9-11 Pentagon Episode: Conspiracy Theory With Jesse Ventura
World911Truth.org | Dec. 21, 2010
In this powerful episode, Jesse Ventura leads an investigation that will bring him to visit the Pentagon, meet with a 9-11 commissioner, pilots, a Pentagon whistleblower and other witnesses and will show that the very section of the building that was destroyed was where the evidence of the loss of 2.3 trillion dollars by the same Pentagon was sitting. The 2.3 trillion dollars of tax payers money was lost forever.
The idea that a missile or explosives—not a hijacked jetliner—damaged the Pentagon on September 11, 2001 seems the most unlikely of 9-11 theories. That is, until you look at all the factors, which include eyewitness testimony, crime scene video, expert analysis and the question why, with 85 cameras trained on the building, have only five frames of crash footage have ever been released? Jesse Ventura leads a serious investigation into a tangled web of clues that some say are too sacred to even touch.
Why have the 9-11 Pentagon tapes been scealed and why did the U.S. government never release any credible footage clearly showing that an airplane actually hit the Pentagon? We call on the Obama administration to release the 9-11 Pentagon tapes now.
- world911truth's blog
- Login to post comments
What video are you wanting released?
From the OP....
"Why have the 9-11 Pentagon tapes been scealed and why did the U.S. government never release any credible footage clearly showing that an airplane actually hit the Pentagon? We call on the Obama administration to release the 9-11 Pentagon tapes now."
I don't really see any point in continuing to say release the videos! What are they hiding?! Because they already told us.
Here's the deal with the 85 videos....
Judicial Watch supposedly got the crappy video released that is supposed to show the plane impact. They got most of the press but actually it was a guy named Scott Bingham that did a FOIA that got it released. He was asking for any and all videos showing the plane impact at the pentagon. He had a website called www.flight77.info. It's no longer any good because he got tired of being harassed by "9-11 truthers". But using the wayback machine you can still see his FOIA request response letters.......
http://web.archive.org/web/20080714033052/http://www.flight77.info/
http://web.archive.org/web/20080604015512/www.flight77.info/documents.htm
Yes. They have 85 videos but only ONE showed the actual impact. That is why the rest have not been released. There are no other videos showing the impact at the pentagon.
In Summary:
•She determined that the FBI had 85 videotapes that might be relevant. Of those, 56 "of these videotapes did not show either the Pentagon building, the Pentagon crash site, or the impact of Flight 77 into the Pentagon on September 11."
•Of the 29 remaining videotapes, 16 "did not show the Pentagon crash site and did not show the impact of Flight 77 into the Pentagon."
•Of the 13 remaining tapes which showed the Pentagon crash site, 12 "only showed after the impact of Flight 77."
•The videotape taken from the Citgo gas station did not show the impact.
•No videotapes were located from the Sheraton Hotel, though she located a videotape from the Doubletree Hotel.
Flight77.info's FOIA Release: Doubletree Hotel 9/11 <---I don't see a flyover
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H285_DWX_bQ
September 11 Pentagon Video <--there it is, that's as good as it's going to get
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TAaP4Z3zls8&feature=channel
Pentagon Citgo Video from 9/11
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eA9XI5imNcE
If they have anything they could have a video of the plane ......
"•Of the 29 remaining videotapes, 16 "did not show the Pentagon crash site and did not show the impact of Flight 77 into the Pentagon."
So yea, I suppose we could demand they release every video they have but all you are going to see if anything is a passenger jet--at least according to the witnesses. They have already told us there is no other video of the impact at the pentagon. We could accuse them of lying but I don't know what the point of that would be.
No Witness at the pentagon (and there were lots) said anything hit the pentagon except for a plane. There were plane parts recovered and they were from a passenger jet. The c130 pilot saw the passenger jet. No one saw this passenger jet fly over the pentagon.
Typical pentagon witness, lots say the same thing....
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1ihc1_pentagon-eyewitness-isabel-james...
another witness-there were lots...Is that really a "pretty" lawn?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ISwWfCGyjzQ
This witness obviously would have seen a fly over he was on a nearby roof...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0HBjxYrhI4E&feature=&p=6FA2A860385F97EC&i...
This information...
About the videos is nothing new to those that have been paying attention, and yet, it is still one of the most common memes in the 9/11 Truth Movement. To release the videos... as if they might show something.
they sure would likely show something
If those tapes did not have something to show.. or the black boxes, etc.. they sure would likely release them.
But they haven't, which is why we should be suspicious of their hiding something significant..
But the stand-down that day for planes or whatever to enter Capitol air space, too.. should make us be suspicious.
I applaud the JV programs.. mostly.. since someone is at least asking obvious questions..
and putting April Gallup's witness testimony on the record..
Here's the latest FN issue, Jesse Ventura Pentagon-BP-Police State
A year ago i would have
agreed with your first 2 sentences there
But not now
however i do like the fact that jv
gets it out there whether or not i agree with 100% of what he does
he is well-meaning and has balls
i have his most recent book and i found it quite informative
i was very interested to read about him meeting castro in cuba and also being tailed by US assets during that trip
Uh....
What about the approach? Unless plainly visible cameras were turned off on 9/11 (which would require an explanation in itself), there are several camera that captured the approach from different angles. Here are the questions?
Where are those videos?
If they exist, why haven't they been released?
If they no longer exist, what happened to them?
If they never existed, why were the cameras not functioning on 9/11/2001?
And, finally, why does jimd3100 (or anyone else that shares his/her opinion) think these are not relevant questions or the approach videos are not relevant evidence?