Nano Thermite Scientific report
Ex-ISI Chief Says Purpose of New Afghan Intelligence Agency RAMA Is ‘to destabilize Pakistan’
Taboo News and Corporate Media
Peter Phillips Of Project Censored Endorses NYC CAN
Polls show broad skepticism among Americans of official 9/11 narrative
New York Judge Dismisses Claim Negligent Construction Contributed To WTC 7 Collapse
Bombshell: Bin Laden worked for US until 9/11
Drills successful planting bombs in 10 buildings, including DHS offices: GAO
Kevin R. Ryan: Demolition access to the WTC Towers
Naval "National Center for Energetics" Records Of Pre-9/11 Nano-Energetic Materials Development, Nonexistent Or Destroyed
Did the Earth Shake Before The South Tower Hit the Ground?
29 Engineers: Only Explosives Can Explain 9/11 World Trade Center Destruction
David Chandler responds to Frank Greening
“Chief Engineer” Hyman Brown by Patrick Marks
Two Days Before 9/11, Military Exercise Simulated Suicide Hijack Targeting New York
Psychologists Weigh In On 9/11
New York Senator Gillibrand Supports New 9/11 Investigation
Much Of 9/11 Commission's Findings Cite Intelligence Garnered By Torture
AE911Truth in Washington DC July 14th-16th
Daniel Sunjata: Intellectual Dishonesty In The Age Of Universal Deceit...
Vice President Biden receives Thermitic Material paper
Pardon Our Dust, or, Why the World Trade Center Dust Matters
Marie-Paule Pileni (Bentham Open) and nano-technology
Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe

Recent Media

Scans from Hustler 9/11 Coverage

|

9/11 Truth In This Month's Hustler Magazine - yourbbsucks.com

We've put up a local archive of the pages here:
Page 1 - 3MB
Page 2 - 3MB
Page 3 - 2.5MB
Page 4 - 2.5MB
Page 5 - 2.5MB

Single PDF - 1MB (Update: Updated to include page 5)

Update: Added page 5 - continuation of Alex Jones interview.

Thanks to Casseia for the scans, Jon Gold for the heads up, and Ed for the PDF!

Flynt's on our side.

Larry wouldn't have put it in his magazine if he hadn't been thinking the same thing.

Steven Jones is a Fraud, No Wonder he Won't Debate the Science.

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]

The facts speak for themselves

The definition of hypocracy is accusing others of your tactics. This means Republicans going after pedophiles and nameless cowards saying Steven Jones won't debate the facts. We will happily debate the facts but I'm sure you won't.

Steven Jones is a PROVEN FRAUD. He has been Challenged

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]

CB, im not gonna do it, but

CB, im not gonna do it, but somebody is bound to complain about you if you keep spamming threads with your ridiculous attacks on Steven Jones. repetitive and loud as they are. we get it, hes a fraud because he doesnt subscribe to the CGI theory like you. jesus christ man, we get it. really.

Chris, you dont know what you're talking about.

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]

i said we get it already!

like a broken friggin record. im not gonna argue with the insane, but i will ask you one thing. where are Judy Wood and Morgan Reynolds-ex(current?) Bush administration official leading this movement? this should be good.

Again, you're being an idiot by not looking at the EVIDENCE.

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]

hahahaha, thats classic,

hahahaha, thats classic, being called insane by "CB Brooklyn",hahahaha. seek help. either that, or try and make your disinfo a little bit less obvious. Amanda for instance just slips the CGI disinfo in there as opposed to you, who slings insults and uses loud backround colors like a clown. too obvious man. now go ahead, call me a truthling again and tell me to use my brain. because thats a very effective approach and everything.......

okay, so you admit that you're a dunce.

