This is a fine example of the Synergy of 911 Bloggers. Our co-operative efforts are Vital to getting the Truth out to the rest of the world.

I would like to voice my appreciation to all my fellow bloggers for taking the time and effort to chase down all these information so the world will know.

May Truth & Justice Prevail!

ありがとう

Thank You.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it

WOW!.. just WOW.. this feels good :-p

And now YouTube is mysteriously down........

Did this affect the whole issue of giving oil to the coalition forces? It doesn't seem to have had an immediate effect, but I may be missing something. We really have to salute the honor and courage of someone that is willing to stand up before these people and present such a measured argument. I wish we were more Japanese...we could have ninja assassins slice the neo-cons into nice little pieces...

Dave
Phuckinehring

At the beginning of the first video, after Fujita says tells the Prime Minister that he may recall Fujita's question from November about whether terrorism is a war or a crime, Fujita does NOT say this:

"The 'War on Terror' started with the attacks of 9/11."

He says:

「まさに今回の法案の原点は９．１１なわけですけれでも」

"Masa ni, konkai no houan no genten ha, 9.11 na wake desukeredomo"

Which translates as:

"And as we all know, the starting point [or premise] of this bill is 9/11"

This is an important point, as I already discussed in the comments linked below.

Later, in transcripts I've seen, he says both that 9/11 was the starting point of the war and terror and that 9/11 is the starting point of the two bills, which means the government's proposal and the alternative bill of Fujita's party, which emphaszes development assistance to Afghanistan as a means of eliminating terrorism. (Because Japanese does not have a separate form for plural, when he says "bill" in my translation above, he may be referring to both bills. I would have to know if both bills were introduced and/or discussed at the November meeting, and even then wonder if context alone is enough without asking Mr. Fujita.

(Instead of "starting point," "origin," or "premise," or even "justification" might convey more of what he means- the word used does directly translate as starting point so that's probably fine too. Also, "was we all know" above is my translation of "masa ni" - undoubtedly might also work - it's just a phrase of emphasis.)

But here, he did NOT say war on terror. He is referring to an earlier meeting at which the government discussed, and maybe introduced, it's new anti-terrorism bill, and he says the starting point of that bill is 9/11.

I need to figure out what "Honkaigi" means - I think it is a legistative term of art for a particular point in the legislative process, and ideally, the statements about the November meeting will be translated more specifically than "you may recall I asked you in November." So this part is not exact. It is not inaccurate - it just does not convey all the information said. Perhaps it need not.

Regardless, the translation is incorrect. I'm not alleging anything; I assume it is a mistake. But accuracy of translation is of course important.

By all means, look at this videos, as the transcripts I've seen seem fine and you can get a very good idea of what he said. But I will not be promoting these videos until I am sure they are absolutely correct. They don't need to be perfect, but they cannot be plain wrong as in this case. So I need to know that there are no more mistakes. I'll try to do that today. Please wait, especially if you are going to send these to the press or public officials. And please be willing to send notification of corrections to anyone you do choose to send the videos to.

I said this in response to a blog by jazzdicekey, who has been working on or posting subtitled videos and I think did this one, here:

http://911blogger.com/node/13367#comment-174389

and in response to Fulford's translation here:

http://911blogger.com/node/13369#comment-174449

I am well-qualified to comment on the translations. Whoever did this has done yeoman's work and I really appreciate it -- it's easy to critique and I'm sure I would make mistakes also. But this is very important, as I think we all see, and should be done right. These translations are quite good and obviously done by very skilled persons. But Ideally, Mr. Fujita's party would have these done independently and professionally, by native speakers of English assisted by native speakers of Japanese, and release them officially in the party's name, with a link to the translator's certification.

Part 2 has no major problems, except a skip. But there are parts that could be made more precise.

0:13 "how you determined who they were" is more accurately "how you identified their bodies"

0:55 "As for how we know this" should be " As for identification of the bodies"

1:24

"So you talking about victims of a crime, and saying that you do not known because you do not have documents. Also you say you believe there was DNA testing, I guess done in America. That's not confirmation [confirmed identification of the bodies], is it? "

The current translation is generally accurate, but I think that every time Fujita emphasizes this is a crime that should be included. Therefore, add "So you talking about victims of a crime"

1:40 "I want to say today that this was a crime---terrorism is a crime---and crimes are suppose to be investigated." Adding "terrorism is a crime"

2:02 Skip in video -- what was cut?

2:05 Fujita says "Foreign Minister" but don't know what question he want answered because of the cut. But probably the same question the bureaucrat answered about the bodies.

Mr. Fujita has indicated at his blog that a transcript of his questions and the ministers' answers will be posted as soon as it is complete. He's written an article about his intent in asking the questions, here:

http://www.election.ne.jp/10870/37036.html

I'm going to wait for the transcript, then compare it to Benjamin Fulford's translation and the subtitles for completeness and accuracy. I'm hoping that his party will post a professional, certified translation, which would be ideal.

I have reviewed Part 7 of 8 in the above videos, and there are a few problems that I will roughly identify:

At around 0:48, after saying there has not been a proper investigation and analysis by the Japanese government, he talks about Japanese involvement in U.S.-led military operations, investigation of victims since this is a crime, and assistance to the victims' families, and that he thinks that Japanese government has not taken action on these matters. It's a little unclear to me, but I think he is saying that a new and proper investigation and analysis must be the starting point for the government's response to all these matters. All this can be gotten from other statements he made, so this sentence is just somthing missing and not an inaccuracy. It can wait until a transcript is released.

