Critics Demand Resignation Of U.N. Official Who Wants Probe Of 9/11 "Inside Job" Theories
Source: fauxnews.com
6/19/2008
Critics are calling for the resignation of a U.N. official who publicly supports investigating theories that the Sept. 11 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon were an "inside job."
Richard Falk, the special rapporteur on human rights in the Palestinian territories, investigates alleged Israeli violations of human rights law for the U.N.’s Human Rights Council.
But the former Princeton professor would also like to investigate whether “some sort of controlled explosion from within” destroyed the Twin Towers, he told FOXNews.com.
“I do think there are questions that haven’t been answered, questions about the way the buildings collapsed and the failure to heed a variety of signals that there was danger coming,” Falk said.
“I think [his beliefs are] fruitcake city, but among many delegations to the U.N. it’s probably the conventional wisdom,” said John Bolton, a former U.S. ambassador to the U.N. known for his straight talk on U.N. hypocrisy.
But Hillel Neuer, executive director of U.N. Watch, a non-governmental organization that monitors the U.N., wants Falk removed from his job.
“He should resign,” said Neuer, who raised concerns about Falk's ability to be an objective observer. Neuer has also criticized Falk for being biased against Israel.
“If he were a principled person he would recognize the fact that he has very extreme views,” Neuer said.
In 2004, Falk wrote the forward to “The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11,” a book written by David Ray Griffin, a Sept. 11 conspiracy theorist.
Griffin’s book argues that the Twin Towers may have been brought down by a “controlled demolition” — not by two airliners hijacked by Al Qaeda operatives — and that the Pentagon may not have been hit by a plane at all.
Griffin “doesn’t take a so-called conspiracy view and he raises questions that haven’t been answered,” Falk told FOXNews.com. “I think [the book] deserved to be published and I have no regrets about that.”
Falk said that while he supports alternative theories behind the World Trade Center attack, he doesn't claim the U.S. government was responsible.
“I’m an agnostic on the issue,” he said.
But Bolton is hardly agnostic on the issue of Falk's views.
“It’s just an example of the inmates running the asylum,” Bolton said. “It’s a particularly graphic example for Americans, but this is not an aberration — this is, unfortunately, typical of much of what goes on" at the U.N.
A spokesman for the office of Louise Arbour, the U.N. high commissioner for human rights, declined to comment on Falk.
“As a matter of practice, we do not offer commentaries on individual special rapporteurs,” wrote spokesman Rupert Colville in an e-mail to FOXNews.com. “There are some 27 of them in all, and if we started making character judgments on one or two of them, it would never stop. They are mandated to do their work by the Human Rights Council.”
But Falk’s support for Sept. 11 conspiracy theories isn’t the only thing that has critics up in arms.
In an online article for the Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research last year, Falk — prior to his appointment as an unbiased human rights investigator — compared Israeli actions in Gaza to the Nazi treatment of Jews. This may have led to his appointment as the rapporteur for the Palestinian territories, Bolton said.
“He was picked for a reason, and the reason is not to have an objective assessment — the objective is to find more ammunition to go after Israel,” Bolton said.
Neuer said Falk is not the only special rapporteur to bring a bias to the job. “You have people who are, I would say, a wolf in sheep’s clothing who are implementing the agenda of dictatorships,” he said.
“It’s tragic because there are human rights victims around the world who could greatly benefit from a champion, including in the Middle East. ...
“Many of the rapporteurs do good work, do important work, report on how countries are respecting or not respecting laws around the world,” Neuer said.
Falk maintained he was an appropriate choice for the job. “I think I’m an informed observer and I’m unbiased in the sense that I have always done the best to tell the truth as I see it,” he said.
Despite his calls for Falk’s resignation, Neuer did not expect him to be censured or removed.
“I don’t think there’s going to be any move in the council to do anything about his appointment,” he said.
Asked whether he’d be surprised if further investigations revealed the U.S. government’s role in Sept. 11, Neuer told FOXNews.com, “Yes, I’d be surprised — not shocked but surprised.”
He then reconsidered, and said: “No, I’d be shocked.”
- Jon Gold's blog
- Login to post comments
Anyone know who
"U.N. Watch" really is?
People have claimed they are a pro-conservative-Israeli group, but I don't know.
Aren't you...
Referring to the Bush Administration... or maybe it's Fox News?
Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? Do we deserve to know how and why 9/11 happened?
good question
I know I had checked out their site before but it seems it may be a front or a joke.
The perps are pulling out all the stops. This story and the article about the FBI not being allowed to testify---both are really disturbing. These are examples that need to be shared with the public along with the 911 basics. That way they know and get agry about the efforts to cover it up.
Ugh!!! so frustraiting!
Falk needs to keep
vocal & pull in some people w/ clout that will stand by
him.
Here is a better article
w/more information.
Keep in mind that Falk is Jewish, so they can't dismiss
him out-of-hand.
http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/65405
Did Everyone Miss This?
The most important paragraph in this piece might be this one:
“I think [his beliefs are] fruitcake city, but among many delegations to the U.N. it’s probably the conventional wisdom,” said John Bolton."
Notice: "but among many delegations to the U.N. it’s probably the conventional wisdom"
This is important stuff -- do the UN delegates mostly "get it" about 9/11? This would mean an international investigation via the UN has promise.
That's John Bolton's attempt...
At insulting the delegations of the U.N. because as we all know, it's "blasphemy" and "crazy" to question our elected officials actions concerning the events of 9/11.
Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? Do we deserve to know how and why 9/11 happened?
Don't forget
Bolton hates the UN and wants it destroyed.
They aren't too fond of him either.
And he got his ass turfed out of there. Seems the reasonable people in the UN didn't take him too seriously.
How stupid do they think we are?? Oh never mind.
yup 'U.N Watch' ...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UN_Watch
"UN Watch is affiliated with the American Jewish Committee, being a fully integrated partner. Transfer of full control to the AJC went into effect on January 1, 2001, being jointly controlled together with the World Jewish Congress before that.[3][4]"
Can't talk about these two?
So, we cannot talk about Israel, and we can't talk about 9/11 as being a false flag attack, and we are being chastized by John Bolton, and now 9/11 is being discussed in the UN and in Japan and elsewhere around the world?
Hey gang, are we ever on the right track or what? Lets just keep on truckin because this 9/11 Truth puppy is definitely doing some good hunting!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GW...I think that the UN Watch is the exact "Rovian" arm of the neocons who have put a program together to get the US out of the UN and it started quite a few years ago [mid 90s if I remember] as they began their ramp up to take over this governement before they stole the 2000 election.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Truthers...
See how easy it was to seduce the Ron Paulers right into a cointelpro action without them even knowing it. Libertarians hate the UN and were a ready force to attach themselves to the 9/11TM in the name of 9/11Truth...but really are all about something entirely different...electing Ron Paul. And then add in 8 MILLION DOLLARS in campaign contributions allegedly from the soldiers in Iraq??? Donations that Ron Paul doesn't even understand [but is keeping], and presto...a modern contelpro plan is perfectly executed from the untraceable top on down.
In the end the Ron Paulers have hurt the credibility of the 9/11 Truth Movement as well as the Peace Movements in the eyes of the public because The Ron Paul Experiment is far, far more fringe than either the 9/11 Truth Movement and the Peace Movement ever were.
The damage is done, 9/11 Truth is stil standing, Ron Paul is out of running, so, lets welcome any REAL 9/11 Truthers to keep on working with the 9/11 Truth Movement by asking them to disassociate The Ron Paul Experience from the 9/11 Truth Movement completely. COMPLETELY!
9/11 Truth should be a-political except that it calls for election reforms, and NOT which particular candidate should be elected. 9/11 sensitive candidates will happen by itself down the road as the public becomes more and more informed about their government's malfeasances through our tireless efforts. THE PUBLIC will want change...but its very unlikely that it will have anything to do with Ron Paul in the future.
Any loss of Ron Paulers who were faking support for the 9/11 TM to hijack a growing countrywide organization to foist their candidate onto the public will not be missed. In fact, it will be clearly and addition by subtraction...and the sooner the better. I suggest that you libertarians spend your time building the campaigns of the next Libertarian candidate so that you can have your own movement established for 2012. By that time, 9/11 Truthers will be able to see very clearly exactly what I am explaining, and they will just say NO to another round of organizational hijacking such as what the The Ron Paul Experiment did starting around 05' and 06'. Soon this cointelpro op, and others which are similar, will become very, very obvious to Truthers all around the world.
