Last Sunday, on "Live from the Left Coast" on KPFK in Los Angeles, Ian Masters had on James Moore the co-author of "Bush's Brain: How Karl Rove Made George W. Bush Presidential" and, more recently, "The Architect: Karl Rove and the Dream of Absolute Power."

I decided to call up and draw out the connections among the allegations made in Philip Shenon's book "The Commission," and the follow up by Philly 9-11 Truth (see: Karl Rove Is Questioned About His Involvement With the 9/11 Commission by Philly 9/11 Truth )

The show recording is here: http://www.ianmasters.org/left_coast.html -under March 30th, 2008- My question is at the 41:10 mark.

Me: "...I think that this is a very crucial sort-of connection for Karl Rove, because that Commission was highly manipulated and, if it was manipulated and it was a cover-up, then, under Article III Section 3 of the Constitution, I think we can consider it a treasonous cover-up."

James Moore: "I don't have any doubt that Karl was running the 9-11 Commission. And, obviously, the people who were the key people on that, Jeremy, were appointed by the Bush administration, were beholden to the Bush administration, obviously there were some Democrats on there. But the people in charge, the people who were issuing and writing the reports and saying "let's look at this evidence and let's not look at this evidence," were people who reported to Karl."

Another caller, at about 50:15, asks: "To the degree, as was pointed out, the 9-11 Commission was basically answering to Karl Rove, doesn't that, again, cause us to want to look more deeply at what the hell were they covering up?"

Moore responds: "Well it certainly should. I want to know. You know, I don't buy into the conspiracy theories obviously and I don't think most folks do. But the more the 9-11 Commission covers up and redacts information about Saudi Arabia and the money for these terrorist groups and saying it's going to harm our relationship with an important ally, the more that the 9-11 Commission covers up, just as the more people the Warren Commission failed to interview in the Kennedy assassination, the more it gives life to conspiracy theory and urban myth. And ultimately the truth can come up and whack us upside the head and we don't believe it anymore. So, you know the 9-11 Commission is doing America a great disservice. If there is anything that has sustained our democracy, it's been the fact that we hang our dirty laundry out in the air for everybody to see and then we decide that it's dirty and we go clean it. And we're not doing that in this process."

Then Ian Masters says: "Well it's a no-brainer to say that the 9-11 Commission failed. I think everybody knows that And including the two heads of the 9-11 Commission- they came out subsequent to its publication and said "we were lied to by the Department of Defense and by the FAA" and that the full story's not being told. So, I mean to take that obvious point and then to turn that into that it was, you know, all that other stuff they talk about is just surreal."

What is really surreal that these two supposed intellectuals, who have probably not even looked at the full array of facts about the most crucial event of the 21st century, cling to their state-sponsored myth about OBL+KSM+19 while breezily admitting the true story is being covered up, potentially in a treasonous manner. What then do you think IS being covered up Mr. Masters? Incompetence? Pakistani funding of the hijackers? Is that why the two Israeli operatives caught at the Mexican Parliament with Glock 9mm's, grenades and other explosives, had Pakistani passports. Silly Pakistanis, imitating Israelis again while attempting to frame themselves.

Again, see:
Speaking with Michael Medved about 10/10, 9/11 and the Involvement of the Deep Israeli State
and
Medved hypocritically blind to Israeli false-flag terrorism: Says 10-10-01 terror attempt is "bogus story," "never happened"

I'm starting to get tired of pussyfooting around the question of cover-up and new investigations. I'm going to start laying it out as I see it with facts that back it up. To me, it looks like 9-11 was a false-flag psyop sponsored by treasonous criminals in the US government, operationally conducted by Israeli covert operatives. And I'm going to just start saying it and seeing how people react on the radio and in some truthsquads.

Obviously, Mr. Masters, and most of his guests, still need schooling on the facts of 9-11- you know, those stubborn things. It is usually a pretty good show that Masters hosts on Sunday morning on KPFK ( www.kpfk.org ) from 11am-1pm PST (818-985-5735). He ordinarily takes calls towards the last half of the second hour "Live from the Left Coast." Remind him that, as Aldous Huxley remarked, "facts don't cease to exist because they are ignored."

You can also go hear the rest of the taped dialogue with Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson, played on last week's show, where I was able finally, after Masters interrupted me, to ask him this question about supporting a new 9-11 Commission:

Interestingly, and I'm no conspiracy theorist you know, my question was one of two that were unluckily cut out because of sound problems. Honestly though, I heard the recording beginning to skip. Listen to the end where Wilkerson identifies 6 people who he thinks can be prosecuted, including John Yoo, David Addington and Douglas Feith. Interesting that he completely leaves out the P and VP. Treason, as I have said before, is so like whatever these days in DC huh?!

http://www.ianmasters.org/left_coast.html - March 24th with Colonel Wilkerson