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]

hey CB, stop now, i didnt

hey CB, stop now, i didnt mean for you to lay out your whole CGI theory right now. im a dunce, yep, your right. jesus man, im sorry, just dont go on about CGI right now ok? and call me a truthling and tell me i need a brain again too. again, thats very effective.

okay, you admit you're not capable of applying the

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]

i'll admit anything you want

i'll admit anything you want(true or not) if you would just shut the fuck up already. honestly.

people like you should

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]

actually that was sarcasm

actually that was sarcasm dummy. wanna dig that hole deeper? and im just wondering, but are internet tough guys like you the same in real life? would you tell me to "get the fuck out" if you saw me in person? see you in New York buddy........

so in real life

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]

whos the bully? im trying to

whos the bully? im trying to get you to just shut up and you keep coming at me with insults and CGI ramblings. i havent been in a fist fight since middle school, im no bully, but if you had the guts to tell me to "get the fuck out" to my face like you do on this website i can say i would likely break your nose. the internet makes your balls grow though doesnt it? they shrink up in real life huh? whos angry? your losing it man. so again, i'll see you in New York buddy.........

that's right....

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]

Excuse me, what the fuck are

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]

what better place to commit public murder?

What better place to attack than the idiots like you in yanksville ameriKa?

Can you say "free fall speed"? Stupid

You will not be proven a fraud...

Because you bring forth no supposed facts.

You just hype on the accusations and assumptions.

Pop quiz...

the term "pull it" as was used in the 911 pbs special for what they did to building 7....and building 6...what does it mean?

well according to the secretary of defense’s kinfolk in "popular mechanics" their expert demolition spokesman....has no clue....

that expert refers to a cable being put around an antenna tower and "pull it"...

on another well known 911 debunker sight the "pull it" term stands for "removing the rescue workers from the building before it falls".

So...which one is correct?

Well it really doesn't matter...as long as the feds are not involved......then we will take both of the definition...

you are a joke...

a sad joke....but nonetheless a joke...

People like you are the reasons things like this are able to be "pull it" offed...

You are a fake ameriKan…probably from Israel…

CB = Chomsky BarSatan

I’ve read you posts…you are disinformation…

Your bluff is called…

why are you responding to him?!

He writes a garbage 1 liner and you respond with a paragraph. He again has a 1 liner and another paragraph from you. He's just a jerk and he has successfully sucked you in and now this blog is loaded with garbage. Well done

hello everyone, now i am here

maybe you all through me out of this forum ;-)
but, i have created an account only because this post.

1. @CB
i dont think, it is a good idea, to write, what you write
even if stevens is wrong, he makes good work
and like we all, he cant know all about the hidden technology of military

2. @chris
i dont believe, that CB is 100% right, but it is possible, that "military" or those who have done it has used additional techniqes, unknown to the public at the moment

3.@ all
google "EPWoutofboxBrief.pdf"
or here
http://www.numweb.de/wordpress/?dl=1

maybe there are hints of hidden technology
(artificial gravity may also bring down a building very fast, or in cowork with detonators, accalerates it)

regards from germany
mike

Welcome, Serious Mind--I mean Sir Rious Mind :-)

Must say. not a bad play on words for a native kraut.

As to "hidden tech", reguardless of the truth or falsity of it's existence, all observed effects on 911 can be explained by known technologies, certainly enough to indicte the bastards. ;-)

Impeachment. Accountability. A better world.

thank you

yes, i know, "normal" tech is enough, but i keep this issue in mind.
its like playing chess, better be prepared, even if its not needed

best wishes...

I'm about to do it and I'm not the only one

I'm personally getting sick of CB's spamming. This person never backs up what he/she says and constantly throws out accusations. I've said it before, CB is most likely a government shill. Someone who gets paid big bucks to sit behind a desk and talk s**t on this and other blog sites. We need a moderator to do something about all the spamming and flame wars this person is starting.

CB_Brooklyn Linked to Organized SPAM Syndicate.

Back up what you say, government shill

CB, if you can't start posting links to back up what you say, especially when you're making such statements as "Steven Jones is a proven fraud", then you need to shut the f*** up until you can at LEAST link to ONE website, no matter how cheesy, to back up that outlandish claim.

What a hypocrite...

What a hypocrite...

I just figured out what they

I just figured out what they are doing. They are taking one of our most prominent lines "if you are right, then refute the science" and they are trying to discredit it. Its actually a smart play, by having FAKE/DISINFO agents saying "dispute the science" it will make all newcomers say 'why dispute "THEIR" science when its mostly junk science anyway (because 911truth will be lumped in witth 911disifno)

it's not "their" science, it's "the" science.

[below viewing threshold, show/hide comment]