The answer to that question is simple: "You might not care, but any person with more than half a brain would care."

Here is another link to a Jesse Ventura interview by Fox News. Again he lays it on the line. Fox sure have a bunch of idiots working there. Jesse rips them a new a-hole as only he can. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BXkg465J8rQ

"...the Republicans and the Democrats no longer follow the Constitution or our Bill of Rights. Where is our Supreme Court? They are bought off too!"

Jesse Ventura: 16 mln docs cover-up?! US Revolt needed!

Interviews happen fast, and now we have time to sit back and chat.

I think she had a good question that maybe many do not consider. Watch "Land of the Blind". Any independent could be the worst. Here is what I would have said, because I agree with Jesse. All other things being equal, the reason why an independent candidate works better is by not being beholden to either of these two parties.

(I digress: If they've already sworn themselves to political ideologies, well, that is something that I just don;t do. I don't need an ideology to precede actual raw information and my own ability to react and respond to it as an individual. Notice how we're stuck in pundit opinions as badly as we are ideologies, which also preempts any actual information.. Ideology does precede knowledge - of anything. It hasn't read the paper yet, but it already knows what to do. I think that's crap. Millions of ignorant Americans are sold in 5 minutes of ideology and opinion, which I think is sad, because they don't have good 1st amendment representation. They don't read much and no one is looking out for them)

Secondly, the situation in America today calls for a non-partisan public response. The American people cannot be represented by a republican or a democrat - they need to react to both of the major parties; they need to be something else. Every American belongs in this movement. We all have to be able to join. We cannot call this democrat or republican because it isn't. The American revolution did not have any parties beyond the tories and the whigs. The torries were loyal to the king, and the whigs were simply opposed to the torries. This is revolution - this is what we need to do.

America did not originally have political parties, but there was not any way to stop them from being free to form. Political parties are born of practical virtue - they have earthly power by ganging together to gain offices. How does anyone stop that? (They don't) The virtue of the parties is power. The two most powerful organizations in the world are the American republican and democratic parties. Some virtue that is. Not a whole lot of caring or brains or any other redeeming qualities at all. Just the ability to take a knee to some pipe dream ideology, like "Land of the Blind", and to ideologically lust after national control, or to, as both these parties have done, which is to screw the country when they get the upper hand - ether one. Vietnam was democrats. Iraq was republicans. Same thing. A party gained power over America. We are "the American party". Ideology, in all of its forms, is used to control populations with bullcrap 5-minute spiels. The slippery slope is to then not provide any actual information, but to control one's minions with a dream.

Revolution is always dangerous - also the case with America. There were internal and external revolutions. Society at that point could be broken down into 6 classes, from slaves at the bottom to aristocrats at the top. The external revolution was to take out the top two of those 6 tiers. Here's the danger... The 3rd tier is where we got our American fathers. The danger was that either they would get whacked for not being trusted, or they would take over and do something bad. That's tough - there's no knowing what will happen. I'd rather it be exciting anyways. More like life.

The internal revolution involved opposition to the new leaders. This did occur in a variety of places, typically revolving around deeds to land. When government changes over, sometimes you don't own your land anymore. I'm from VT - the whole state came into existence as a part of the internal revolution against the American fathers in 1777. Not the ones we love so much, but elitists in places like New York and Virginia who wanted power and were corrupt and who would invalidate people's deeds to land. So that is always a possibility in a tough time. Let's forget about that, and recognize that revolution in this case is not a question of the replacement, but of the fact that the establishment has to be removed. Nobody knows what will happen next. N o b o d y Given the circumstances, a revolution by the people is a pure, simple, right and true reaction to the republican and democratic powers in America today.

I ramble. I just like watching these interviews, and it's always a pleasure.