Yes it was a very pleasant experience that the anchor was so helpful.
I believe he simply gave us the same professional service that he normally gives to other guests in order to help them communicate their message.
But that is so unlike most other examples of how MSM treats 911truth.
Of course what little information we actually managed to squeeze into those 7 minutes matters in itself, but I believe the more important message of that broadcast was actually that the anchor treated us respectfully.
By doing that he signals to the viewers that it is OK to engage in a friendly and meaningful conversation about 911truth, and that people don't have to shy away from this agenda and the persons who promulgates it.
He is shaping the groupthink attitude positively towards 911truth (pardon my English)
After doing this interview people I know from my local area, who weren't aware of my interest in 911truth approached me smilingly, and commented on my appearance. Not so much to talk about the actual issue, but mostly to give the usual appreciation that you give to someone you know who has appeared in MSM... the '15 minutes of fame' effect i guess.
I take this as confirmation of the subliminal groupthink-message that was conveyed by the broadcast, and I doubt that these same persons would have approached me regarding this broadcast, if the TV-anchor had been hostile to us.
I am very hesitant about exposing myself as a 'conspiracy nut' in my local area, where I interact with parents of my own children's friends from kindergarten, and I have always visualized these encounters in a somewhat hostile setting.
Now after this feedback from people who watched the broadcast, I am able to envisage a more friendly dialoque, which is rarely portrayed in 911truth-videos of citizen encounters.
It is a very constructive feeling to be able to imagine 911truth discussions with nontruthers in a friendly atmosphere... You should try that yourself sometime ;-)

911truthing doesn't have to be a hostile and defensive proposition.

Of course the question that lingers in the back of my mind is - why?
Why does MSM in Denmark 'suddenly' allow 911truth to be handled nicely?
Have any of you watched the movie "The Insurgents"?
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0758757/
This movie couples 911truth to truckbomb-making. It plays right into the HR1955 radicalization-act meme.
Maybe the MSM is changing mode from ignoring 911truth to more directly attacking it. Because they can no longer keep it ignored, they prefer to keep the initiative on how to shape the MSM communication of 911truth.
I must say that I found it somewhat disturbing that the points brought up in this movie during the 'motivational 911truth-speech' were so much alike those points that I brought up in the broadcast.

Regards, Jakob Hede Madsen.