Peter Power Responds to We Are Change UK

This response was posted by Peter Power on the J7 campaign website in response to our confrontation with him. The usual straw man tactics of throwing in stuff about the WTC and paid actors at the bus bomb, despite us only asking him who the company was and how they chose the stations they did for their drill.

" I rarely respond to allegations that there was a direct connection between an exercise my company was running on 7 July 2005 and the real events that happened that day, but having just seen on You Tube a highly misleading video following a childish stunt against me on 12/12/07 I feel I have little choice but to make three important points:

First, I chose to meet 2 people that day who requested an interview with me while I was attending a conference in a London hotel. Having shaken their hands and asked where they were from I noticed I was being covertly filmed by one of them who denied it, although it was obvious. As it is not possible to have a civilised conversation when deceit from one side was apparent from the outset, I apologised that I could not help in such circumstances and suggested another time perhaps? I then walked back to the conference – suddenly pursued by 2 or 3 shouting people trying to make it appear I was fleeing?

Second, it’s worth reminding some people that the London underground system has so far been the subject of terrorist bombings on 21 occasions, going back to 1885. Also, on the same day as our exercise, a major law firm in the City of London was running an exercise that involved bombs on the underground. A few days before so did a major German bank in London and even the Metropolitan Police. We were not alone.

Third, our table top exercise was to involve a very small group of crisis managers under test, from a company employing c1000 people. No one was on the streets at all. Just one part of the scenario was similar to IRA incendiary bombs planted on the underground in 1992 to start fires on three underground trains, albeit the locations were by sheer coincidence, more 2005 that 1992. That’s not so surprising when we had a limited number of underground lines to choose from, given the location of our client in the centre of London.

There will be no convincing some very odd people who think actors were on the bus that was actually bombed and the UK Government staged the whole thing on 7/7, the World Trade Centre was pre-wired with explosives on 9/11 and even that tragedy was a US Government setup.

At a time when this country is under a sustained terrorist threat it makes sense to base any exercise scenario on realism and historical events and in so doing hopefully increase our overall resilience to this threat. Had the odd people I met on 12.12.07 bothered to have a proper conversation with me I would have explained all this to them but fantasists will, no matter what I say, always prefer sensationalism to sense and conspiracy to coincidence.

Peter Power. Visor Consultants Limited. 15 December 2007
Peter Power | Homepage | 12.15.07 - 10:55 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.julyseventh.co.uk/july-7-terror-rehearsal.html

oooooo this snake is slippery...

He got one thing right though: "it is not possible to have a civilised conversation when deceit from one side was apparent from the outset".

Give him a chance to reply by a prepared video interview.

John A MITCHELL
Herblay FRANCE

bonjour ,

I have spent around 100 hours on Peter Power television footage, etc and I saw the WeAreChage video. It is true we are not the police and cannot expect that he will reply in normal conditions and we must rest correct.

However he suggested in his letter "suggested another time perhaps?" so why not take him up on his word and film his reply in better conditions ? And he seems to have an opinion on the destruction of the towers. We should point out to him that there is forensic chemical evidence that the WTC was bought down with explosives so his
"There will be no convincing some very odd people who think actors were on the bus that was actually bombed and the UK Government staged the whole thing on 7/7, the World Trade Centre was pre-wired with explosives on 9/11 and even that tragedy was a US Government set-up."
is faulty on at least that.

Also we should point out that the military exercises going on at the same time did all but help the military to react quickly to the aeroplanes detected off course. Madame Rice thought that no one could have imagined such a usage of the aeroplanes against the towers. But on that very day there was an exercise on hijacked planes. Does he not think that these exercises helped the attacks to take place ? Does he not think that the terrorists could have chosen another day or were they informed of the military exercises ? What does he have to say on these exercises ?

Does he not see our problem in finding that the circumstances in the 911 attacks and the 7/7 attacks are the same? For the moment his letter is not convincing.

Yours John