I fell that people often fail to include the Anthrax attacks as part of "9/11".

Given the undeniable proof that US military grade Anthrax was used, it is yet another clear indicator that 9/11 was carried out in part by US agents.

The alternative that some rogue was sitting on the Anthrax just waiting for an event like 9/11 to occur is absurd.

Jesus, I wish I had more help on this.

www.TheShellGame.net

Bill Douglas

While it seems policy for HC to have many shows (sometimes whole marathons) regarding mysterious phenomena (ghosts, aliens, monsters, etc), yet run shows that deny possible existence of government complicity in big crimes (9/11, JFK)...in itself a sort of doublethink (whether or not it is intended or a byproduct formulated by coincidence theorists)
(i.e. coincidence theorist: If HC runs shows on mysterious phenomena why would they bias a show to deny 9/11 to be an inside job?)

beware of the doublethink potential that coincidence theorists (self proclaimed 9/11 inside job debunkers) will use.

(i.e. Coincidence theorist: ‘Hey, HC said no inside job on 9/11, but does say inside job on anthrax attacks, if there is such an overwhelming amount of info concerning inside job on 9/11 and admitted that there was on the anthrax attacks, they have no reason to bias a show excluding the information to argue against inside job on 9/11 if there is one! therefore, history channel didn't bias their 9/11 conspiracy-debunking show’)

either way, this is a good find. it begs the question that if anthrax attacks are an inside job, what the hell is stopping the permission of suggesting 9/11 to be an inside job, based on the information specific to it?

============================================================================
"The most perfidious way of harming a cause consists of defending it deliberately with faulty arguments."
Friedrich Nietzsche, The Gay Science, section 191
German philosophe

It would seem they are promoting the lone lunatic meme here.

Do you think that - even with 9/11 - the Patriot Act might not have been passed without the anthrax scare?

http://www.911blogger.com/node/9998

The gist of the video is the "United States is hiding a terrorist within the defense establishment." THE UNITED STATES IS THE TERRORIST!

From: http://www.whale.to/a/an.html
CONSIDER THESE COINCIDENCES

- The anthrax attacks were concurrent with the debate of Bush s
Patriot Act by Congress and the media.

- All the senators receiving anthrax letters were trying to amend the
Patriot Act to protect civil liberties and the innocent.

- Two senators received anthrax letters mailed the same day that
Senator Feingold blocked an attempt to rush the bill through without
discussion or amendments.

- Senator Leahy received an anthrax threat after he expressed
reservations about the Bill. As Chairman of the Judiciary Committee,
he managed the debate on the Bill.

- Senate Majority Leader Daschle received the first Senate anthrax
letter as he led the opposition to the original version of the Bill.

- After receiving the anthrax letter, Daschle switched from
supporting a 2 year limit on the Bill, later defending a 4-year
sunset clause as the appropriate balance.

- No Republican received an anthrax letter.

-The House and Senate buildings were closed and not reopened until
after the Patriot Act was passed.

- The Supreme Court was shut down with an anthrax scare the day after
the constitutionally-challenged Patriot Act was signed by President
Bush.

-All the contaminated letters contained the Ames strain of anthrax,
the DNA of which is traced to the original batch preserved in a
university lab in Ames, Iowa. This strain was weaponized in Utah
into a potent powder with an elaborate secret technique developed at
Fort Detrick, Md.

-The FBI failed to interview Ft. Detrick anthrax experts for two
months into their investigation, doing it only after the experts
complained to the press of gross incompetence on the part of the FBI.

- The FBI allowed the Iowa state lab to destroy the original batch of
the Ames strain, making tracing the anthrax type more difficult.

-The FBI overruled local homicide detectives who think that an anthrax
expert was murdered, possibly because he knew too much.

A CURIOUS FLOW OF EVENTS

The following is a merger of A Chronology of Anthrax Events,
published by the South Florida Sun-sentinel, and the simultaneous
proceedings of the Patriot Bill in Congress as reported in the local
press.

Sept.16 -- Anti-terrorism bill proposed.

Sept.18 Two letters containing Ames anthrax are postmarked in
Trenton, N.J., addressed to Tom Brokaw of NBC Nightly News and the
New York Post.

Sept.28 Boy visiting ABC network in New York contracts anthrax.

Oct.2 USA Patriot Act anti-terrorism bill is introduced in
Congress. Oct.3 Tabloid editor of Boca Raton Sun, Florida,
hospitalized with anthrax and dies two days later.

Oct. 3 Senate Majority Leader Thomas A. Daschle (Dem., S.D.) says
he doubts the Senate could take up the anti-terrorist legislation
before next week, as the administration had asked. Attorney General
John A. Ashcroft accuses Senate Democrats of dragging their feet.

Oct. 4 Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick J. Leahy
(Dem., Vt.) accuses the administration of reneging on an agreement on
the anti-terrorist bill. Some warn that lawmakers are were
overlooking constitutional flaws in their rush to meet the
administration's timetable.

Oct. 6 Under the headline, Glow of bipartisanship seems to
dim, the Baltimore Sun reports: &opposed by most Senate Democrats,
Ashcroft complained about the rather slow pace&over his request for
law enforcement powers&Hard feelings remain.

Oct. 8 Under the headline, Cracks in Bipartisanship Start to Show,
The Washington Post reports, Congress has lost some of the
shock-induced unity with which it first responded to the [9/11]
attacks.

Oct.9 Senator Feingold blocks an attempt to rush the Patriot Act to
a vote with little debate and no opportunity for amendments.
Feingold criticizes the Bill as a threat to liberty.

Oct.9 Identical anthraxed letters are postmarked in Trenton,
N.J., with lethal doses to Senators Daschle and Leahy.

Each time this comes up, no one (except me) bothers to bring up LT. COLONEL PHILIP ZACK, who was FIRED from the laboratory, and then filmed by security cameras in the secure ANTHRAX STORAGE AREA.

Zack was fired, not so coincidentally, for racially motivated attacks against a Muslim co-worker. Zack is a radical zionist.

"Documents from the inquiry show that one unauthorized person who
was observed entering the laboratory at night was Lt. Col. Philip Zack who
at the time no longer worked at Fort Detrick. A surveillance camera recorded
Lt. Col. Zack being let in at 8:40 P.M. on January 23, 1992, by another
conspirator by the name Dr. Marian Rippy. Dr. Philip M. Zack has not been
arrested. "

--Interesting that Google will not find this article on my own blog, that I reposted there from whatreallyhappened. Google is censoring certain search results (big no-no for them right?).

http://crimesofthestate.blogspot.com/2006/11/unindicted-anthrax-murderer...

I just watched the entire program on YT.

- they talk all the time about a single person behind the attack; how could they be so sure it was a one-man job?
- they don't ask why the two Democrat leaders might have been selected as recipients
- they talk about the possibility that this was a bioterror experiment or "risk assessment" gone awry, but then somehow seem to dismiss this on the grounds that the USA had supported a global ban on the development of biological weapons and that the corresponding conspiracy would therefore have been too big
- towards the end they say that foreigners could have obtained the anthrax from the black market