Jian Ghomeshi, a normally respected and objective interviewer dropped all objectivity when he interviewed Alex Jones, then author David Aaronovich (promoting his latest book about conspiracy theories. Here is the link to his show called simply "Q."
http://www.cbc.ca/q/blog/2010/03/do_conspiracy_theories_help_or.html
Jian's tone toward Jones was mocking, yet respectful toward the author who was promoting his book.
It is easy to post comments. Podcasts are available online. It may take a day before it is posted.
Here is my response.
Jian. I'm disappointed that you weren't exactly objective in your treatment of the different guests. Yes Alex Jones can be a little excitable and sometimes controversial but he had some very valid points. On the other hand your second guest was typically smug and condescending and suggested the simplest answer is usually the truth. By that logic you should review the facts about 9/11 (I have no opinion about Diana.) If you apply Occam's razor to the collapse of "building 7" for instance, the evidence of thermate, same day eyewitness testimony of bombs going off, and freefall collapse, the simple answer would conclude that it was a controlled demoltition. Same goes with the military grade anthrax that was sent to certain politicians and reporters who questioned the official story. I could go on forever but I would rather suggest you, Jian, contact Richard Gage of ae911truth.org and keep an open and objective mind.
Thank you.

Posted by: Arnie Hyma- Bowmanville | March 10, 2010 04:44 PM