The Toronto Hearings on 9/11: Uncovering Ten Years of Deception -- Trailer

FYI! Here's the trailer for the new comprehensive DVD covering the Toronto Hearings on 9/11 from this past September, which brought together expert witnesses to present evidence contrary to the official story to a distinguished panel, who will draft a report based on the evidence submitted.

Trailer:
http://youtu.be/1rSJZqMwNoY
Preview:
http://youtu.be/RbVQvteP0rQ

Pre-order your DVD here:
http://pressfortruth.ca/dvd_dtls.php?rid=11
Spread far and wide!

Description

The Toronto Hearings on 9/11: Uncovering Ten Years of Deception

Ten years have passed since the World Trade Center attacks of September 11, 2001, and there are still many unanswered questions surrounding that fateful day.

In 2011, experts and scientists from around the world gathered in Toronto, Canada to present new and established evidence that questions the official story of 9/11. This evidence was presented to a distinguished panel of experts over a 4 day period.

Through their analysis and scientific investigations, they hope to spark a new investigation into the attacks of September 11, 2001.

Press For Truth and The International Center for 9/11 Studies Present:

"The Toronto Hearings on 9/11: Uncovering Ten Years of Deception"

Produced by:
Steven Davies
Dan Dicks
Bryan Law

An over 5 hour DVD, with comprehensive coverage of the 4 day Toronto Hearings from September 2011.

Featuring expert witness testimony from:

David Ray Griffin
Richard Gage
David Chandler
Kevin Ryan
Niels Harrit
Barbara Honegger
Peter Dale Scott
Graeme MacQueen
Jonathan Cole
Cynthia McKinney
...and many more!

Coming April 9 2012

Show "What?" by jimd3100

Why is the title Press For Truth being used?

Were the film makers contacted before using the same name as one of the most important 9/11 Truth documentaries around? Is there a copyright issue here? Press For Truth is an incredible film and it would be quite offensive if people are trying to hijack the hype from an already successful title?

Any comments from someone in the group?

Do you all realize where that title comes from? Just making sure.

Is this in lieu of a final

Is this in lieu of a final (written!) report?
Will it be available for free to research?

The scale

It's no easy task to video edit four days of hearings. Press for Truth have worked really hard.

Thanks

... for a huge amount of work. Work that doesn't earn you money or a pat on the back. Work that earns gratitude for its integrity.

I realize...

The need to "Press For Truth" is in abundance, but when I hear "Press For Truth," I think of 9/11: Press For Truth. Would have been nice if they picked a different name.

It says "presents"

The trailer says: "Press for Truth presents:" [The Toronto Hearings] I'm presuming? That's how I interpret the title as being, not just "Press for Truth" I could be wrong, that happens quite often. Is Press for Truth now more of an organization name, I don't know? I wouldn't want the title to be Press for Truth either as it makes think of the same documentary.

dtg

edit:

At the pressfortruth.ca website its tilted: "The Toronto Hearings on 9/11: Uncovering Ten Years of Deception"

hope that helps

I contacted the group...

And they told me they coined the phrase "Press For Truth" for their group prior to the release of 9/11: Press For Truth.

Hearings stuff

What we're talking about here is a 5 hour, carefully edited DVD produced by Press for Truth from the Hearings footage. Later, the 20+ hours of the entire Hearings will be posted on the internet. We were keen to see a reasonably concise, usable DVD created that could be distributed to people who would not want to cope with 20 hours of material. The written report, which is intended to include written, edited versions of most presentations as well as concluding statements by Panel members, is still being worked on. It may be a while before it's ready.

Graeme MacQueen

written report

Ah thanks for that info, Graeme!

Getting the facts out, and only the facts

Any chance of getting a DVD that does not include Barbara Honegger? I wouldn't want to spread misinformation.
http://scienceof911.com.au/pentagon/critique-of-barbara-honegger/