At around 1:26, the subtitle reads "too many victims" but I think he said too much has been sacrificed. Also, missing from this part is his statement that the Japanese government is relying on indirect information from the U.S. government. So he is saying that the stakes are so high that the Japanese government should not rely on indirect reports of the U.S. government.

At around 2:27, there's any interesting exchange where he addresses the Defense Minister by name, and I think he says "Defense Minister Ishiba's name is attached to this report" about U.S. military response on 9/11. The Defense Minister then looks up at him and goes "hmmmph." That's an interesting exchange that the subtitles should explain.

Overall so far, I'm finding that the subtitles for videos 1, 2, and 7, are basically sound, but could be improved. My biggest concern remains the subtitles beginning of the first video, which fail to set the context of considering the government's anti-terrorism bill. That appears later on, but should also appear at the beginning.

I'm going to finish with Part 8 of 8 because I don't have time. Parts 3-6 concern the evidence, which frankly I'm not as interested in, and which are somewhat self-explanatory through the visual aids. I'm waiting for the transcript on these. I'm sure the subtitles are adequate to understand what's going on, and how meaningless the responses are.

I don't really care if Fujita chose faulty evidence or didn't make the best case for why an investigation is proper. Any number of arguments could be made. We all know that there has not been a real and open investigation. It's the political and legal arguments he makes that interest me.

The whole point of appealing to the UFO crowd is to pack the movement with people who will believe anything.

While some UFOs may be real, ask yourself who you know that spends time on UFO forums and going to UFO events. While a minority may be PhDs, etc., the only people I know into UFOs that much have shown *no criticial thinking skills* around the issue of the 9/11 attacks -- IOW, they fell for every hoax right away and functioned to spread them as human carriers spread a virus.

The best way to destroy our work is to keep us going in circles to cope with mis- and dis-info and so funneling people w/o critical thinking skills into the movement is one way to stop us.

The more people we have who are linking 9/11 and UFOs, the more we find ourselves in a swamp of nonsense that we have to debunk.

In the early days of 911 research, and forums on US psy-war operations, the forums would be inundated with hundreds of pictures of photo-shopped aliens. This was a clear sign to me that the “UFO”-folks were manipulated by professional counter intelligence. The “spamming” photo’s made the pages unreadable with slow internet connections.

I later read an article in “Nexus” magazine, implying that a faction out of the “disclosure-group” actually were trying to disclose that the Pentagon was running a psy-war operation to introduce a further element of doubt among the population, to better control them. This brings me to research done at Princeton University in the late 30ties early 40ties. On the basis of the experiment with airing Orson Well’s “War of the Worlds”, they studied how to instil fear on a mass scale to the population, to better control them. Much of the basic research and experiments had already been done by German propaganda researchers imported/invited from the Third Reich. This research group later went on to become the propaganda arm of the National Security Council.

I learned this from an amazing research article over at http://www.mackwhite.com/tv.html. To me, the highly publicized “Crop Circle” phenomenon can be likened to how the former church elites organised “Miracles” to instil doubt and better control the populace.

My advice would be to listen with interest, but be aware how the art of instilling doubt has been used in the past by the elites to consolidate their power.

The physics and logistics of the 911 Psy-War operations were designed for maximum shock and awe on us, the domestic and western population, to control us. When the initial shock was gone, we had ample opportunity to study its psy-war construction. It IS a carefully prepared psy-war beyond all reasonable doubt.

I do not have an opinion on M. Stephen Greer, I have not carefully looked at his work, but I do feel it is interesting that the DC National Press Club meeting was held on May 9th 2001. This could be part of a run up to the 9/11 Psy-Op, to instil confusion and help discredit reasonable investigation into the official myths of 9/11. It is possible that a lot of the “chem.-trails” talk, and “Armstrong never set his foot on the moon” people where also knowingly, or un-knowingly, spreading information carefully prepared by people who were working for a government program that was started with Rockefeller grants in the late 1930ties.

Be like Saint Thomas, and believe your OWN eyes and critical reasoning!

Love²

Dr Beeth

Thank-you George Washington, for your essay: "Why We'll Win" http://www.911blogger.com/node/13410
Recent google-video of importance for those who missed it: “What is wrong with today’s media” : http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2293923683440246993&hl=en-CA

"Unflinching, unswerving, fierce intellectual determination, as citizens, to define the real truth of our lives and our societies is a crucial obligation which devolves upon us all. It is in fact mandatory. (Harold Pinter)

As a Canadian I know Benjamin Fulford a little more than most of where he is coming from.

He is a member of a family that has done medium type work in the past.

The grandmother acted as a medium for Canada's PM King back in the 1930s and 1940s at the home of the multi-millionaire Fulford family home in Brockville, Ontario on Lake Ontario.

The family blames the Rockefellers for having murdered the multi-millionaire of the family in 1905 when he tried to hire Tesla for projects. Fulford was also a Senator in Canada. The family was in politics after with the son becoming a member of parliament also.

Fulford's father was an MP and was ambassador to Saudi Arabia. He has been able to get a lot of info on world politics over the years besides being bureau chief for Forbes Mag in Tokyo for 6 years quitting after their apparent corruption left him cold.

Fulford and the Yakuza or whoever -- in Japan share this blood-bond -- they both blame the Rockefellers for murder -- the Rockefellers are blamed for the more recent murder of two Japanese bankers.