In 100 Years, the Neocons Will Be Recognized as the Tyrants They Are
http://georgewashington2.blogspot.com/2008/12/in-100-years-neocons-will-be-recognized.html
Neocon John Bolton claims that “in 100 years,” people won’t remember two of the biggest stains on Bush’s record, Guantánamo Bay and Abu Ghraib:
“In the immediate aftermath of 9/11, he was strong and decisive and that was critical for both the country and for the Western world,” believes John Bolton. “In 100 years people aren’t going to remember Guantánamo or Abu Ghraib, they’re going to remember 9/11 and Bush’s reaction to it.”
Is he right?
No.
60 years after Hitler, the exact thing which we most remember are his concentration camps.
Do we remember the false threats he drummed up to scare his people? The fake threat from Poland, for example, which is the exact parallel to the Neocon's fake "war on terror"?
Well, people either understand that Hitler used false flag terror in the same way that the Neocons, or else they don't know anything about Gleiwitz Incident, the Reichstag fire and other precipitating incidents which Hitler used to drum up fear of an imaginary enemy.
One thing is for certain. In 100 years, 9/11 will be seen as an American Gleiwitz Incident, and the Neocons will be recognized as the tyrants they are.
- GeorgeWashington's blog
- Login to post comments
More on Bush Legacy
Agreed people will remember the crime and corruption, the stolen elections, Katrina, and Bush bailouts as well. And just like WWII was preventable, if FDR and Churchill really wanted to stop Hitler early on, Iraq and Afghanistan were preventable, too, and downright ridiculous.
Iraq and Afghanistan were completely fraudalent
The threats from Afghanistan and Iraq were completely manufactured and in my mind aren't even in the same boat with what FDR and Churchill were dealing with.
I think it might be debatable as to whether FDR and Churchill could have stopped Hitler before any hostilities broke out. Hitler did have a thirst for expansion and used false flags himself to deceive the German people and initiate his plans. He was totally offensive in every way.
I believe FDR and Churchill simply reacted to Hitler's and his Japanese allies' offensiveness, and Pearl Harbor (even if FDR let it happen on purpose) would have been a reaction to the hegemony being practiced by Japan and Germany at the time.
While it is understandable that some would want to hold FDR to account for allowing Pearl Harbor, the false flags and the use of the military to achieve expansionistic aims by Hitler are on another level by themselves and this is what we have been living with in the U.S. for the last eight years.
Bolton is correct...
...in 100 years people will not remember George Bush for Guantánamo Bay and Abu Ghraib. He will be remembered for his complicity in the 9/11 attacks.
Good Point
Fortunately we will not have to wait 100 yrs for Justice to reach its course.
On the way. Sooner or later.
BTW Happpy New Year.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it