It wasn't made out of wood.

---

Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? Do we deserve to know how and why 9/11 happened?

*RIMSHOT*

The Eleventh Day of Every Month

... this comparison, based on last summer's midsummer bonfire:

http://juhannuskokko.blogspot.com/2008/06/tali-2008.html

I don't care who y'are, that's funny right there.

Fez up you Morgan I know you really get Wood for Judy? You can't hide your true feelings Jon, your just 'beaming' with love for the woman....?? LOL

It's great to get a laugh from time to time..

Kind regards John

9/11 24/7 UNTIL JUSTICE!!

Some very interesting points about the North Tower clip that I see are, first, at 00:08: an orange glow in the center of the remaining spire. You can see it clearer in the sequence between 00:47 and 00:52. For comparison in the shift in color watch at 1:01 when the camera pans back up to the core. The colors then are predominantly gray in this core section.

Another interesting, but very quick view at 00:33. Debris is blowing out well below the destruction front several floors above it.

The orange glow however is very interesting. A higher rez view of this must show that much clearer.

There is other video evidence which supports the view that the spire 'collapses'. The entire section of spire collapses, shaking loose a shit-load of dust, simulating "dissolving";

In this first video, you can see the momentum of the fall;

In this second video, the fall is as clear as it is likely to get, the entire section collapses downward, quickly, leaving dust in its wake;

"Dustification" has been roundly, and soundly, debunked by Greg Jenkins at the Journal of 9/11 Studies;

http://journalof911studies.com/volume/2007/Fe-DustStudies44.pdf

"Directed energy weapon (DEW) demolition proponents claim that a large majority
of above-grade structural steel from the World Trade Center (WTC) towers was
dissociated into dust and aerosols during and/or after collapse. However, multiple
quantitative dust and aerosol measurements show that no significant fraction of
structural steel was dissociated into dust or aerosols. A review of the photographic
record shows no gas, dust, aerosols, or debris moved upwards during the
collapse, and physical principles reveal that that no significant fraction of structural
steel from the towers could reasonably be supported by air during or immediately
after collapse. Visibility (optical path length) measurements, dust collected directly
from the south tower debris cloud, and an analysis of the physical transport
mechanisms for dust and aerosols prove that the debris which hung in the air after
the collapse was miniscule compared to the amount of steel in the towers. A large
fraction of steel in the towers could not be transformed into a gas due to the reactive
nature of iron and oxygen which would have caused suffocation of anyone in the
vicinity of ground zero."

To date, nobody has scientifically challenged Jenkins paper. Jenkins does concede that observers could think that the spires from a visual interpretation of the videos, but;

"My personal observation, as well as many other witnesses, is
that the spires fell. Other people observe spires spontaneously turning to dust. All
observers are credible and report what they observe. The data is inherently ambiguous
since it may be interpreted in more than one way. This is the definition of ambiguous
data. Usually the demise of the spires is cited as the strongest evidence by DEWdemolition
proponents, but the interpretation is hopelessly ambiguous as can be gauged
by the people who report what they observe."

One YouTube video is no thing to hang a hypothesis upon. It's ambiguous, and shaky ground indeed.

What I find interesting in the second video here are three things...

first...the core is NOT symmetric at the top and has been damaged asymmetrically indicating deeper core damage at the top from "something"...

second...its pretty clear that it was collapsing as a unit, perhaps from the bottom...and not dustifying from the top...its all thinner steel at the top...and all thicker steel at the bottom...energy would have had to go through the top first IF coming from above...

third...the speed and acceleration of this collapse seems a bit slower than the main collapse [?]...I would suggest that this is because it is meeting itself forming its own resistance on the way down...

Love, Peace and Progress...

Robin Hordon

Other videos of 7 don't depict the depth of 7 from north to south like this one, making the collapse seem so much more remarkable.

Heard C. Austin Fitts on Coast to Coast AM recently discussing the reported transfer of important records to the OKC federal building just before its destruction, making one wonder about WTC 7 even more.

Anyone who sees that video and still believes the Official Story is beyond help.

man the times are a CHANGING!

YEAH BABY!~

9/11 24/7 UNTIL JUSTICE!!