Let's get back to what is really important: Building 7 and the (un)controlled demolition of the WTC on 9/11
With all the hullabaloo around the "alleged" (and if so illegal) assassination of Osama bin Laden we have almost lost sight about what is the real important issue at hand: The unexplained collapse of WTC 7 and the improbable collapses of WTC 1 and 2 as a result of planes having been flown into them.
While the White house has done everything it seems to convolute the information about what did or did not occur in Abbottabad (which for some reason reminds me uncomfortably of the word Abattoir) it seems to me that we have temporarily lost sight of what is the real issue here. Whatever the role of Osama bin Laden we have a very serious problem which no matter whether he got killed last week or 9 years ago has not been addressed with his death.
Three steel frame buildings collapsed in free fall speed into their own footprint. They did so without precedence and no steel framed building has collapsed since.
Moreover the discovery of Nano-thermite particles and molten metal micro-spheres found it the dust presents a conundrum which must be resolved if we are ever to find what really went on on that day. Most especially building 7 presents a huge problem and not matter the circumstances or the role bin Laden in the events of 9/11 the fact is that neither him nor his 19 martyrs would have had access to this building in order to place the material needed to cause the building to collapse in 6.5 sec into its own footprint.
So can we please get back to the real issues here and leave the Osama bin Laden media hype for what it is: a massive media distraction and election spiel to engage the sheeple away from what really matters. Who had access to the WTC buildings and who placed the explosives and Nano thermite which brought down the WTC on 9/11
- travellerev's blog
- Login to post comments
YES
REMEMBER BUILDING 7.
Everything else is distraction.
YES YES YES!! We have to
YES YES YES!! We have to focus on the collapses, it's one of the only things we can use to win, because it's the only real PROOF that the official story is false. The air defense stuff and failure to follow up on leads before 911 are definitely weaker arguments, but WTC 7 in particular is obvious proof of a cover up. People should not litter this site with Bin Laden fakery. I would guess a lot of newly interested parties are looking at this site, let's not embarrass ourselves and appear to those casual observers to be a bunch of conspiracy theorists! We reject elements of the official story because the evidence doesn't support them!!
V-Don't hate me. This
V-
Don't hate me.
This campaign is not forgotten, but it won't make front page because it is not new, and nothing should be the ONLY thing we work with.
People are searching for news because of Bin Laden being in the news now.
The building 7 campaign video was included on an important post May 2 which included many other 9/11 facts and was rolled off the news of Bin Laden's death, covering the fact he was dumped at sea. It does not have to be a this or that, all or none.
http://911blogger.com/news/2011-05-02/destruction-911-evidence-continues-bin-laden-body-dumped-sea
We are getting as many different versions of UBL's raid as we received for the collapse of WTC 1 & 2.
Why are some of you so resistant to cover this real news of Bin Ladens death and the sloppy handling of the situation, let alone the illegality of it?
The majority of people in
The majority of people in this country follow a media narrative. In that narrative there are people called "Truthers" and "Birthers", and now "Deathers". I am saying that it is better not to play into the hands of those who are constructing this narrative. The forces that work against us have constructed these pejorative categories to turn people away from legitimate questions about bigger and more pressing issues. The 911 issue has to be raised to people in a calm and rational manner focusing on the best available evidence, otherwise we are too easily identified with the figures that are marketed to the public in order to control public perception about our movement. A good example is Alex Jones. That sort of approach, never saw a conspiracy he didn't like, is exactly how our detractors are portraying us. My point is that we can outsmart them, using simple appeals to hard evidence. Making Bin Laden fakery the talk of the town is a huge mistake in my opinion.
In that narrative there are
In that narrative there are people called "Truthers" and "Birthers", and now "Deathers".
I think "deathers" was born on 9/11 Blogger, was it not? I really don't know about that. I refuse to be silent in fear because of mass-ignorance and labeling. But your next point is very important and I agree:
I am saying that it is better not to play into the hands of those who are constructing this narrative
I am with you.
The forces that work against us have constructed these pejorative categories to turn people away from legitimate questions about bigger and more pressing issues
Sure, and paralleling those terms in other dichotomaic terms like "racism"; so all "birthers" and "truthers" are racists. That sucks becuase we are just asking questions or providing answers about a political/historical subject.
That sort of approach, never saw a conspiracy he didn't like, is exactly how our detractors are portraying us.
We aren't the first group in history to be stonewalled and blacked out. We are either gonna make it or not, no matter how they portray us. Again, media trends and human ignorance are also a factor in this.
The 911 issue has to be raised to people in a calm and rational manner focusing on the best available evidence.....
100% agreement there!
otherwise we are too easily identified with the figures that are marketed to the public in order to control public perception about our movement. A good example is Alex Jones.
I will not attack somebody like that without knowing more. I know that Alex's approach works for many people and doesn't work for many people. 100% approval is impossible. There is no evidence that Alex is marketed to the public any more nefariously than anything else in the media. Let's not theorize about it, it is easy to say there are marketing trends and fashions. Or lets theorize about it and say the media is controlled to such an extent that Alex is "marketed to the public in order to control public opinion about our movement".... What road do you choose?
Making Bin Laden fakery the talk of the town is a huge mistake in my opinion.
You may find some comments on Blogger bringing up the old and probably incorrect reports of his death, though not from myself. But much of the conversation here has been on the changing story of the officials. Similar to the collapse of the towers, similar to "no warnings', similar to Jessica Lynch and Pat Tillman, similar to too much at this point.
Assassination of a man without trial while he was not armed is much different than the glorious killing of the 9/11 mastermind who killed 3,000 people, don't you think?
And oh yeah, Remember Building 7.
See it can all be wrapped in one bag reasonably.
In many ways I think the
In many ways I think the movement should have the equivalent of a citizens revolution, in which we take the power back from a leadership that has failed to adequately represent us.