CIA Fight Against Communism Bolsters Radical Islam

 also see: US Intel Links to Islamic Militancy Timeline and OUR TERRORISTS by Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed - loose nuke

source: www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php

CIA Fight Against Communism Bolsters Radical Islam

by NPR STAFF

The CIA's determination to roll back communism during the Cold War inadvertently allowed radical Islamists to gain a foothold in Europe, according to a new book by Pulitzer Prize-winning author Ian Johnson.

A Mosque in Munich: Nazis, the CIA and the Rise of the Muslim Brotherhood in the West details the Nazis' attempts to create a fifth column within the Soviet empire by becoming allies with Muslim minorities living in the Soviet Union.

"The Soviet Union had oppressed Islam, closed many mosques and mistreated many minorities in the Soviet Union, including Muslims," Johnson tells host Guy Raz. "After the Germans ended up with literally millions of Red Army POWs in the war, they began to realize that many of these were potential soldiers to fight the Soviet Union."

After the war, the CIA and West German intelligence operatives, many of them former Nazis, took over the project.

Johnson says the CIA was looking for Muslims who could go into the Third World and speak credibly to counter Soviet propaganda. The Islamic Center of Munich had become the center for the Muslim Brotherhood in Germany and to some extent in Europe.

"The CIA set up a large covert propaganda operation in Munich and recruited many of these people," Johnson says.

The CIA began to support the activities of the Muslim Brotherhood in Europe and elsewhere. But U.S. attention shifted when the Vietnam War heated up, Johnson says, and it wasn't until the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in the late 1970s that focus on the project returned.

Shortly after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, Johnson says, there was a desire to cut off all ties with Islamist groups like the Muslim Brotherhood and even to prosecute them. The effort failed, however, because the group could not be linked directly to terrorism.

By the second term of the Bush administration, CIA documents show there were efforts to cultivate Muslim Brotherhood groups in Europe for U.S foreign policy aims. Using Islam in this way is a fundamental problem in how we look at the religion, Johnson says.

"It's come back to haunt us again and again," he says. "But we continue to make the same mistake."

Excerpt: A Mosque In Munich

The Eastern Front

Garip sultan lay flat in a machine-gun nest, his stomach pressed to the ground. He craned his neck forward, looking out into the grasslands for the enemy. His superiors had ordered him to hold one of the Red Army’s forward positions outside the Ukrainian city of Kharkov. It was May 1942, and the Germans were launching a giant counteroffensive. All around him he heard shells roar and panzers rumble. The nineteen-year-old swept his binoculars left and right across the Ukrainian steppes but saw nothing. He felt doomed.

He thought back unhappily to how he had ended up here. Sultan was a minority in Stalin’s Soviet Union,a Tatar from the district of Bashkir. Turkic peoples had settled this region when the last great wave of nomadic invaders swept out of Central Asia in the thirteenth century, under Genghis Khan. As Russia expanded, theTatars had lost their independence, becoming one of the many non-Russian peoples who made up nearly half the vast country’s population.

Under Soviet rule, oppression of these peoples had increased, especially for those like Sultan’s parents who had run small businesses. Soviet cadres called them capitalists and took everything. They nationalized his father’s transport business and confiscated the family home. Even their horse was taken. The family, once rich, was able to keep just two pieces of furniture bought during a trip to England: a mirror, now cracked, and a clock, now broken. Before Sultan’s father died, he encouraged his son to join the Young Pioneers, then later the young people’s organization Komsomol, and eventually the party. This was the only way to survive in Stalin’s Soviet Union, the older man had said. Sultan followed his father’s advice. He joined Komsomol, attended high school, and had planned to study metallurgy. He tried his best to become a new Soviet man.

Then came June 1941 and the German invasion. The Red Army wasn’t yet the formidable fighting machine that would eventually destroy the bulk of Hitler’s armies. In the first year of the war it suffered enormous casualties and surrendered huge territories. Every available man was called up and thrown straight into action. Sultan was conscripted and quickly assigned to a ragtag group of non-Russians like himself, miserably equipped and poorly led. They were set to disintegrate upon contact with the enemy.

As his unit took up position outside Kharkov, Sultan keenly felt his status as a minority. When the troops lined up for inspection, the commanding officer, a Russian, asked minorities to step forward. The officer gave four of them, including Sultan, the suicidaltask of creeping across the no man’s land between the two armies and throwing German-language propaganda toward the enemy lines. According to this quixotic plan, the German soldiers would read the pamphlets, revolt against their officers, and surrender. No one anticipated that the Germans had set up tripwires. Sultan’s group was cut to pieces by the ensuing machine-gun fire; Sultan was the only survivor. He hid for two days in the high grasses of the steppe before creeping back to his lines. For his bravery, his commanding officer promised him a medal. But Sultan felt the honor was hollow. His loyalty to the Soviet system, which he had honestly tried to cultivate, was evaporating.

Excerpted from A Mosque in Munich: Nazis, the CIA, and the Rise of the Muslim Brotherhood in the West by Ian Johnson. Copyright 2010 by Ian Johnson. Reprinted by permission of Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. All rights reserved.

Even NPR gets it right sometimes.

I saw this headline and was pleased that this fact is being re-exposed to the public.

Radical Islam serves the imperialists agenda.

bolsters radical islam?

"Shortly after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, Johnson says, there was a desire to cut off all ties with Islamist groups like the Muslim Brotherhood and even to prosecute them. The effort failed, however, because the group could not be linked directly to terrorism."

