Finally the Pentagon Speculation Comes to an End!
Hello all,
It has been a very long time since I have posted at 911Blogger, and it was this issue among others that were central to me losing interest in 911 Truth activism.
I simply don't want to be associated with people who put feelings before facts or ego investment before the scientific method.
I am hoping that the great work done here by David Chandler supported primarily by Ken Jenkins may finally start an ending to the speculation surrounding the crash of Flight 77 into the Pentagon.
In absolute support of this rational position presented by David Chandler, is the witness testimony collated in the this video by Ken Jenkins.
See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9cafvDip3ts
I would be disappointed if this material is not enough to convince activists that saying that "no plane hit the Pentagon" is not supported by the hard evidence at hand.
There are many people who have worked to get this material to this standard; but in my view Frank Legge has been the one that has dedicated the most effort to co-ordinate a rational overview of the Pentagon evidence. Frank is not well and may well lose his fight with cancer very soon. I sincerely thank him for spending so much time fighting for our movements credibility, while suffering great illness and having to deal with endless attacks against him for his rational stance on the Pentagon. Frank is a true hero of humanity and of science, he also makes me very proud to be an Australian.
Kind regards John
- John Bursill's blog
- Login to post comments
Kevin Ryan's Analysis...
Two dozen questions about Flight 77 and the Pentagon that might lead to justice
Listen...
I liked the video when I saw it a few days ago. I think that it remarkably disseminates easily viewed information in a simple format from which most people can gain insight.
This video also underscores that it becomes important to "get the word out" in an easily digestible format.
Here is my beef.
It is not about "planes" vs "no planes", nor "Let it happen on Purpose" vs. "Made it happen on Purpose", nor "This 9/11 View" vs "That 9/11 View".
I keep hearing a bunch of noise that this kind of contention is tearing apart the 9/11 Truth Movement.
ha! No way. This kind of contention is NOT tearing apart the 9/11 Truth Movement.
What is tearing apart the 9/11 Truth Movement is the lack of willingness for people to get out there and disseminate, to get the word out about 9/11. To hit the streets. To be visible. To interact.
Activism is lacking.
On the street interaction is lacking.
Group events targeting NEW people is lacking.
Individuals taking action to get the word out in their communities is lacking.
This lack of action is what is "tearing apart the 9/11 Truth Movement".
EXAMPLE
In our "North Texans for 9/11 Truth Group", we have many members with a vast array of perspectives.
So what if there are individual differences in perspectives? It is still America, right?
"North Texans for 9/11 Truth" has a mission to get the word out about 9/11. To reach new people about the 9/11 Cover-up.
Primarily we utilize the resources of Ae911Truth in order to accomplish this. Ae911Truth is by far the best entry point to the subject of 9/11 for a newly exposed person. "9/11 Truth 101".
Every member (despite their other viewpoints about the topic) is in agreement that this is the best tool for reaching new people.
So, that is the simplicity of our group's mission. Actions to reach new people about the 9/11 Cover-up.
(On the rare occasion where one member causes repeated disruptions or embroilment, they are "uninvited to be a member".)
My point here again.
A mainstay of the 9/11 Truth Movement is to reach new people. It takes action.
ANYBODY can do something. Place an ad in a paper. Distribute Ae911Truth brochures and DVDs. Put out signs. Mail packets. Write a Letter to the Editor. Email a Professor or Architect. Etc., etc.
These folks who spend endless hours on message boards or just hover at home on their computer or just gripe about it all, but don't ACTIVELY get the word out to new people are part of the problem.
A lot of people know about 9/11 Truth. But we don't have a "Movement" unless 9/11 Truthers "move".
And there are sane ways to reach new people with the 9/11 Cover-up. So, this guy that uses wild contentious theories with which to approach a new person is not really on the mission to reach a new person.
~~~~
SIDENOTE:
In order to help with the timely "FireFighters for 9/11 Truth" and "Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth" CAMPAIGN, our group is doing what we can on a local level.
"North Texans for 9/11 Truth" is putting together 100 packets...a nice, professional packet (envelope) filled with DVDs, the "Beyond Misinformation" magazine, brochures, etc. for local Fire Stations. We will mail and/or deliver these packets to local Firehouses.
The packets will contain many more DVDs and brochures than what is pictured below in the photo.
Final Versions to come...very soon!
Hello all,
These two videos are not in there final versions and are to be improved before "official release".
Possibly it is preferable to remove this blog at this time, until Ken, David and the team that has developed this research are completely happy with these presentations.
As I did not check with Ken before posting this to my blog, I apologise, as I have become aware he would rather I had not at this time.
Kind regards John
Helpful
This effectively proves that a large plane struck the Pentagon. I don't know how many people actually endorse "flyover", but this type of speculation needs to be put to bed so that the Pentagon can be used fully and effectively by the 911TM. (What's left of it, as TomT eloquently stated).
*Nothing should have hit the Pentagon during a time of attack nearly an hour after the first tower was struck.
*It's highly improbable, if not impossible, that a Muslim pilot was flying the plane -- suggesting the plane was under remote control. Which means an inside job.
*The location of the attack is highly suspicious and also suggests that this was a false flag.
*The scientific evidence at the WTC indicates an inside job, and the Pentagon attack was part of the same operation.
It's still baffling to me how intact passenger bodies survived the impact to be autopsied, assuming this was AA77. Except for the alleged hijackers. What's the evidence for Muslims even being on board?
FINAL - For distribution
Description
"Two complementary videos are combined here in the order that they were presented at the 9/11 Truth Film Festival in Oakland, CA, on Sept 10, 2015.
The first video is a preview of the witness section of a forthcoming film by Ken Jenkins titled The Pentagon Plane Puzzle.
That is followed by a PowerPoint presentation by David Chandler titled Going Beyond Speculation – A Scientific Look at the Pentagon Evidence.
In post-production, Ken Jenkins of 9/11 TV added many additional graphics to the live video footage of Chandler’s presentation.
David Chandler's presentation starts at 26:40."