Aldo, how are you reviewing a movie you've never seen?

I'm not supporting anything at the Pentagon. I'm presenting both sides and letting people make up their own mind.

And don't try and play coy about Lloyd. If you're not so sure about Lloyd, how come you said the following in the TruthNetRadio chat:

Aldo Marquis CIT 11:54 PM: I ALMOST ASK MYSELF
Aldo Marquis CIT 11:54 PM: WHAT AM I DOING THIS FOR
Aldo Marquis CIT 11:54 PM: I CAN SAY I'VE SPOKEN DIRECTLY TO OPERATIVES FROM THE PENTAGON ATTACK
Aldo Marquis CIT 11:55 PM: I HAVE LOOKED THE DEVIL IN THE EYE
Aldo Marquis CIT 11:55 PM: AND THE FACT THAT PEOPLE AREN'T RESEARCHED ENOUGH TO KNOW WHAT WE HAVE GIVEN THEM IS FRUSTRATING TO SAY THE LEAST

To you guys, everyone is an agent, and everything is planted. Add to that your tirades on this website and others, and you wonder why nobody takes you seriously.

Craig, don't play dumb. Anyone who's watched your behavior on our forum knows exactly where you stand.

"The generator damage? It was faked! The light poles? They were faked! These eyewitnesses? They're lying or agents! Bla bla bla..."

Aldo's tirade in the TNR pretty much seals the deal. You think Lloyd England is a government operative, "THE DEVIL" as Aldo put it.

I have a limited amount of screen time to work with, and the last thing I'm going to waste time on is accusing Lloyd and McGraw of being "in on it" just because you and Aldo demand it.

Let me make my film, and I'll let you make yours. You sure can dish it out, but you can't take it yourself.

Nowhere in your quote from the private chatroom is Aldo directly referring to Lloyd England.

We have spoken with more than one individual who has been caught in numerous lies and is implicated by the evidence has having been involved.

In fact you and I both had dinner with one.

If "demon" isn't a fitting description for someone willingly involved what is?

Are you suggesting that nobody was involved?

But we have NEVER said that "everyone" is a plant and as I said most of the witnesses we have spoken with and presented are 100% genuine. You know this so you are lying about our position when you suggest that we claim that all the witnesses are liars.

For years you have been telling literally millions of people that a Boeing did not hit the Pentagon which means that at least some of the physical damage would have been staged.

An A3-sky warrior could not have downed the poles.

If you have completely changed your position and now believe that a 757 hit the building in light of the incredible evidence that has been discovered showing otherwise that is certainly your right but to condemn others in the movement for accepting the evidence seems rather hypocritical of you.

Especially since you still sell 2nd edition to this day.

You do not have to accuse anyone of being "in on it" and we did no such thing either.

But if you are going to present the evidence you most certainly ARE expected to NOT edit out the most relevant and dubious details while creating an animation to depict something completely different from what the witness reports.

That is deceptive.

Having "limited screen time" does not mean you have to be deceptive with the evidence.

I looked many other people in the eye ,Dylan.

But the fact remains the plane was on the north side and didn't hit any poles. Why are you protecting Lloyd?

>>>>"The generator damage? It was faked! The light poles? They were faked! These eyewitnesses? They're lying or agents! Bla bla bla..."

What a lazy, generalized statement. Did you forget the part where we actually provide evidence to back it up?

Did you ever measure the wing/engine against the generator trailer Dylan? Of course you didn't.

Did you ever measure the wing span of a 757 approaching from the north side of the Citgo in relation to the downed light poles? Of course you didn't.

We have Dylan.

If you bothered to listen to us and PFT your Pentagon section would have had much more impact AND truth to it.

Dear Dylan,

I commend you for all your effeorts, regarding Barry Jennings , may I ask why the material was NOT included?

Will we EVER KNOW what really happened at WTC 7 early in the morning?

Where there explosions going off early in the morning even before or just after before the plane strikes?

I do hope we can get to the bottom of this.

Frankly, WTC7 is the key, the most obvious anamoly in the whole operation.

I do hope LC FC will cover this, if not some other documentary in the near future will light the spark focusing on WTC 7 and all its anamolies.

This one thing alone can tear the fabric of lies spun by the MSM once and for all.

Any way, your work is done, now it is up to us to support you and start the firestorm of activisim to renew calls for a NEW INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION even of those COMPLICIT IN COVER UPs.

LC FC is a RENEWED CALL FOR ACTIVISM.

I hope all of us ANSWER THAT CALL.

We pray and we hope.

Don't forget the death toll is ACTUALLY in the tens of thousands once we factor in the betrayed and neglected 1st responders.

