As Ground Zero cases go to trial, respirator rule is revealed

As Ground Zero cases go to trial, respirator rule is revealed
BY Alison Gendar
DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER
Sunday, February 28th 2010, 4:00 AM

A lawyer in two Ground Zero sickness cases green-
lighted for trial says he has a smoking gun: buried
city documents that prove firefighters should have
gotten respirators.

The papers emerged in a veritable mountain of files
the city turned over to workers who believe they
were sickened by toxins after the 9/11 terrorist
attacks.

Lawyer Andrew Carboy, whose firm represents more
than 600 firefighters, said the FDNY had rules on
the book requiring Bravest be equipped with
respirators before Sept. 11.

But memos showing that weren't handed over until
this summer - in a data dump of 3 million
documents - five years after the legal battle began.
"They provide everyone with helmets, with bunker
gear, with [air] packs. They could have done the
same with respirators, and they withheld the
documents saying they had a program to do it,"
Carboy said.

Carboy's firm represents Firefighters Frank Malone
and the late Raymond Hauber, whose cases are
among a dozen picked to go to trial, starting in May.

Four were chosen from more than 9,000 by a federal
judge, four by the city, and four by plaintiffs'
lawyers. More than $1 billion in damages hinge on
the outcome.

To show the city is liable, Carboy plans to wield
memos about the FDNY's "respiratory protection
program," which was supposed to provide
respirators for "reasonably foreseeable emergency
situations" like building collapses.

The FDNY didn't follow its own guidelines and had
only 600 respirators for more than 11,200
uniformed members when the twin towers fell Sept.
11, Carboy said.

A 2003 FDNY memo called for the head of safety and
health for the department, Tennyson Headley, to be
canned in part because of the dysfunctional
respirator program. But Headley is still on the FDNY
payroll.

'a data dump of 3 million documents'

Such 'data dumps' are a tried and true method of attempting to continue a cover-up: Technically comply with orders to disclose, while including such a mass of irrelevant material in the hopes that the really pertinent documentation will get lost in the shuffle.

So it seems they were supposed to have many more respirators in use by 2001; but I also wonder, did the FDNY maximize the use of those respirators which they did actually have on hand on 9/11.

Ayway, kudos to this legal team for keeping at it and unearthing this information. Go, go, go get 'em!

Ground Zero Health Case

Ground Zero Health Case Lawyer Claims To Have Respirator Smoking Gun

http://gothamist.com/2010/03/01/ground_zero_health_case_lawyer_clai.php

A lawyer for two of the 9/11 sickness cases believes he has a smoking gun to prove that firefighters were improperly equipped at Ground Zero, and should have been given respirators. Lawyer Andrew Carboy, whose firm represents more than 600 firefighters, found the city documents on respirator requirements buried among nearly 3 million other FDNY documents that were only released this past summer. Carboy told the News, "They provide everyone with helmets, with bunker gear, with [air] packs. They could have done the same with respirators, and they withheld the documents saying they had a program to do it."

Carboy represents two of the firefighters, Frank Malone and the late Raymond Hauber, whose cases were chosen to go to trial in Manhattan this May from a pool of more than 10,000 health complaints, all claiming illness after work at the WTC Manhattan site or at Fresh Kills on Staten Island. According to Carboy, the FDNY didn't follow its own guidelines on respirators, and only had 600 of them available for more than 11,200 uniformed firefighters when the twin towers fell. Meanwhile, city defense attorneys want to throw out many of the first lawsuits headed for trial, which they claim are "baseless."