The Results Are In: Overwhelming Majority of AIA Delegates Make the Political Decision and Vote Down Resolution 15-6

ae911truth Sat, 05/16/2015 - 5:57pm

“We are a professional – not a political – organization. But in this case, if we vote “no” on this resolution, we are making a political decision, not a professional one. Thank you very much.” – Daniel Barnum, FAIA, AE911Truth Board of Directors

...The vote came after a number of impassioned statements from supporters and opponents. It was evident that those who opposed the resolution did not fully understand the official explanation of WTC 7’s destruction for which they claimed such adamant support. One architect from New York stated that diesel fuel fires were responsible for WTC 7’s destruction, an explanation that even NIST itself has disavowed.

Simpler than you think

“It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.”
― Upton Sinclair

7man on Sun, 05/17/2015 - 12:47pm.

Login to post comments
2 votes

AIA Resolution

I was saddened by the vote at the AIA convention. If we do not hold accountable the perpetrators of this attack on The WTC, then, no building in the World is safe.
The Architects that voted against this resolution should not be designing buildings especially large steel framed buildings as this vote does not question the NIST report and in so doing accepts the conclusion that fire brought these buildings down, not once but three times on 911...As We know, never before had a steel framed building collapsed due to fire. The AIA vote defies the basic laws of Physics and the research by reputable engineers, architects and scientists whom have jeopardized their careers and lives by questioning the NIST report.
I sincerely appreciate the effort by Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth who put this resolution to the AIA and in so doing brought an important issue back into the limelight. I also am thankful that 4% of the AIA members in attendance voted for the Resolution. 250 members of the AIA also signed the petition for a new investigation.
Murder has no statute of limitations and because of the many 911 researchers and journalists, We have a good idea who was involved in the planning, implementation and coverup of this complex false flag attack.
They will be held accountable and must live every day knowing that the plot they were involved in.. caused and continues to cause so much misery to others. they cannot escape and must live with this 'faustian bargain' as long as they live.

SunDog on Mon, 05/18/2015 - 6:59pm.

Login to post comments
5 votes

Science and Reason Takes Back Seat to 9/11 Official Story In His

Science and Reason Takes Back Seat to 9/11 Official Story In Historic AIA Resolution Vote

http://www.activistpost.com/2015/05/science-and-reason-takes-back-seat-to.html

By Bernie Suarez

In a historic vote delegates of the American Institute of Architects (AIA) overwhelmingly voted down Resolution 15-6 which called for AIA to support a new investigation of the destruction of World Trade Center building 7 on September 11th 2001. The resolution, which was introduced by AIA member Dan Barnum FAIA, was voted down overwhelmingly by a vote of 3892 - 160 meaning 96% of the delegates voted to ignore the science, the facts, and the evidence which is today common knowledge about the destruction of WTC 7!

That's right. 96% of voting AIA delegates voted with intentions and goals outside the realm of science and reason. Could it be that to 96% of AIA delegates two planes CAN symmetrically destroy three massive towers at freefall speed through the path of most resistance? Can it be that to 96% of AIA voting delegates a 47-story state-of-the-art tower CAN disintegrate at freefall speed due to ordinary office fires? If this was really the case, would you trust these people to build the apartment building you live in or office building you work at?

The question all truth seekers and lovers of critical thinking, science and reason should be asking then is, why the overwhelming vote? As resolution introducer Dan Barnum explained afterwards:

We are a professional – not a political – organization. But in this case, if we vote “no” on this resolution, we are making a political decision, not a professional one. Thank you very much.

And Dan Barnum is quite correct here in that clearly these delegates are not voting with science and reason in mind, but with political interest instead. Perhaps they were afraid of the consequences of voting for the resolution. Very likely many of them had no understanding of the nature of the WTC collapse even as admitted by NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technologies). Many of them were propagandized by voices repeating WTC destruction theories including theories that even NIST has disavowed like the diesel fuel theories.

more:
http://www.activistpost.com/2015/05/science-and-reason-takes-back-seat-to.html

Joe on Mon, 05/18/2015 - 7:24pm.