We Ae Change meetings about 9/11 Truth that break out into Ron Paul organizational meetings simply have to come to an end because their little candidate has signed out...as if Ron Paul has ever been IN the 9/11 Truth Movement in the first place.
Enough is enough, and 9/11 Truth has withstood yet another cointelpro round...as it will the next!
And the We Are Changers really need to take a look at what they are REALLY all about, and go from there.
Robin Hordon
Hordon
Ron Paul is not a COINTELPRO op, you couldn't be more wrong. I suggest you read his book and stop trying to re-write history.
________________________________________
9/18 was an inside job! So maybe 9/11 was too...
Ron Paul is a small guy from Texas
Never said that Ron Paul was a cointelpro...
I state again that The Ron Paul Experiment, including its unknown 8 MILLION dollars to run it IS INDEED a cointelpro op that was easily established well above Ron Paul himself. Its classic cointelpro...
And in order for such cointelpro ops to work, there needs to be a group of "blind followers", which, in this case, there are quite a few million including yourself. Another innocent person whose blindness allows for easy misguidance and "use" for another cause that is unseen because of that very blindness.
I will also state again that I am very glad that the Libertarian perspective is part of the national discourse.
Those supporting The Ron Paul Experiment AND the 9/11 Truth Movement are supporting two contradictory movements at the same time. And to do this there needs to be significant "blindness" in order to fit them both side-by-side in one's head. I think that its called "cognitive dissonance", or something spelled like that.
Ron Paul openly discredits the 9/11 Truth Movement when given the chance on coprorate news. Yet, you, and others pretend and DENY, that this is not the case and that he supports the 9/11 Truth Movement.
This "reality" is why I call upon all Ron Paul believers to leave the 9/11 Truth Movement to more objective and credible folks, and to take your misdirected energies and establish YOUR OWN MOVEMENT so that there is a more competent voice for Libertarians in 2010, 2012 and beyond.
There IS some rewriting of history between us, but its not me that is authoring it!
Again, out of the blue, Ron Paul got funds from the military that nobody ever expected, and then Ron Paul BASHED and DISCREDITED the 9/11 Truth Movement whenever he could on national TV. He unkowingly did his part for the "campaign contributuions", and you and others just do not want to accept this because you are so determined to use anything you can to get Ron Paul elected.
Well, you are now called out and Ron Paul is fully exposed, so please leave the good folks in the 9/11 Truth Movement alone so thay can do thier excellent work without being dragged down by The Ron Paul Experiment.
Robin Hordon
HORDON
You have a complete misunderstanding of why I support Ron Paul's ideals. Perhaps you should visit mises.org so that you can begin to understand the Austrian School of Economics and thus a basic idea of why people supported this man. I supported Ron Paul well before the 9/11 Truth Movement tried to ride the coat tails of the most successful grassroots campaign in history. You think the 9/11 Truth Movement made this man? You're wrong. His 10 terms in Congress and his consistent voting record that illustrates his fight for YOUR freedom in this country is what got him his notoriety.
His association with Alex Jones is why members of the 9/11 Truth Movement supported him in the first place, and he has indeed supported calls for a new investigation, something you neglect to note in your daily tirades against him. In fact, his campaign is an excellent template for how you get a 9/11 Truth candidate elected in the first place: the grassroots.
Calling him a COINTELPRO agent is beyond the pale, and every time you do this you are building another wall between 2 groups that should be working together. Indeed, your divisive comments only serve the PTB by putting people into little collectivist groups thus reducing effectiveness on both sides.
I for one will not accept your incessant bashing of a man who only wants to see you and people like us succeed. He may not agree with us on certain topics, and honestly we all rarely agree on everything, but you are not helping by irrationally accusing him of such associations.
And people wonder why the 9/11 Truth Movement is so splintered and divided. So continue to re-write history to your own liking, but you're only making getting to the truth of 9/11 harder and harder with your divisive comments.
_______________________________________
9/18 was an inside job! So maybe 9/11 was too...
Ron Paul is Ron Paul
Again we deal with cognitive dissonence...I never said Ron Paul is a cointelpro...he has simply been manuevered into being the titular head of a cointelpro action. He has no clue about this, nor do you.
The Ron Paul Experiment and the 9/1 Truth Movement are NOT partners in progress into the future...in any way shape or form. There are no matches in goals.
Please...for goodness sakes, take all of your Ron Paul angst and put it into the next Libertarian whatever movement and get it off the back of the fantastic 9/11 Truth Movement..
