Thanks for identifying this well organized and right-to-the-point site.

I'd never heard of the site before, but his last name did ring a bell.

Too bad the sheeple in this country could care less about facts.

He should work on the physical layout of it, though.
It's not very easy to read.

Vincent Princiotta wasn't his son. I believe he was his nephew or cousin's son.

He's a legal expert, very well spoken, recently has been heavily involved with ae911truth.org, and we are greatful for the help and advice he provides.

Nobody confessed to Operation Himmler or the Reichstag fire either, so the evidence must be wrong there as well.

or is Doug MacEachern the "editor"

(If I had to write that article) ...I wouldnt sign it either

I do believe my own eyes- and my own eyes didnt see what the commission report stated- so that stupid quote works both ways.

All these articles are so dumb, all they do is shoot the messanger, not try to disprove the message ( which they obviously cant)

I get the pun..took me a while...i'm slow...but you say 'not for real', 'psychological warfare tactics'....
i agree as far as being a certified idiot asshole...
In fact maybe it's not even that much, but any random person are likely to think in this fashion as well. It's simply denial, trying to grasp at straws what explains away from taking seriously an idea that would otherwise make them very ill.
Saying CIA! or agent! or any of that just emboldens their stereotypical view of people who question such events.

Anyways, yes, it doesn't matter too much if people are talking. Even if we did have somebody come forward and say they were a part of the plan, it would still get swept under the rug..just as it did with Hunt.
We don't know if somebody hasn't slobbered into a bar talking about the horror they committed....but the likelihood isn't to be disbelieved as I could just stroll into a place and talk about how I was a part of the plan and nobody would take me seriously either. It would then be considered to 'never happened'...just like if somebody yells in the woods and nobody is around to hear it.
Even if I really was involved and somebody did take it seriously, and it did cause a scene to get onto the newspaper somewhere, it would later be blown off on some technicality of not having been able to entirely prove my involvement. The media simply could care less about hearing about confessors to the 9/11 plan if it's not fitting what the majority of government claims it to be.
Even if there were confessors aplenty and they do acknowledge the presence of confessors to the plan, they'll move the goalposts to some other topic of why it all fails in their mind.
Confessors or not, physics cannot be denied. Buildings don't crush themselves the same rate as the crushing object (the block of floors above failure area), even if itself wasn't disintegrating, was falling through air.
However, fewer places to put goalposts is obviously going to convince easier.
The same way the gaps religion have a foothold in are getting smaller as science expands.

============================================================================
"The most perfidious way of harming a cause consists of defending it deliberately with faulty arguments."
Friedrich Nietzsche, The Gay Science, section 191
German philosophe