Documentary exposes "hoax" of 9/11

War on Terrorism constructed on World Trade Center hoax documentary suggests

http://lecanadian.com/2010/06/08/war-on-terrorism-constructed-on-world-trade-center-hoax-documentary-suggests/

leave a comment

by Roger Marsh (see his articles on LINK)

Why don’t you show support for our volunteer investigative journalists, by making a small donation?   Support The Canadian.  We are a not-for-profit organization. LINK

Edited by David Jones

The video below suggests that the collapse of one of the World Trade Center Towers suggests a hoax.  The Flyby news video footage below suggests that Muslims were the scapgoats for the execution of the War on Terror to carry out an agenda for a global empire controlled by the “true architects” of 9/11.

Building 7 was the third skyscraper to be reduced to rubble on September 11, 2001. According to the government, fires, primarily, leveled this building, but fires have never before or since destroyed a steel skyscraper. LINK

The team that investigated the collapse were kept away from the crime scene. By the time they published their inconclusive report in May, 2002, the evidence had been destroyed. LINK

Jim Hoffman asks “Why did the government rapidly recycle the steel from the largest and most mysterious engineering failure in world history?” LINK

.

VIDEO 2:

Broader political context: VIDEO 3:

Read about the Book of Revelation 2012 cult in relation to the Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill, LINK

You could win: Help support The Canadian HERE.  LINK

LINKS do not work.

LINKS do not work.

Site is back up now

Le Canadian's web site was down yesterday. The article link works again.

The site allows coments.

The site allows comments on articles. You don't even have to register. I added mine. (you can too).

Comment on your comment

"Building 7 fell at free fall acceleration for at least 2.25 seconds right at the start of its destruction."

Doesn't NIST claim that it wasn't right at the beginning, but in the middle third of its "wet doughnut" curve?

free fall is impossible without an external energy source

It's impossible anywhere NIST tries to put it .
Further discussion of the impossible just feeds into: "let them discuss themselves to death"

Free fall occurred less than a second from start of movement

The free fall occurred within less than a second from the start of any detectable movement. About .5 to .6 seconds to be more precise. Watch this video To me that is right at the start.

Access denied

"You are not authorized to access this page. "

Link mangled, trying again

The link was supposed to go to this video by David Chandler WTC7 in Freefall: No Longer Controversial