I wish the "Underwear Bomber" deception had remained forefront.

Like you guys, I greatly admire the courage and tenacity of Kurt and Lori Haskell.
They stand tall.
Virtually alone, they are trying to expose the government's involvement.
This upcoming court case is a huge liability to Big Sis.
Comments help to show them that we support their endeavors. Thank you!

Kurt has known about the 9/11 false flag operation since before Christmas 2009.
Christmas 2009 was the first domestic terror attack since 9/11/01; another false flag event.
I wish more people were aware of this scenario.

The list of coincidences surrounding Flight 253 and the subsequent cover-up go on and on.
An American speaking "government" agent helped to ramrod the bomber through the ticket agent without a passport (witnessed by several people).
The authorites refused to show the video footage of this event, nor even seriously investigate this alarming allegation.
Flight 253 occurred just prior to the expiration of parts of The Patriot Act.
Vested interests had been adamantly pushing to justify a reason to install body scanners into airports, along with trying to justify a need for greater homeland security measures.
Other passengers on the Flight appear to have been part of the covert government operation. For example: A man at the rear section of the plane was filming the flight BEFORE and during the incident.
When the plane landed, odd moron-type security measures in searching for other bombs occurred. Examples: Passengers and their carry-on luggage were grouped together in the terminal to be checked for explosives. The method of how the plane taxied and how passengers were detained was blatantly stupid if there had been other explosives onboard or in luggage.
Bomb sniffing dogs pointed out a "man in orange" which was witnessed by many of the passengers. The man was led away in handcuffs. The government dynamically changed their story more than 6 times about this occurrence, because they were caught in a bold-faced lie each time. It is probable that the man in orange helped to expedite the bomb placement with Mutallab for a variety of reasons (e.g. to make sure that Mutallab did not get cold feet, to be sure that the explosive went through unnoticed).
The lack of serious government investigations points to a cover-up. The silence by mainstream news about these issues reinforces the fact that this was a false flag event.
There are more oddities which the Haskells have been noting on their blog over the past year.

On Thursday's blog radio show, a caller brought up a valid point about the underwear bomber...
Typically, if a man's testicles are kicked, the man doubles over in pain.
The underwear bomber had his crotch and testicles burning... ...yes, burning on fire.
He did not scream. He did not double over, squirming in pain.
He was almost stoic.

?

http://911blogger.com/search/node/Kurt%20haskell

From Kurt and Lori's Blog...
http://haskellfamily.blogspot.com/2011/01/thoughts-on-umars-hearing-this...

Friday January 28, 2011
Thoughts on Umar's Hearing This Week and a Look Ahead to the October 4th Trial
by Kurt Haskell:

Lori and I attended Umar's status conference this week. The proceedings were extremely interesting to me. First of all, Umar walked into the courtroom in a white t-shirt. He turned and stood about 20 feet in front of me. I kind of had a deja vu moment as when I saw him in Amsterdam, he stood about 10 feet in front of me with a white t-shirt on. I finally got to hear Umar speak. I've never heard him speak until this hearing. His English seemed pretty good, although he had a fairly heavy accent. He did have a Nigerian translator present and he did consult with him a few times. Most of the hearing was spent in a back and forth discussion between Judge Edmunds and Umar. The discussion centered around the need for Umar to accept standby attorney Chambers as his regular attorney. Umar refused over and over again. Everyone in the court room seemed to just want to stand up and say "LET HIM BE YOUR ATTORNEY!". Judge Edmunds finally gave up. Another part of the hearing discussed the fact that Chambers is not Umar's attorney right now, and therefore, Umar and Chambers don't have the attorney client privilege. Thus, anything Umar tells or shows Chambers can be found out by third parties. The U.S. Attorneys seemed particularly troubled with the fact that some of the information they turned over to Umar, could be obtained by third parties and used in a civil case. I wonder why? The hearing then proceeded with a discussion of if and how the evidence held by Umar's previously fired attorney (given to her by the prosecution) would be turned over to Chambers. The result was that it would only be turned over to Umar at Milan Prison and Umar could show Chambers only what he wants to. Note that Chambers, during this discussion, indicated that Milan prison had not been providing faxes or messages of his to Umar or being helpful in scheduling appointments. He went on to state that it was his belief that Milan prison was doing this intentionally, and he suspected that it had received a call from "higher up" to do this. Note that I had a similar experience with Milan prison last year. The hearing concluded with Judge Edmunds setting a trial date. She first suggested June 23, but Chambers wasn't available. She then suggested September 10, but Chambers again wasn't available. She then suggested October 4 and noted that she wouldn't likely reschedule that date. When she set that date, Umar stated that he needed more time than that to read up on how to do the trial. He then asked for a trial date in 2012. Judge Edmunds immediately refused. I was shocked at how adamant Umar was that he was going to represent himself. I now strongly believe that this matter will proceed to trial. What I am concerned about is that Umar will likely represent himself at the trial. If he does so, he may not know how to get the important evidence admitted into the record. If I am correct and Umar does not use Chambers in the trial, I fear that the facts will never be known. I was very impressed with Chambers and Judge Edmunds. I did not get the impression that either is biased towards the prosecution and the "official" story. I talked to Chambers for a few minutes after the hearing and we will be having a conference soon. It was strangely odd that no other passengers were present. This fact put Lori and I back in the crosshairs of the media crunch. We talked to at least 7 reporters, but only Fox 2 Detroit reported the interview. What is also strange is that nearly all of the passengers seem to have disappeared. I no longer have a valid email address or phone number for any other passenger. I am not sure what to make of this.