Anyone can request these images from NIST under FOIA. They may have to pay $20 or so, but the photos are available from an official government source: NIST. Of course, the types of people who would lob such a baseless assertion would not dare be proven wrong by doing some actual investigative work of their own.

Well, if they are no-planers or hologramoholics you can say whatever you like, it won't make any difference anyway as
they will believe what they want to believe, disregard anything that doesn't fit with their unqualified opinions and
misrepresent anything that seemingly does . That would incidentally also apply to some die-hard Alex Jonesers ..
( And Alex Jones himself, look how he tried to establish Obamas long-form as a fake, based on a 'analysis' of a PDF-recreation of the jpeg-scan of the document.Or how he cherry-picked quotes out of context to make it look like a former Italian P2-mafiosi president confirmed that 9-11 was an 'inside-job' .He also said in that interview that all the 'bin-Laden videos' where produced in one of Berlusconis film-studios. Strangely Alex Jones didn't quote him for that ! I mention this because most of the outlandish 'truthers' do exactly the same : They use dubious sources, often youtube-clips of unknown provenance and transcoded God knows how many times, introducing all kinds of digital artifacts )

In contrast, these photographs have been submitted to NIST by the photographers who took them or the agency they work for .
They are all in the original quality (at least the ones I will be posting in the month to come), most of them contain EXIF-data, not necessarily accurate though,a surprisingly large number of photographers do not set the cameras clock and date accurately.
Also, some may have configured PhotoShop to strip the EXIF-data from the image or set everything to '00' .
(Many photographers use PhotoShop to import and manage their images, that's why you often can find the word 'PhotoShop' in the files meta-data/header .
It does NOT by itself prove or even imply fakery )

Another argument against the photos being fake is the sheer volume of material :
If you for example take the image named DSC_4996.jpg it is 1312x2000 pixels, a total of 2.624.000 pixels .
Each and every pixel would have to be made and placed perfectly, not only in correlation to the previous and following image,
but also to all other available images depicting the same scene .

In case the person making the claim hasn't painfully obviously skipped his medication for to long
or isn't wearing a tin-foil hat with the shiny side facing the wrong direction !! , you could always start by asking them :
' What makes you believe that ? '
If they then go on a rant about how all the Moon-landing photos are fakes, or the Zapruder-film is a fake,
you might want to consider if the 911 truth-movement has any need for their diminished brain-capacity ..

PS : The only videos I show to people who aren't already 'enlightened' are David S Chandlers, because they are NOT 'conspiracy-videos' .
I may also show them some slightly better versions of the footage Chandler uses, but that's about it .
There is no need for speculation on 'who done it', many people just won't have it, and we do not, IMO, have access to the right information needed
to even remotely 'prove' exactly who 'pulled the trigger' . But once people understand, or just consider, the science behind what they are seeing
they tend to acknowledge that a bunch of cave-dwellers on the opposite face of the Planet couldn't have pulled it ..

That anyone can look at that and think they are seeing a gravity driven event.

Simply amazing [head shake].

Cheers!

of material and dust are just amazing, indeed. And it directly contradicts the 'gravity-driven' or 'piledriver' theories.