This will allow for the solid folks who are working every day at exposing 9/11 TRUTH in respectable and dependable ways to do thier thing without having to navigate around and compensate for the thousands of those Ron Paul fringe types who have taken advantage of the amazing 9/11 Truth Movement to pull Ron Paul into levels of popularity and exposure that Ron Paul would NEVER have achieved on his own.
Why do you think the HI PERPS saw fit to "choose" The Ron Paul Experiment to add their finances to in the first place? For them, its a "two-fer"...whack the 9/11 Truth Movemnet, and whack the Peace Movement because Ron Paul discredits both all in one swipe.
I really do not care about your ideals at all, and I'm glad that you have some ideals and are passionate about them. But, as far as making it harder for the 9/11 Truth Movement to "do their thing", my view is that without Morgan Reynolds, the Ron Paulers who jumped aboard when they had a candidate to foist upon the public in 2005-2006, the "no planers", the video fakery folks, the "concepts in lieu of facts" that Webster Tarpley has been offering for his book sales and speaking engagements...ALONG WITH...the establishment of his 9/11 GOON SQUADS, and the confrontational tendencies of the We Are Change types, the exact opposite is true.
Had ANY of these elements of the 9/11 Truth Movement NOT been engaged within it, we woud be even farther ahead of were we are right now. There is absolutely no doubt about this!
Again, please take your "Ron Paul Anything" off into another movement somewhere. We have some really important work to do that does NOT involve electing a president who truthfully could ONLY be elected for a congressional seat in Texas...at BEST! Please get a grip here.
And once again, Ron Paul is NOT a cointelpro agent, its that he and all his followers have unkowingly been duped into becoming part of an OBVIOUS cointelpro operation that has been amazingly effective at hurting the 9/11 Truth Movement and the Peace Moveents because of its association with them. Very efficient indeed...and for only 8 MILLION BUCKS...cheap enough!
There is NOTHING that Ron Paul or ANY association with him that can contribute POSITIVELY to the 9/11 Truth Movement...as his behavior and statements in public have made abundently clear.
Just get a grip here...and do your Ron Paul thing elsewhere...
Robin Hordon
well...
"Just get a grip here...and do your Ron Paul thing elsewhere..."
I think you should take your own advice here. So far I've only responded to your foolish tirades.
_______________________________________
9/18 was an inside job! So maybe 9/11 was too...
Bolton: Ad Hominem Atttack
John Bolton calls Falk "fruitcake" and "inmates running asylum". Classic ad hominem.
ad hom*i*nem ....adj. Appealing to personal considerations rather than to logic or reason. (American Heritage Collegiate Dict.)
Logic and reason are on Falk's side.
Ad this hominem
Falk you Mr. Bolton, and the horse you rode in on! What a pathetic P.O.S. (Sorry, couldn't resist).
Richard Falk - Media
http://www.radiodujour.com/people/falk_richard
...
Critics are calling for the resignation of a U.N. official who publicly supports investigating theories that the Sept. 11 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon were an "inside job."
This paragraph is a lie because as quoted below, Richard is an "agnostic on the issue" of who was behind the attacks.
"But the former Princeton professor would also like to investigate whether “some sort of controlled explosion from within” destroyed the Twin Towers, he told FOXNews.com."
Is that all he would like to investigate regarding the 9/11 attacks? In the next paragraph he mentions the "failure to heed a variety of signals that there was danger coming", and also says, "I do think there are questions that haven’t been answered." How those buildings came down is NOT the only issue with regards to 9/11.
“I think [his beliefs are] fruitcake city, but among many delegations to the U.N. it’s probably the conventional wisdom,” said John Bolton, a former U.S. ambassador to the U.N. known for his straight talk on U.N. hypocrisy."
Says the "former U.S. ambassador to the U.N." who 36 Senators said was "not truthful", and Bush had to appoint (RealPlayer required) using his "Constitutional Authority" because he could not be confirmed. The man who just LOVED the United Nations. The man who was apart of the PNAC. I really don't value what John Bolton has to say about anything.
"But Hillel Neuer, executive director of U.N. Watch, a non-governmental organization that monitors the U.N., wants Falk removed from his job.
“He should resign,” said Neuer, who raised concerns about Falk's ability to be an objective observer. Neuer has also criticized Falk for being biased against Israel.
