I like ADS and David Swanson so when I saw this "article" posted on their main site, I lit into him about it. I didn't even question why the author of it, Matt Taibbi, would write it; I focused on why, in heavens name, would ADS publish such an unresearched and laughable example of yellow journalism.

The guy attacks all "truthers" and the movement itself with completely unsubstanciated stawman arguements. It is really idiotic when you read it. So much so, he offers as his final "evidence", a made up conversation about the planning of the attacks. I shit you not.

"f there was such a conspiracy, remember, something like the following conversation would have had to have taken place:"

Look, do us all a favor, I left a, hopefully, thought provoking comment that put out there some facts for people to check on and so they can see that one side of this argument still uses "facts" rather than just insults.

Then I called into question why David Swanson, one of the biggest advocates of regime change in this country, would post this on his site.

I hope that some of you would have the time to go by and have a crack at Taibbi's work. It's like shooting fish in a barrel. Maybe David will get the point and do some research of his own.

http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/node/33511