i read met and drove ellen brown and she said to my face that she's with 9/11 truth

http://www.snagfilms.com/films/title/fuel/

Thanks!

Edit: snagfilms much better than hulu.

The same amount of money put into Iraq's war put into wind turbines would result in much more energy than Iraq's oil will ever produce. Algae bio-fuel is very exciting. Another great film is Who killed the Electric Car. With the EV1 ready to roll up to 300 miles in a single charge in 1994 who knows where we would be now! Probably a solar powered recharging car perhaps? And that's just the unclassified energy sources, who knows what electrogravitics and anti-gravity secrets are being kept out of the market. According to gary mckinnon that was his moral basis and resulting discovery in searching the defense department's computers!

Energy is a crucial key. Solar, Wind, Tidal, & Geo-Thermal energy sources contain vast resources of renewable clean energy. I will check out the film soon. However, the monetary system is the main tool that energy companies use for control to put paid for politicians in place to keep the current system running.

Energy sources like wind, solar, geo-thermal and others must compete for market share and procure pre-determined and unrealistic profit margins to be viable under our corporate oligarchy. Like my father told me 30 years ago which I've repeated since then and is pointed out in the zeitgeist films and that is unless a profit can made by fixing a particular problem, it won't get fixed.

What often gets overlooked is the amount of energy put in to get a certain amount of energy out. For example, the huge undertakings and capital it takes to find, extract, store, and refine resources such as oil and coal to produce our energy needs. Couple that with an inherently inflationary monetary system and what we see going on today was inevitable and probably even predictable. It will take a tremendous change in political and societal wills to change our values and culture in order to develop an economy that serves ALL people. Here's hoping that 9/11 truth holds the key to unlocking the true potential of the human race.

To PeacefulWarrior: Richard C Cook's book is an excellent read. Thanks for mentioning it. I read it some time ago and it has great ideas that can easily be accepted by the masses (IMO) and begin us on a much better path. I highly recommend it. For those unfamiliar Richard Cook is the author "We Hold These Truths: The Hope of Monetary Reform " found at amazon. To learn more about Richard Cook, his website is simply richardccook.com

Yes, very good film. Excellent approach and well rounded. Will definitely recommend. thank Tony

dan

insulted the religious beliefs of many people in its first breath

therefore in their minds it would be a discredited source

some say that disinfo is:

lies from a trusted source

and

the truth from a discredited source

then when they mix some amount of self - discrediting with 9/11 truth what do religious peeps think of the TM? discredited in the minds of some religious peeps!

(i actually agreed with their first breath but that shouldnt be mixed with 9/11T it's a divisive topic)

Religious perspectives have to be kept out. That aspect really did take away from the central message of the film. I found more videos and discussions "debunking" ( I hate that term) the religious chapter of that film than anything else. Of course, it was used to discredit the rest of the film. Certainly that is why both 9/11 and religion were left out of "Addendum" and put in a broader context for the film's central theme. I personally wasn't too offended by the claims made by the first film no more so than the claims many religions make themselves of miracles and unearthly places to spend eternity after we pass on. These beliefs are for own personal comfort and should remain there.

I can see your point about most documentaries having mistakes, factual errors, and speculative conclusions, however this can be said to any documentary IMHO. Whether they're about 9/11 Truth, history of banking, war documentaries, etc... they all take a certain perspective and interpretation of the same set of facts. It is the degree in which the facts they present support the writers conclusions and/or support or disassociate us from our own predetermined beliefs (if any) of the subject that we seem to judge the effectiveness or correctness of the film. What I try to judge is the intent of the writer/producer. Are they purposefully intending to misinform me or is the is the intent to enlighten me, but got some basic facts wrong. There were numerous mistakes in Loose Change 2nd edition, but I never felt like I was intentionally being misled. Sept. Clues on the other hand I felt like the intent was mislead me.

With that in mind you said "it is hard to think of more than one or two doc's that touch on 9/11 truth that I would feel comfortable showing my intelligent friends." and you should see now that are a good number of documentaries to show them. A common tendency is to predetermine what and how an "intelligent" person will perceive information shown to them. A good salesperson knows this is the biggest mistake one can make because we do not know what information forms their perspective regardless of their intelligence. A very good (intelligent) friend I watched zeitgeist with had an entirely different reaction. He didn't believe a word of it. He holds two master's degrees, one in engineering and one in science. I even showed him David Chandler's work since he too is a HS science teacher. Nope, no good, didn't convince him. What convinced him? He watched Nat Geo's 9/11 Science and Conspiracy. He explained to me, "The experiments were so poor, I'm now convinced that we are horribly being lied to. I saw the results of the experiments coming 10 miles away." He asked me to email him links to David Chandlers work again and we both watched LC American Coup together with far different results. What will be the next piece of information he receives that will compel him to activism? I don't know. He told me was afraid of signing any petition or public stance because he doesn't want to be "Van Jonesed" as he put it referring to the heavy right wing leanings of his school board director.

So go ahead and watch it with your "intelligent" friends, get the discussion going. Post their reactions, I am sure we'll all benefit from their point of view. Oh and thank you (and to all) for reading and responding to my blog. The comments are always educational. Good luck everyone, keep fighting the good fight and keep speaking truth to power. We owe to future generations.

Peace everyone.

dan