This article suggest that Radical Islam was responsible for the attacks on 9/11. We know, after years of study since 9/11/2001, the idea that radical Islam was responsible for the attacks on 9/11/2001 is simply not true. The attacks on 911 were not orchestrated by radical Islam. This theory that Radical Islam was responsible for the 911 was purposely used to shield the true perps of the crime from detection. Suggesting or promoting this idea is irresponsible and does just that, it shields the true perps of the crime. Is there not anyone on 911blogger.com who cares to point out that this article promotes a lie that is killing people as we speak?

Consider this. Hundreds of thousands of Muslims are being slaughtered because of this lie. A modern day Muslim Holocaust is going on.

Engineered 'clash of civilizations' to justify a 'war on terror'

from my bio: "Articles in my blog not written by me are posted for posterity, information, feedback and debunking, and may or may not represent my views."

jpass: "This article suggest that Radical Islam was responsible for the attacks on 9/11. We know, after years of study since 9/11/2001, the idea that radical Islam was responsible for the attacks on 9/11/2001 is simply not true. The attacks on 911 were not orchestrated by radical Islam. This theory that Radical Islam was responsible for the 911 was purposely used to shield the true perps of the crime from detection. Suggesting or promoting this idea is irresponsible and does just that, it shields the true perps of the crime. Is there not anyone on 911blogger.com who cares to point out that this article promotes a lie that is killing people as we speak?"

jpass, you just provided an answer to your last question. And if you read through my blog 911reports.com, and my original material and my comments here, you'll know that I understand the OCT is false, there's an ongoing cover up, and the Establishment and the Republocrat Party have used 9/11 to justify the war on terror, the deaths of well over a million Iraqis, Afganis, coalition soldiers and other people, and the imposition of a Constitution-undermining defacto police state in the US. You'll see that I support a full investigation into 9/11 with accountability for everyone, including those involved in the cover up, which includes the disinformation campaign.

I'm not content to simply blame 9/11 on certain Jews and Zionists, elements of the state of Israel and the Mossad without a full investigation. I'm also not content to simply explain away the evidence pointing to certain members of the Saudi royal family/GID and Pakistan's ISI- especially not when the Bush administration and MSM were working really hard to cover it up and explain it away. And I also want the evidence addressed which points to non-Jewish elements in the Bush, Clinton and Giuliani administrations, and the JCS, NMCC, NSA, NORAD, FBI, CIA, and their counterparts in the defense/intel support industry, as well as the financial sector. I'm extremely skeptical that a full and honest investigation would reveal 9/11 and the subsequent exploitation of it is the responsibility primarily or only of Jews (or do you prefer the dog whistle codeword "Zionists"?)

jpass, do you really believe that US foreign policy in the Middle East and Central Asia was not inflaming the sentiments of Muslims and manufacturing terrorists for decades before 9/11? That the Carter/Brzezinski/CIA/USAID campaign to radicalize and train Muslims in Afghanistan to use as soldiers in a US proxy war with the Soviets- which Bin Laden was part of- didn't actually exist or had nothing to do with providing a pool of recruits for Bin Laden and the CIA to use as proxies/patsies for other terrorist operations, possibly including 9/11? Do you really believe that that the evidence of many other instances of the CIA, Mossad, ISI, GID and other intel agencies infiltrating, provoking and using extremists as proxies is all 'disinfo'? Do you really believe the alleged hijackers (the patsies) didn't exist, and that the trail they left all over the US- while under surveillance by FBI informants and Mossad agents (possibly working with elements in the CIA)- was simply made up?

Do you really believe that those members of the Establishment elite who planned 9/11 and the Iraq and Afghanistan wars didn't foresee that these invasions and occupations alone would radicalize even more Muslims, thereby justifying and prolonging the manufactured 'war on terror', in the event there weren't easy victories followed by an invasion of Iran, justified by a false pretext if necessary to mollify/inflame the American public? You said, "Consider this. Hundreds of thousands of Muslims are being slaughtered because of this lie. A modern day Muslim Holocaust is going on."

Complete 9/11 Timeline
http://www.historycommons.org/project.jsp?project=911_project

no context

You are essentially copy n' pasting WOT propaganda and providing no context for your readers. I am living proof that this approach gives the impression that Loose Nuke believes Radical Islam was responsible for the attacks on 911. As a policy, this gives the impression that 911 Truth as a movement believes this stuff, which it does not.

"if you read through my blog 911reports.com, and my original material and my comments here, you'll know that I understand the OCT is false" -Loose Nuke

I shouldn't have to read your blog, your original material AND your comments to figure out why you're posting THIS obvious anti-Muslim propaganda. Give some context.

"I'm not content to simply blame 9/11 on certain Jews and Zionists, elements of the state of Israel and the Mossad without a full investigation."

That's a good position to take. But why do you not apply it evenly to Muslims as well? Whats up with the double standard? Why is it ok to post obvious anti-Muslim propaganda that further promotes the lie that Muslims were responsible for the 911 Attacks?

The article that you posted explicitly blames the attacks on 9/11/2001 on the designated patsies, Muslims. Just regurgitating anti-Muslim propaganda with no real context for the sake posting content seems irresponsible.

I'm not arguing that Muslims and others have not been radicalized, that the CIA and others haven't used these groups. I'm not talking about that and I don't disagree that this stuff happens to some extent. But it's relation to the attacks on 9/11/2001 is a fabricated relationship. This article that you've posted is part of and helps establish that fabricated relationship.

What is the point of posting this article?

Loose Nuke,

Help me out here...

Do you believe that radical islam was responsible for the attacks on 9/11/2001?