“If he were a principled person he would recognize the fact that he has very extreme views,” Neuer said."
Why aren't you allowed to criticize Israel? Prime Minister Olmert is currently in big trouble. They have corrupt elected officials just like we do. They are not above criticism, and to do so does NOT mean you are anti-semitic.
"In 2004, Falk wrote the forward to “The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11,” a book written by David Ray Griffin, a Sept. 11 conspiracy theorist.
Griffin’s book argues that the Twin Towers may have been brought down by a “controlled demolition” — not by two airliners hijacked by Al Qaeda operatives — and that the Pentagon may not have been hit by a plane at all.
Griffin “doesn’t take a so-called conspiracy view and he raises questions that haven’t been answered,” Falk told FOXNews.com. “I think [the book] deserved to be published and I have no regrets about that.”
Dr. Griffin's book talked about a lot more than that. Richard Falk's description of Dr. Griffin is not accurate as far as having the "conspiracy view," but his latest book does exactly as Richard describes.
"Falk said that while he supports alternative theories behind the World Trade Center attack, he doesn't claim the U.S. government was responsible.
“I’m an agnostic on the issue,” he said."
See above.
"But Bolton is hardly agnostic on the issue of Falk's views.
“It’s just an example of the inmates running the asylum,” Bolton said. “It’s a particularly graphic example for Americans, but this is not an aberration — this is, unfortunately, typical of much of what goes on" at the U.N."
See Above.
A spokesman for the office of Louise Arbour, the U.N. high commissioner for human rights, declined to comment on Falk.
“As a matter of practice, we do not offer commentaries on individual special rapporteurs,” wrote spokesman Rupert Colville in an e-mail to FOXNews.com. “There are some 27 of them in all, and if we started making character judgments on one or two of them, it would never stop. They are mandated to do their work by the Human Rights Council.”
Good. Especially with regard to "Faux News." They're not looking for news, they're looking to slander Falk.
But Falk’s support for Sept. 11 conspiracy theories isn’t the only thing that has critics up in arms.
In an online article for the Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research last year, Falk — prior to his appointment as an unbiased human rights investigator — compared Israeli actions in Gaza to the Nazi treatment of Jews. This may have led to his appointment as the rapporteur for the Palestinian territories, Bolton said.
“He was picked for a reason, and the reason is not to have an objective assessment — the objective is to find more ammunition to go after Israel,” Bolton said.
See Above regarding Bolton and Israel.
Neuer said Falk is not the only special rapporteur to bring a bias to the job. “You have people who are, I would say, a wolf in sheep’s clothing who are implementing the agenda of dictatorships,” he said.
“It’s tragic because there are human rights victims around the world who could greatly benefit from a champion, including in the Middle East. ...
Which dictatorship's agenda is Richard Falk implementing? Why is a dictatorship allowed in the White House?
“Many of the rapporteurs do good work, do important work, report on how countries are respecting or not respecting laws around the world,” Neuer said.
Falk maintained he was an appropriate choice for the job. “I think I’m an informed observer and I’m unbiased in the sense that I have always done the best to tell the truth as I see it,” he said.
Despite his calls for Falk’s resignation, Neuer did not expect him to be censured or removed.
“I don’t think there’s going to be any move in the council to do anything about his appointment,” he said.
Good. Let him do his job.
Asked whether he’d be surprised if further investigations revealed the U.S. government’s role in Sept. 11, Neuer told FOXNews.com, “Yes, I’d be surprised — not shocked but surprised.”
He then reconsidered, and said: “No, I’d be shocked.”
The idea is shocking isn't it? That's why we need to find out exactly what happened, and hold those responsible, accountable to the FULL extent of the law.
Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? Do we deserve to know how and why 9/11 happened?
Classic attack
"Griffin's book argues that the Twin Towers may have been brought down by a "controlled demolition" — not by two airliners hijacked by Al Qaeda operatives — and that the Pentagon may not have been hit by a plane at all."
How many times have we read this sentence? It implies that CD theories are also "no plane" theories, and it throws in the favorite subject of debunkers: no plane at the Pentagon.
John Bolton ... No Big Surprise
And I suspect that our foes will always use derogatory language to address us because this provides them with a means of avoiding the debates they will always lose.
They always have...
Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? Do we deserve to know how and why 9/11 happened?
We Are "Crazy", Therefore Unworthy Of Debate
It's a very effective approach used widely.