We may be their last chance for justice and restitution.

2008 is a critical year. Presidential elections, National ID card and war / wars with Iran-Syria-Shiite Iraq.

Maybe even Russia-China.

And by the way, according to antiwar.com Blackwater is "leaving Iraq"

http://www.gulf-news.com/region/Iraq/10161929.html

Some of them may be coming back "HOME" to roost.

Those 200 over FEMA "CAMPS" have to be manned by someone right?

It is make or break.

They are going to try again.

It is up to us.

What did Mel Gibson say in Braveheart- "Every man dies one day, not every man has lived."

It is up to us.

Scores killed in US Iraq raid: Women and children among victims of air strike targeting "criminals" in Sadr City

http://www.uruknet.info/?p=m37424&hd=&size=1&l=e

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at

Barry was dropped from the Final Cut because, despite our requests from the public, people started calling him at his job and harassing him.

If he is being harrassed about his interview, giving him a full public profile would be helpful I would think. It would provide some cover for him. Did he insist on not being included or did you? This seems like a very important piece of evidence to really drive home the purposeful demoliton of Bld. 7.

I just hate to see people cave in to pressure. I hate to see the neocons getting what they want, which was "no Charlie Sheen" and no "theater release." Now they won't vicioulsy attack the film and create more publicity, they'll try to ignore it. We must all do our part now to promote it!

Look, the Loose Change guys have already made the most amazing 9/11 film (although Zeitgeist seems to charging into the top tier).

They can always add the Barry Jennings stuff back in later if something can work out.

What's more important is that a significant number of independent theatres around the nation play it.

Then 9/11 Truth Activists (& Ron Paulites) can hand out DVDs and people will be lined up blockes to see the film.

Then, just maybe, the revolution will start.

Would hate to see that get lost.

For your next post would you just make your points succinctly without all those sour grapes? I can tell you are upset but it is hard to see through all your rage and figure out what are your main issues.

I know this is useless but do you know how much film they had to edit to get a 2 hour movie? And you're complaining there's not enough of you and your friends in it?
Why are you telling someone else (especially makers of the biggest internet movie of all time) how they should make their movie? YOU make your Pentagon movie and do it exactly how you feel it should be done.
Criticism is always accepted, but when you start telling the film maker that YOUR parts should of been included and DEMAND them to appear in the movie or else you'll reject the entire product, you seem more like a disgruntled B-movie actor than a sincere critic.

Not about a "movie" or ego or anybody being in a film.

Dylan made a conscious decision about how to present the Pentagon attack regardless of the evidence.

Love it or hate it LC has impact on people's beliefs.

Accuracy and honesty is important in the name of truth and justice.

Our concern is for the future of this nation and the innocent people dying every day in this fraudulent war on terror.

That is why we may seem passionate and/or upset at times.

We have uncovered literal PROOF of a military deception.

We're not done yet either.

We don't beat around the bush, sugarcoat, or kiss ass for "movement politics".

You get nothing but the cold hard truth from CIT regardless of how difficult it is to accept.

I think we've spoken our mind here in regards to LC enough but we will not stop when it comes to exposing the perpetrators of 9/11.

The time for "asking questions" is over.

We do not need a new investigation into "if" 9/11 was an inside job or exactly what happened on 9/11.

We need an investigation into WHO the perpetrators really are.

The work of CIT is going to help us skip right up to that.

all i'm saying is your attack on LC isn't good for the movement.
I'm with you on everything you said but you gotta realize you can't make everyone happy. I'm sure there will be some things I object about the movie as well. There always will be.
Many people don't think the Pentagon is the most essential key to understanding 9/11. Many do.
I suggest you make a movie focusing only on the Pentagon. Perhaps work with Dylan to get some footage he didn't use instead of yelling at him.
Just my opinion...

We know a lot of people don't want to hear anything bad about LC.

But when it comes to the evidence we simply can't hold our tongues.

Dylan already gave us the footage we were part of and we have already released shorts depicting the critical information that he has edited out.

But naturally his movie will be seen by many more people and we simply won't be able to stay quiet about the evidence for the sake of accuracy, truth, and justice.

We do plan on releasing a comprehensive documentary focusing on the Pentagon early 2008 and with the additional information we have obtained and are obtaining in our continued investigation....we are quite certain that it will get significant attention.

Please don't take our frustration the wrong way.

It's all for the right reasons.

Peace!

This was about his Pentagon section. This is about the evidence obtained regarding the Pentagon attack. This was not about us.

He misrepresented the information in his film.

Stop for a minute and think about it.

Movies don't save countries.