Boston Tea Party Speakers Kevin Ryan and Barbara Honegger on 9/11 & Empire Radio Tonight
Getting ready for the Boston Tea Party for 9/11 Truth! http: http://www.boston911truth.org/
Kevin Ryan, the Underwriters Labs whistleblower and NIST report demolisher, will be my first hour guest on 9/11 and Empire Radio tonight, Tuesday 12/4/07, 9-10 pm CT. Kevin is not just a lucid scientific critic of the official story, he's also a voice of uncommon common sense in the 9/11 truth movement--a spiritually-grounded guy whose opinions I always respect and usually agree with. For example, he just convinced me to drop an uncomplimentary reference to Cindy Sheehan from a piece I had written. I had not meant it to be uncomplimentary to her, but to some of those surrounding her, yet when I re-read it I saw that Kevin was absolutely right that it never should have been posted and needed to come down. I invite those who have a beef with anything I've written to follow Kevin's example--email me with a specific reference to the questionable passage and I'll try to give your critique fair-minded consideration. Writers need good editors--but in the internet age we rarely have any. My email address is kevin@mujca.com
My second-hour guest (10-11 pm CT) will be Barbara Honegger, who along with Mia Hamel is a Founding Mother of the Boston Tea Party for 9/11 Truth. Barbara is Senior Military Affairs Journalist at the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterrey, and the author of the book October Surprise (on the treasonous Bush Sr. hostage deal that brought down Jimmy Carter) and the article The Clock that Broke the Lie (on the 9/11 Pentagon bombing): http://blog.lege.net/content/Seven_Hours_in_September.pdf We'll talk about how the idea for the Boston Tea Party was hatched, and also discuss new 9/11 evidence that Barbara has uncovered.
Feel free to call in: 512-646-1984 (please use if you have free or cheap long distance) or 888-202-1984
See you in Boston!
- Kevin Barrett's blog
- Login to post comments
It's a begining, chum, but it's not enough
"For example, he just convinced me to drop an uncomplimentary reference to Cindy Sheehan from a piece I had written. I had not meant it to be uncomplimentary to her, but to some of those surrounding her, yet when I re-read it I saw that Kevin was absolutely right that it never should have been posted and needed to come down."
Like I said, good begining. Still, it's only a begining. Loads more what that needs fixing and it's not hard for any one to find, either:
"I checked the piece he is referring to and while he has removed ONE of the uncomplimentary references, there are still several others remaining (including adjectives like "mendacious", "ignorant", etc, along with a recommendation to the Kennebunkport people to take legal action against Sheehan and the others). Barrett seems to be playing games."
That's not me, so people besides Jenny can see it fine. If they can see it, so can you, which makes the following far too coy for belief:
"I invite those who have a beef with anything I've written to follow Kevin's example--email me with a specific reference to the questionable passage and I'll try to give your critique fair-minded consideration. Writers need good editors--but in the internet age we rarely have any."
You're a big boy, Kev. You know what the problem is and some of what needsdone to fix it. Please sort it ASAP--before the Boston Tea Party for Truth.
______________________________________
http://coljennysparks.blogspot.com/
Hard to find editors? You're balmy!
In the internet age, there's no excuse for not sending out
your stuff to six trusted friends before posting it. It's not
like you have to read it to them on the phone, or wait for
a snail mail response or anything.