That's why...
The media makes sure to avoid covering things the families do, and say with regard to questioning the official account of 9/11. That's why they make SURE to focus on our theories instead of our facts. Very hard to portray these things as "crazy." That's also why they LOVE to get the people of this movement that come across as "crazy" on the TV because it makes their jobs a lot easier. You will never see someone like Paul Thompson, Lorie Van Auken, Kyle Hence, etc... splashed across the TV sets of America during prime time talking in depth about this issue. Live and unedited.
I DARE Keith Olbermann to pick one of those three for a massive segment on his show.
Speaking of the families, this was forwarded to me yesterday by one of them.
http://www.911independentcommission.org/apr012004.html
Because I sent them this...
http://visibility911.com/jongold/?p=433
Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? Do we deserve to know how and why 9/11 happened?
Fax Keith Olbermann and dare him...
...or call his office:
Fax: 212-413-5189
Tel: 212-664-4444
"Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. Whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government." -The Declaration of Independence
Done.
Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? Do we deserve to know how and why 9/11 happened?
Everything I have...
On John Bolton. Fruitcake...
John Bolton: Chalk up another "yes-man"......
Time for Bolton to go
Former U.S. Ambassador Speaks Out Against Bolton
Scrapping Global Treaties
Staying What Course?
PNAC 101 - Rise Of The Neocons
Consider The Source
Goodbye To Intelligence
Cheney Says Confident Of Bolton UN Confirmation
Bush Hints He Will Withhold Other Papers On Bolton
Bush's Political Capital Spent, Voices in Both Parties Suggest
Bolton Said To Orchestrate Unlawful Firing
Key Democrat Says Likely Can't Block Bolton
The Downing Street Memo Story Won't Die
Bolton Approval By 'Tiniest' Margin - Senator
U.S. Threatens To Withhold Funds From U.N. Unless It Reforms
Reid: No Documents, No Bolton
Bush Blasts Democrats For 'Agenda Of Road Block'
Congressman Conyers Hammers The Washington Post's Dana Milbank
Russia, China Join Against U.S. "Star Wars"
To Kill Iraq
Democrat Block Attempt To Confirm Bolton - Bush May Install Him Anyway
Karl Rove Q & A On Hardball - Downing Street Memo
Americans Inching Closer To A Reckoning
State Dept. Now Says Bolton Interviewed
Officials: Bush May Appoint Bolton Next Week
Iran Is Judged 10 Years From Nuclear Bomb - White House Lied Again
Bolton's First Day: "I'm Warning You Syria And Iran"
No Proof Found Of Iran Arms Program
U.S. Wants Changes In U.N. Agreement
Bolton Wants '11th Hour' Changes To UN Reform Plan
Two Bush 2000 Florida recount aides were rewarded with top FEMA posts
World Summit On U.N.'s Future Heads For Chaos
John Bolton Visited Judith Miller In Prison
Judith Miller Has Been Released
John Bolton Draws Boos And Hisses At Yale University
John Bolton Blocks U.N. Briefing On Atrocities In Sudan
The Miller Case: From A Name On A Pad To Jail, And Back - New York Times "Tell-All"
Cheney Aide, John Hannah, Cooperating With CIA Outing Probe, Sources Say
Second Cheney Aide, David Wurmser, Cooperating In Leak Probe
Leak Case Renews Questions On War's Rationale
Cheney Aide Wurmser Passed Plame's Name To Libby, Hadley
Bush Administration As Dangerous Now As Before
Bolton's Chief Of Staff Gave Information On Outed Agent To Libby
John Bolton Threatens To Withdraw The U.S. From The United Nations
In Lawsuit, Team Bush Swore Saddam Was Behind 9/11
U.N. Faces New Political Threats From U.S.
Bolton Loses British Backing For U.N. Tactics
U.S. Stands Alone In U.N. Budget Demand
UN General Assembly Demands Israel Fully Withdraw From Syrian Golan
Annan And Bolton Clash Over Rights Critique
How The President Got A Life
Author Of Torture Memo Defends Memo
J. Edgar Hoover With Supercomputers
The Empty Shirts, Courtiers, And 'Crazies'
Bolton Launches Talks On Replacing Annan
John Bolton Says India, Pakistan Got Atomic Arms "Legitimately"
U.S. Seeks Deadline In Dispute With Iran
John Bolton Threatens Iran With "Tangible And Painful Consequences"
Bolton Threatens Military Action Against Iran's Nuclear Programme If Diplomacy Fails
Iran Promises Harsh Response To Foreign Attack
U.N. Staff Vote No Confidence In Annan Management
Security Council Considers Iran Proposals
Iran Threatens To Use Oil In Case Of Nuke Standoff
John Bolton: The Iranian Threat Is The Equivalent Of A Nuclear 9/11
New Harvard Study Talks About Links Between Israel And The Bush Administration
Pro-Israel Lobby In U.S. Under Attack
US & Allies Seek a Way Outside UN to Press Iran
In The Shadow Of Israel
Bush Clears the Way for Corporate Domination
John Bolton Asked By Dennis Kucinich About Ops In Iran; Bolton Denies Knowledge
The 9/11 Truth Movement Is Not Anti-Semitic And Neither Is Ray McGovern
Iran Threatens To Pull Out Of Nuke Treaty
Russia Says UN Plan For Iran Is "First Step To War"
Hijacked Truth?
John Bolton Described As, "Secret Member Of Israel's Own Team At The United Nations"
Iran Welcomes Talks, Rebuffs U.S. Terms
John Bolton Tells Iran To "Put Up Or Shut Up" - Video Inside
Vanity Fair Confirms Niger Forgeries Tied To White House
U.S. Refuses To Rule Out Attacks On Iran
Will The White House Moron Bring On Armageddon?
China Warns North Korea Not To Fire Missile
Security Council Votes For N. Korea Sanctions, N. Korea Vowed To Continue M. Launches
U.S., Israel Push World To Brink Of World War
"Lebanon Crisis An International Conspiracy"
Bush Stands With Israel As Rice Makes Plans For Mideast Mission
Overruling Democracy
Armageddon On The Horizon?
Possible Resolution Between Lebanon/Israel Crisis, John Bolton A Pessimist
U.S. Made An Offer Iran Can Only Refuse
Iran President Challenges Bush To Debate
IAEA: Iran Violating Security Council Order
U.S.: Iran Moving To Dangerously Perfect Uranium Conversion
How Bush Rules: How Republicans Are Hyping Fear To Keep One-Party Rule
Washington Times: Israel Planning Nuclear Strikes Against Iran
The United States And The International Criminal Court
U.S. Intelligence Statement: N. Korea Radioactivity Detected
U.S. Blocks U.N. Resolution Condemning Israel
Our New Friends In The Middle East
Seymour Hersh Reports That Cheney Is Pushing For War With Iran
Bush Accepts Bolton's U.N. Resignation
The Surreal Politics Of Premeditated War
John Bolton: "U.S. Has No Strategic Interest In United Iraq"
Gates: The U.S. Army Should Prepare For A War Against Russia
Americans Have Lost Their Country
Decline And Fall Of The Neocons
Rowan Scarborough Says Ray McGovern & Co. Are Sabotaging War On Terror - Video Inside
A Mission of Mystery
The Fallout From An Attack On Iran Would Be Devastating
Cheney Hand Seen Behind Leaks Of "Misleading" Stories About Syrian Nuclear Weapons
U.S., Israel Refuse To Cooperate With Inquest Into Syria Strike
Bolton Calls For Witch-Hunt Into Anti-Bush "People In The Intelligence Community"
Project Update
Monbiot Fails To "Arrest" Bolton
Bush Replays Iraq Games On Iran
Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? Do we deserve to know how and why 9/11 happened?
impressive salvo for truth, Jon!
Jon,
It's a pretty impressive salvo for truth, Jon!
I see, you've researched Mr. Bolton--a little! Bolton is terrible, and seems, definitely, close to the center of the Neocon power base.
Ad hominem attacks work well for them and is their first choice. It's also safe, they don't need to know anything! Bolton subscribes, obviously, to this debate-avoiding technique.
It's amazes me when it gets to the point that black is white and down is up! It's clear, Israel is hammering the Palestinians with little remorse. It's pretty clear the Twin Towers and Bldg 7, didn't collapse due to fire!
Bolton
...don't believe him!
Thanks...
John Bolton, and the rest of them should be at the Hague. That includes anyone that allowed these things to happen with absolutely no accountability as far as I'm concerned.
That "system" was made for a reason. Checks and balances.
Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? Do we deserve to know how and why 9/11 happened?